IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v253y2017i2d10.1007_s10479-016-2107-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing policy quality in a multistage stochastic program for long-term hydrothermal scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Vitor L. de Matos

    (Plan4 Engenharia)

  • David P. Morton

    (Northwestern University)

  • Erlon C. Finardi

    (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)

Abstract

We consider a multistage stochastic linear program in which we aim to assess the quality of an operational policy computed by means of a stochastic dual dynamic programming algorithm. We perform policy assessment by considering two strategies to compute a confidence interval on the optimality gap: (i) using multiple scenario trees and (ii) using a single scenario tree. The first approach has already been considered in several applications, while the second approach has been discussed previously only in a two-stage framework. The second approach is useful in practical applications in order to more quickly assess the quality of a policy. We present these ideas in the context of a multistage stochastic program for Brazilian long-term hydrothermal scheduling, and use numerical instances to compare the confidence intervals on the optimality gap computed via both strategies. We further consider the relative merits of using naive Monte Carlo sampling, randomized quasi Monte Carlo sampling, and Latin hypercube sampling within our framework for assessing the quality of a policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitor L. de Matos & David P. Morton & Erlon C. Finardi, 2017. "Assessing policy quality in a multistage stochastic program for long-term hydrothermal scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(2), pages 713-731, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:253:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2107-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2107-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-016-2107-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-016-2107-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shapiro, Alexander, 2011. "Analysis of stochastic dual dynamic programming method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 63-72, February.
    2. Z. L. Chen & W. B. Powell, 1999. "Convergent Cutting-Plane and Partial-Sampling Algorithm for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs with Recourse," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 497-524, September.
    3. David P. Morton, 1998. "Stopping Rules for a Class of Sampling-Based Stochastic Programming Algorithms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 710-718, October.
    4. Philpott, A.B. & de Matos, V.L., 2012. "Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 470-483.
    5. Tanrisever, Fehmi & Morrice, Douglas & Morton, David, 2012. "Managing capacity flexibility in make-to-order production environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 334-345.
    6. Vincent Guigues, 2014. "SDDP for some interstage dependent risk-averse problems and application to hydro-thermal planning," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 167-203, January.
    7. Güzin Bayraksan & David P. Morton, 2011. "A Sequential Sampling Procedure for Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 898-913, August.
    8. Kjetil Høyland & Stein W. Wallace, 2001. "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 295-307, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jangho Park & Rebecca Stockbridge & Güzin Bayraksan, 2021. "Variance reduction for sequential sampling in stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 171-204, May.
    2. Murwan Siddig & Yongjia Song, 2022. "Adaptive partition-based SDDP algorithms for multistage stochastic linear programming with fixed recourse," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 201-250, January.
    3. Andre Luiz Diniz & Maria Elvira P. Maceira & Cesar Luis V. Vasconcellos & Debora Dias J. Penna, 2020. "A combined SDDP/Benders decomposition approach with a risk-averse surface concept for reservoir operation in long term power generation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 649-681, September.
    4. van Ackooij, Wim & De Boeck, Jérôme & Detienne, Boris & Pan, Stefania & Poss, Michael, 2018. "Optimizing power generation in the presence of micro-grids," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 450-461.
    5. Xiaotie Chen & David L. Woodruff, 2024. "Distributions and bootstrap for data-based stochastic programming," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, June.
    6. E. Ruben van Beesten & Nick W. Koning & David P. Morton, 2024. "Assessing solution quality in risk-averse stochastic programs," Papers 2408.15690, arXiv.org.
    7. W. Ackooij & X. Warin, 2020. "On conditional cuts for stochastic dual dynamic programming," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 173-199, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Ackooij & X. Warin, 2020. "On conditional cuts for stochastic dual dynamic programming," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 173-199, June.
    2. Wim Ackooij & Welington Oliveira & Yongjia Song, 2019. "On level regularization with normal solutions in decomposition methods for multistage stochastic programming problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 1-42, September.
    3. Davi Valladão & Thuener Silva & Marcus Poggi, 2019. "Time-consistent risk-constrained dynamic portfolio optimization with transactional costs and time-dependent returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 379-405, November.
    4. Guigues, Vincent, 2017. "Dual Dynamic Programing with cut selection: Convergence proof and numerical experiments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 47-57.
    5. Soares, Murilo Pereira & Street, Alexandre & Valladão, Davi Michel, 2017. "On the solution variability reduction of Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming applied to energy planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 743-760.
    6. Powell, Warren B., 2019. "A unified framework for stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 795-821.
    7. Weini Zhang & Hamed Rahimian & Güzin Bayraksan, 2016. "Decomposition Algorithms for Risk-Averse Multistage Stochastic Programs with Application to Water Allocation under Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 385-404, August.
    8. Nils Löhndorf & David Wozabal & Stefan Minner, 2013. "Optimizing Trading Decisions for Hydro Storage Systems Using Approximate Dual Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 810-823, August.
    9. de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2016. "Stochastic hydro-thermal scheduling optimization: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 382-395.
    10. Lee, Jinkyu & Bae, Sanghyeon & Kim, Woo Chang & Lee, Yongjae, 2023. "Value function gradient learning for large-scale multistage stochastic programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 321-335.
    11. Zhou, Shaorui & Zhang, Hui & Shi, Ning & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Fan, 2020. "A new convergent hybrid learning algorithm for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 33-46.
    12. Lorenzo Reus & Rodolfo Prado, 2022. "Need to Meet Investment Goals? Track Synthetic Indexes with the SDDP Method," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 47-69, June.
    13. Michelle Bandarra & Vincent Guigues, 2021. "Single cut and multicut stochastic dual dynamic programming with cut selection for multistage stochastic linear programs: convergence proof and numerical experiments," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 125-148, June.
    14. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Panos Parpas & Berk Ustun & Mort Webster & Quang Kha Tran, 2015. "Importance Sampling in Stochastic Programming: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 358-377, May.
    16. Pritchard, Geoffrey, 2015. "Stochastic inflow modeling for hydropower scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 496-504.
    17. Saurabh Bansal & James S. Dyer, 2017. "Technical Note—Multivariate Partial-Expectation Results for Exact Solutions of Two-Stage Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1526-1534, December.
    18. A. B. Philpott & V. L. Matos & L. Kapelevich, 2018. "Distributionally robust SDDP," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 431-454, October.
    19. Singh, Bindeshwar & Mukherjee, V. & Tiwari, Prabhakar, 2015. "A survey on impact assessment of DG and FACTS controllers in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 846-882.
    20. Ansaripoor, Amir H. & Oliveira, Fernando S., 2018. "Flexible lease contracts in the fleet replacement problem with alternative fuel vehicles: A real-options approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 316-327.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:253:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2107-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.