IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v164y2015i1d10.1007_s10957-014-0561-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence of the Surrogate Lagrangian Relaxation Method

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail A. Bragin

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Peter B. Luh

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Joseph H. Yan

    (Southern California Edison)

  • Nanpeng Yu

    (Southern California Edison)

  • Gary A. Stern

    (Southern California Edison)

Abstract

Studies have shown that the surrogate subgradient method, to optimize non-smooth dual functions within the Lagrangian relaxation framework, can lead to significant computational improvements as compared to the subgradient method. The key idea is to obtain surrogate subgradient directions that form acute angles toward the optimal multipliers without fully minimizing the relaxed problem. The major difficulty of the method is its convergence, since the convergence proof and the practical implementation require the knowledge of the optimal dual value. Adaptive estimations of the optimal dual value may lead to divergence and the loss of the lower bound property for surrogate dual values. The main contribution of this paper is on the development of the surrogate Lagrangian relaxation method and its convergence proof to the optimal multipliers, without the knowledge of the optimal dual value and without fully optimizing the relaxed problem. Moreover, for practical implementations, a stepsizing formula that guarantees convergence without requiring the optimal dual value has been constructively developed. The key idea is to select stepsizes in a way that distances between Lagrange multipliers at consecutive iterations decrease, and as a result, Lagrange multipliers converge to a unique limit. At the same time, stepsizes are kept sufficiently large so that the algorithm does not terminate prematurely. At convergence, the lower-bound property of the surrogate dual is guaranteed. Testing results demonstrate that non-smooth dual functions can be efficiently optimized, and the new method leads to faster convergence as compared to other methods available for optimizing non-smooth dual functions, namely, the simple subgradient method, the subgradient-level method, and the incremental subgradient method.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail A. Bragin & Peter B. Luh & Joseph H. Yan & Nanpeng Yu & Gary A. Stern, 2015. "Convergence of the Surrogate Lagrangian Relaxation Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 173-201, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:164:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-014-0561-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-014-0561-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-014-0561-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-014-0561-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Sun & Q. C. Zhao & P. B. Luh, 2007. "On the Surrogate Gradient Algorithm for Lagrangian Relaxation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 413-416, June.
    2. Marius Posta & Jacques Ferland & Philippe Michelon, 2012. "An exact method with variable fixing for solving the generalized assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 629-644, July.
    3. Laguna, Manuel & Kelly, James P. & Gonzalez-Velarde, JoseLuis & Glover, Fred, 1995. "Tabu search for the multilevel generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 176-189, April.
    4. Yagiura, Mutsunori & Ibaraki, Toshihide & Glover, Fred, 2006. "A path relinking approach with ejection chains for the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 548-569, March.
    5. Nicos Christofides & Enrique Benavent, 1989. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Problem on a Tree," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 760-768, October.
    6. Pasquale Avella & Maurizio Boccia & Igor Vasilyev, 2010. "A computational study of exact knapsack separation for the generalized assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 543-555, April.
    7. X. Zhao & P. B. Luh & J. Wang, 1999. "Surrogate Gradient Algorithm for Lagrangian Relaxation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 699-712, March.
    8. T. S. Chang, 2008. "Comments on “Surrogate Gradient Algorithm for Lagrangian Relaxation”," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 691-697, June.
    9. Lemaréchal, C. & Nemirovskii, A. & Nesterov, Y., 1995. "New variants of bundle methods," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1166, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    10. NESTEROV, Yu., 2005. "Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1819, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. A. M. Geoffrion & G. W. Graves, 1976. "Scheduling Parallel Production Lines with Changeover Costs: Practical Application of a Quadratic Assignment/ LP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 595-610, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monique Guignard, 2020. "Strong RLT1 bounds from decomposable Lagrangean relaxation for some quadratic 0–1 optimization problems with linear constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 173-200, March.
    2. Wang, Tingsong & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "A two-stage stochastic nonlinear integer-programming model for slot allocation of a liner container shipping service," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 143-160.
    3. Wang, Tingsong & Xing, Zheng & Hu, Hongtao & Qu, Xiaobo, 2019. "Overbooking and delivery-delay-allowed strategies for container slot allocation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 433-447.
    4. Azadian, Farshid & Murat, Alper & Chinnam, Ratna Babu, 2015. "Integrated production and logistics planning: Contract manufacturing and choice of air/surface transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 113-123.
    5. Farhan Hyder & Bing Yan & Mikhail Bragin & Peter Luh, 2024. "Convex Hull Pricing for Unit Commitment: Survey, Insights, and Discussions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Castillo-Zunino & Pinar Keskinocak, 2021. "Bi-criteria multiple knapsack problem with grouped items," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 747-789, October.
    2. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2020. "Essentials of numerical nonsmooth optimization," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-47, March.
    3. G. Rius-Sorolla & J. Maheut & Jairo R. Coronado-Hernandez & J. P. Garcia-Sabater, 2020. "Lagrangian relaxation of the generic materials and operations planning model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 105-123, March.
    4. Yunmei Chen & Xiaojing Ye & Wei Zhang, 2020. "Acceleration techniques for level bundle methods in weakly smooth convex constrained optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 411-432, November.
    5. Arkadi Nemirovski & Shmuel Onn & Uriel G. Rothblum, 2010. "Accuracy Certificates for Computational Problems with Convex Structure," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 52-78, February.
    6. Ruslan Sadykov & François Vanderbeck & Artur Pessoa & Issam Tahiri & Eduardo Uchoa, 2019. "Primal Heuristics for Branch and Price: The Assets of Diving Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 251-267, April.
    7. Woodcock, Andrew J. & Wilson, John M., 2010. "A hybrid tabu search/branch & bound approach to solving the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 566-578, December.
    8. Gelareh, Shahin & Glover, Fred & Guemri, Oualid & Hanafi, Saïd & Nduwayo, Placide & Todosijević, Raca, 2020. "A comparative study of formulations for a cross-dock door assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Vié, Marie-Sklaerder & Zufferey, Nicolas & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2019. "Solving the Wire-Harness Design Problem at a European car manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 712-724.
    10. Marius Posta & Jacques Ferland & Philippe Michelon, 2012. "An exact method with variable fixing for solving the generalized assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 629-644, July.
    11. Chunming Tang & Bo He & Zhenzhen Wang, 2020. "Modified Accelerated Bundle-Level Methods and Their Application in Two-Stage Stochastic Programming," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Jeet, V. & Kutanoglu, E., 2007. "Lagrangian relaxation guided problem space search heuristics for generalized assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1039-1056, November.
    13. Azadian, Farshid & Murat, Alper & Chinnam, Ratna Babu, 2015. "Integrated production and logistics planning: Contract manufacturing and choice of air/surface transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 113-123.
    14. A. Pessoa & R. Sadykov & E. Uchoa & F. Vanderbeck, 2018. "Automation and Combination of Linear-Programming Based Stabilization Techniques in Column Generation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 339-360, May.
    15. Pasquale Avella & Maurizio Boccia & Igor Vasilyev, 2012. "Computational Testing of a Separation Procedure for the Knapsack Set with a Single Continuous Variable," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 165-171, February.
    16. Torki, Abdolhamid & Yajima, Yatsutoshi & Enkawa, Takao, 1996. "A low-rank bilinear programming approach for sub-optimal solution of the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 384-391, October.
    17. M Büther, 2010. "Reducing the elastic generalized assignment problem to the standard generalized assignment problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(11), pages 1582-1595, November.
    18. Mutsunori Yagiura & Toshihide Ibaraki & Fred Glover, 2004. "An Ejection Chain Approach for the Generalized Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 133-151, May.
    19. Mattfeld, D. C. & Kopfer, H., 2003. "Terminal operations management in vehicle transshipment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 435-452, June.
    20. L Tang & H Xuan, 2006. "Lagrangian relaxation algorithms for real-time hybrid flowshop scheduling with finite intermediate buffers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 316-324, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:164:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-014-0561-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.