IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v31y2020i3d10.1007_s10845-019-01468-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search

Author

Listed:
  • Mariem Besbes

    (Quartz-Supmeca
    University of Sfax)

  • Marc Zolghadri

    (Quartz-Supmeca)

  • Roberta Costa Affonso

    (Quartz-Supmeca)

  • Faouzi Masmoudi

    (University of Sfax)

  • Mohamed Haddar

    (University of Sfax)

Abstract

This work proposes a new methodology and mathematical formulation to address the facility layout problem. The goal is to minimise the total material handling cost subjected to production-derived constraints. This cost is a function of the distance that the products should cover within the facility. The first idea is to use the $$ {\text{A}}^{ *} $$A∗ algorithm to identify the distances between workstations in a more realistic way. $$ {\text{A}}^{ *} $$A∗ determines the shortest path within the facility that contains obstacles and transportation routes. The second idea is to combine a genetic algorithm and the $$ {\text{A}}^{ *} $$A∗ algorithm with a homogenous methodology to improve the quality of the facility layouts. In an iterative way, the layout solution space is explored using the genetic algorithm. We study the impacts of the appropriate crossover and mutation operators and the values of the parameters used in this algorithm on the cost of the proposed arrangements. These operators and parameter values are fine-tuned using Monte Carlo simulations. The facility arrangements are all compared and discussed based on their material handling cost associated with the Euclidean distance, rectilinear distance, and $$ {\text{A}}^{ *} $$A∗ algorithm. Finally, we present a set of conclusions regarding the suggested methodology and discuss our future research goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-019-01468-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-019-01468-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-019-01468-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-019-01468-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hani, Y. & Amodeo, L. & Yalaoui, F. & Chen, H., 2007. "Ant colony optimization for solving an industrial layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 633-642, December.
    2. Friedrich, Christian & Klausnitzer, Armin & Lasch, Rainer, 2018. "Integrated slicing tree approach for solving the facility layout problem with input and output locations based on contour distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 837-851.
    3. Heragu, Sunderesh S. & Kusiak, Andrew, 1991. "Efficient models for the facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Yavuz A. Bozer & Russell D. Meller & Steven J. Erlebacher, 1994. "An Improvement-Type Layout Algorithm for Single and Multiple-Floor Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(7), pages 918-932, July.
    5. Jingyang Zhou & Peter E.D. Love & Kok Lay Teo & Hanbin Luo, 2017. "An exact penalty function method for optimising QAP formulation in facility layout problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2913-2929, May.
    6. Datta, Dilip & Amaral, André R.S. & Figueira, José Rui, 2011. "Single row facility layout problem using a permutation-based genetic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 388-394, September.
    7. Komarudin & Wong, Kuan Yew, 2010. "Applying Ant System for solving Unequal Area Facility Layout Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 730-746, May.
    8. Friedrich, C. & Klausnitzer, A. & Lasch, R., 2018. "Integrated slicing tree approach for solving the facility layout problem with input and output locations based on contour distance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 94867, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Kusiak, Andrew & Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1987. "The facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 229-251, June.
    10. Dunker, Thomas & Radons, Gunter & Westkamper, Engelbert, 2005. "Combining evolutionary computation and dynamic programming for solving a dynamic facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 55-69, August.
    11. Panagiotis Kouvelis & Michael W. Kim, 1992. "Unidirectional Loop Network Layout Problem in Automated Manufacturing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 533-550, June.
    12. Solimanpur, M. & Vrat, P. & Shankar, R., 2004. "Ant colony optimization algorithm to the inter-cell layout problem in cellular manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(3), pages 592-606, September.
    13. Gonçalves, José Fernando & Resende, Mauricio G.C., 2015. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm for the unequal area facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 86-107.
    14. Xie, Yue & Zhou, Shenghan & Xiao, Yiyong & Kulturel-Konak, Sadan & Konak, Abdullah, 2018. "A β-accurate linearization method of Euclidean distance for the facility layout problem with heterogeneous distance metrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 26-38.
    15. Samarghandi, Hamed & Eshghi, Kourosh, 2010. "An efficient tabu algorithm for the single row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 98-105, August.
    16. Guan, Jian & Lin, Geng, 2016. "Hybridizing variable neighborhood search with ant colony optimization for solving the single row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 899-909.
    17. Paes, Frederico Galaxe & Pessoa, Artur Alves & Vidal, Thibaut, 2017. "A hybrid genetic algorithm with decomposition phases for the Unequal Area Facility Layout Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 742-756.
    18. Anirban Kundu & Pranab K. Dan, 2012. "Metaheuristic in facility layout problems: current trend and future direction," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 238-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junqi Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Feng Chen & Silu Liu & Lixia Zhu, 2022. "A novel hybrid immune clonal selection algorithm for the constrained corridor allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 953-972, April.
    2. Xiulian Hu & Yi-Fei Chuang, 2023. "E-commerce warehouse layout optimization: systematic layout planning using a genetic algorithm," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 97-114, March.
    3. Qiaoyu Zhang & Yan Lin, 2024. "Integrating multi-agent reinforcement learning and 3D A* search for facility layout problem considering connector-assembly," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 3393-3418, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2017. "A novel version of simulated annealing based on linguistic patterns for solving facility layout problems," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/17/07, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    2. Qiaoyu Zhang & Yan Lin, 2024. "Integrating multi-agent reinforcement learning and 3D A* search for facility layout problem considering connector-assembly," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 3393-3418, October.
    3. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2021. "3D facility layout problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1065-1090, April.
    4. A. R. S. Amaral, 2022. "A heuristic approach for the double row layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1-36, September.
    5. Keller, Birgit & Buscher, Udo, 2015. "Single row layout models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 629-644.
    6. I. Jerin Leno & S. Saravana Sankar & S. G. Ponnambalam, 2018. "MIP model and elitist strategy hybrid GA–SA algorithm for layout design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 369-387, February.
    7. Hungerländer, Philipp & Anjos, Miguel F., 2015. "A semidefinite optimization-based approach for global optimization of multi-row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 46-61.
    8. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Uma Kothari & Diptesh Ghosh, 2012. "A Competitive Genetic Algorithm for Single Row Facility Layout," Working Papers id:4915, eSocialSciences.
    10. Kothari, Ravi & Ghosh, Diptesh, 2013. "Tabu search for the single row facility layout problem using exhaustive 2-opt and insertion neighborhoods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 93-100.
    11. Ramazan Şahin & Sadegh Niroomand & Esra Duygu Durmaz & Saber Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, 2020. "Mathematical formulation and hybrid meta-heuristic solution approaches for dynamic single row facility layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 313-336, December.
    12. Mehmet Burak Şenol & Ekrem Alper Murat, 2023. "A sequential solution heuristic for continuous facility layout problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 355-377, January.
    13. Anjos, Miguel F. & Vieira, Manuel V.C., 2017. "Mathematical optimization approaches for facility layout problems: The state-of-the-art and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 1-16.
    14. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    15. Hua, Hao & Hovestadt, Ludger & Tang, Peng & Li, Biao, 2019. "Integer programming for urban design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 1125-1137.
    16. Junqi Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Feng Chen & Silu Liu & Lixia Zhu, 2022. "A novel hybrid immune clonal selection algorithm for the constrained corridor allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 953-972, April.
    17. Palubeckis, Gintaras, 2015. "Fast local search for single row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 800-814.
    18. Guan, Jian & Lin, Geng, 2016. "Hybridizing variable neighborhood search with ant colony optimization for solving the single row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 899-909.
    19. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank, 2020. "Decorous combinatorial lower bounds for row layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 929-944.
    20. Philipp Hungerländer & Franz Rendl, 2013. "A computational study and survey of methods for the single-row facility layout problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-019-01468-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.