IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v91y2020ics0305048317311908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of formulations for a cross-dock door assignment problem

Author

Listed:
  • Gelareh, Shahin
  • Glover, Fred
  • Guemri, Oualid
  • Hanafi, Saïd
  • Nduwayo, Placide
  • Todosijević, Raca

Abstract

A cross docking facility is a type of warehouse in supply chain management that allows orders to be prepared with or without going through the phase of storing products in the warehouse and subsequently selecting them for delivery. The goods are unloaded from incoming trucks called origins on inbound doors of a cross-docking facility platform and, using a handling device inside the platform such as a forklift, immediately transferred to outbound doors to be loaded into outgoing trucks named destinations or delivery trucks for distribution to customers. Contrary to a traditional warehouse, goods are unloaded and loaded without placing them in temporary storage inside the cross-docking facility. The goal of the cross-docking assignment problem (CDAP) is to assign origins to inbound doors and destinations to outbound doors so that the total cost inside the cross-dock platform is minimized. To the best of our knowledge, there are only three mixed integer programming (MIP) formulations of the CDAP in the literature. We propose eight new MIP models and demonstrate the mathematical equivalence of all 11 models, together with rigorously proving some of their properties. In order to detect which of these 11 models is best, we conduct an extensive comparative analysis on benchmark instances from the literature, which discloses that the best model is one proposed in this paper for the first time.

Suggested Citation

  • Gelareh, Shahin & Glover, Fred & Guemri, Oualid & Hanafi, Saïd & Nduwayo, Placide & Todosijević, Raca, 2020. "A comparative study of formulations for a cross-dock door assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:91:y:2020:i:c:s0305048317311908
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048317311908
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2018.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Belle, Jan & Valckenaers, Paul & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2012. "Cross-docking: State of the art," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 827-846.
    2. Hahn, Peter M. & Kim, Bum-Jin & Stutzle, Thomas & Kanthak, Sebastian & Hightower, William L. & Samra, Harvind & Ding, Zhi & Guignard, Monique, 2008. "The quadratic three-dimensional assignment problem: Exact and approximate solution methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 416-428, January.
    3. W. Nassief & I. Contreras & R. As’ad, 2016. "A mixed-integer programming formulation and Lagrangean relaxation for the cross-dock door assignment problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 494-508, January.
    4. Buijs, Paul & Vis, Iris F.A. & Carlo, Héctor J., 2014. "Synchronization in cross-docking networks: A research classification and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 593-608.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2010. "Cross dock scheduling: Classification, literature review and research agenda," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 413-422, December.
    6. Hermel, Dror & Hasheminia, Hamed & Adler, Nicole & Fry, Michael J., 2016. "A solution framework for the multi-mode resource-constrained cross-dock scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 157-170.
    7. Miao, Zhaowei & Lim, Andrew & Ma, Hong, 2009. "Truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraint within crossdocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 105-115, January.
    8. Laguna, Manuel & Kelly, James P. & Gonzalez-Velarde, JoseLuis & Glover, Fred, 1995. "Tabu search for the multilevel generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 176-189, April.
    9. Yagiura, Mutsunori & Ibaraki, Toshihide & Glover, Fred, 2006. "A path relinking approach with ejection chains for the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 548-569, March.
    10. Mutsunori Yagiura & Toshihide Ibaraki & Fred Glover, 2004. "An Ejection Chain Approach for the Generalized Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 133-151, May.
    11. Jeet, V. & Kutanoglu, E., 2007. "Lagrangian relaxation guided problem space search heuristics for generalized assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1039-1056, November.
    12. John J. Bartholdi & Kevin R. Gue, 2004. "The Best Shape for a Crossdock," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 235-244, May.
    13. Kevin R. Gue, 1999. "The Effects of Trailer Scheduling on the Layout of Freight Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 419-428, November.
    14. Jean-François Cordeau & Manlio Gaudioso & Gilbert Laporte & Luigi Moccia, 2006. "A Memetic Heuristic for the Generalized Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 433-443, November.
    15. John J. Bartholdi & Kevin R. Gue, 2000. "Reducing Labor Costs in an LTL Crossdocking Terminal," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 823-832, December.
    16. Ladier, Anne-Laure & Alpan, Gülgün, 2016. "Cross-docking operations: Current research versus industry practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 145-162.
    17. Gelareh, Shahin & Monemi, Rahimeh Neamatian & Semet, Frédéric & Goncalves, Gilles, 2016. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for the truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1144-1152.
    18. Pessoa, Artur Alves & Hahn, Peter M. & Guignard, Monique & Zhu, Yi-Rong, 2010. "Algorithms for the generalized quadratic assignment problem combining Lagrangean decomposition and the Reformulation-Linearization Technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 54-63, October.
    19. Woodcock, Andrew J. & Wilson, John M., 2010. "A hybrid tabu search/branch & bound approach to solving the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 566-578, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji, Bin & Zhang, Zheng & Yu, Samson S. & Zhou, Saiqi & Wu, Guohua, 2023. "Modelling and heuristically solving many-to-many heterogeneous vehicle routing problem with cross-docking and two-dimensional loading constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1219-1235.
    2. Vanajakumari, Manoj & Sun, Haoying & Jones, Ashley & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2022. "Supply chain planning: A case for Hybrid Cross-Docks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Li, Mingjie & Hao, Jin-Kao & Wu, Qinghua, 2024. "A flow based formulation and a reinforcement learning based strategic oscillation for cross-dock door assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 473-492.
    4. Wolff, Pascal & Emde, Simon & Pfohl, Hans-Christian, 2021. "Internal resource requirements: The better performance metric for truck scheduling?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Sayed Ibrahim Sayed & Ivan Contreras & Juan A. Diaz & Dolores E. Luna, 2020. "Integrated cross-dock door assignment and truck scheduling with handling times," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 705-727, October.
    6. Feifeng Zheng & Yaxin Pang & Yinfeng Xu, 2022. "Heuristics for cross-docking scheduling of truck arrivals, truck departures and shop-floor operations," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1571-1601, July.
    7. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Nihal Sütütemiz & Figen Yıldırım & Shahryar Ghorbani & Renata Činčikaitė, 2022. "Optimizing Multi Cross-Docking Systems with a Multi-Objective Green Location Routing Problem Considering Carbon Emission and Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Fatma Essghaier & Hamid Allaoui & Gilles Goncalves, 2021. "Truck to door assignment in a shared cross-dock under uncertainty," Post-Print hal-04066589, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Corsten & Ferdinand Becker & Hagen Salewski, 2020. "Integrating truck and workforce scheduling in a cross-dock: analysis of different workforce coordination policies," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 207-237, March.
    2. Rijal, Arpan & Bijvank, Marco & de Koster, René, 2019. "Integrated scheduling and assignment of trucks at unit-load cross-dock terminals with mixed service mode dock doors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 752-771.
    3. Guemri, Oualid & Nduwayo, Placide & Todosijević, Raca & Hanafi, Saïd & Glover, Fred, 2019. "Probabilistic Tabu Search for the Cross-Docking Assignment Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 875-885.
    4. Li, Mingjie & Hao, Jin-Kao & Wu, Qinghua, 2024. "A flow based formulation and a reinforcement learning based strategic oscillation for cross-dock door assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 473-492.
    5. Tadumadze, Giorgi & Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Weidinger, Felix, 2019. "Integrated truck and workforce scheduling to accelerate the unloading of trucks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 343-362.
    6. Wolff, Pascal & Emde, Simon & Pfohl, Hans-Christian, 2021. "Internal resource requirements: The better performance metric for truck scheduling?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Xi, Xiang & Changchun, Liu & Yuan, Wang & Loo Hay, Lee, 2020. "Two-stage conflict robust optimization models for cross-dock truck scheduling problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Vanajakumari, Manoj & Sun, Haoying & Jones, Ashley & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2022. "Supply chain planning: A case for Hybrid Cross-Docks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Peter Bodnar & René de Koster & Kaveh Azadeh, 2017. "Scheduling Trucks in a Cross-Dock with Mixed Service Mode Dock Doors," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 112-131, February.
    10. Ladier, Anne-Laure & Alpan, Gülgün, 2016. "Cross-docking operations: Current research versus industry practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 145-162.
    11. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Fedtke, Stefan & Schmickerath, Marcel, 2019. "Automated sortation conveyors: A survey from an operational research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 796-815.
    12. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Felix Weidinger, 2017. "Truck Scheduling in the Postal Service Industry," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 723-736, May.
    13. Sayed Ibrahim Sayed & Ivan Contreras & Juan A. Diaz & Dolores E. Luna, 2020. "Integrated cross-dock door assignment and truck scheduling with handling times," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 705-727, October.
    14. Buijs, Paul & Vis, Iris F.A. & Carlo, Héctor J., 2014. "Synchronization in cross-docking networks: A research classification and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 593-608.
    15. Konur, Dinçer & Golias, Mihalis M., 2013. "Cost-stable truck scheduling at a cross-dock facility with unknown truck arrivals: A meta-heuristic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 71-91.
    16. Fonseca, Gabriela B. & Nogueira, Thiago H. & Ravetti, Martín Gómez, 2019. "A hybrid Lagrangian metaheuristic for the cross-docking flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 139-154.
    17. Vincent F. Yu & Parida Jewpanya & Voratas Kachitvichyanukul, 2016. "Particle swarm optimization for the multi-period cross-docking distribution problem with time windows," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 509-525, January.
    18. Fatma Essghaier & Hamid Allaoui & Gilles Goncalves, 2021. "Truck to door assignment in a shared cross-dock under uncertainty," Post-Print hal-04066589, HAL.
    19. Wang, Haibo & Alidaee, Bahram, 2019. "The multi-floor cross-dock door assignment problem: Rising challenges for the new trend in logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 30-47.
    20. Van Belle, Jan & Valckenaers, Paul & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2012. "Cross-docking: State of the art," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 827-846.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:91:y:2020:i:c:s0305048317311908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.