IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i10p2913-2929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exact penalty function method for optimising QAP formulation in facility layout problem

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyang Zhou
  • Peter E.D. Love
  • Kok Lay Teo
  • Hanbin Luo

Abstract

A quadratic assignment problem (QAP), which is a combinatorial optimisation problem, is developed to model the problem of locating facilities with material flows between them. The aim of solving the QAP formulation for a facility layout problem (FLP) is to increase a system’s operating efficiency by reducing material handling costs, which can be measured by interdepartmental distances and flows. The QAP-formulated FLP can be viewed as a discrete optimisation problem, where the quadratic objective function is optimised with respect to discrete decision variables subject to linear equality constraints. The conventional approach for solving this discrete optimisation problem is to use the linearisation of the quadratic objective function whereby additional discrete variables and constraints are introduced. The adoption of the linearisation process can result in a significantly increased number of variables and constraints; solving the resulting problem can therefore be challenging. In this paper, a new approach is introduced to solve this discrete optimisation problem. First, the discrete optimisation problem is transformed into an equivalent nonlinear optimisation problem involving only continuous decision variables by introducing quadratic inequality constraints. The number of variables, however, remains the same as the original problem. Then, an exact penalty function method is applied to convert this transformed continuous optimisation problem into an unconstrained continuous optimisation problem. An improved backtracking search algorithm is then developed to solve the unconstrained optimisation problem. Numerical computation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed new approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyang Zhou & Peter E.D. Love & Kok Lay Teo & Hanbin Luo, 2017. "An exact penalty function method for optimising QAP formulation in facility layout problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2913-2929, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:10:p:2913-2929
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1229068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1229068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1229068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hossein Neghabi & Farhad Ghassemi Tari, 2015. "An optimal approach for maximizing the number of adjacencies in multi floor layout problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 3462-3474, June.
    2. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    3. Yu, Junfang & Sarker, Bhaba R., 2003. "Directional decomposition heuristic for a linear machine-cell location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 142-184, August.
    4. Hassan, Mohsen MD & Hogg, Gary L, 1987. "A review of graph theory application to the facilities layout problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 291-300.
    5. Lee, Geun-Cheol & Kim, Yeong-Dae, 2000. "Algorithms for adjusting shapes of departments in block layouts on the grid-based plane," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.
    6. Zvi Drezner & Peter Hahn & Éeric Taillard, 2005. "Recent Advances for the Quadratic Assignment Problem with Special Emphasis on Instances that are Difficult for Meta-Heuristic Methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 65-94, October.
    7. Eugene L. Lawler, 1963. "The Quadratic Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 586-599, July.
    8. Kothari, Ravi & Ghosh, Diptesh, 2013. "Tabu search for the single row facility layout problem using exhaustive 2-opt and insertion neighborhoods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 93-100.
    9. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1861-1871, December.
    10. Datta, Dilip & Amaral, André R.S. & Figueira, José Rui, 2011. "Single row facility layout problem using a permutation-based genetic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 388-394, September.
    11. Fred Glover, 1975. "Improved Linear Integer Programming Formulations of Nonlinear Integer Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 455-460, December.
    12. Nicos Christofides & Enrique Benavent, 1989. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Problem on a Tree," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 760-768, October.
    13. Komarudin & Wong, Kuan Yew, 2010. "Applying Ant System for solving Unequal Area Facility Layout Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 730-746, May.
    14. Kaufman, L. & Broeckx, F., 1978. "An algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem using Bender's decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 207-211, May.
    15. Burkard, Rainer E. & Bonniger, Tilman, 1983. "A heuristic for quadratic Boolean programs with applications to quadratic assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 374-386, August.
    16. Bock, Stefan & Hoberg, Kai, 2007. "Detailed layout planning for irregularly-shaped machines with transportation path design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 693-718, March.
    17. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "Comments on ÜThe Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming ProblemsÝ," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1872-1874, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    2. T. G. Pradeepmon & Vinay V. Panicker & R. Sridharan, 2021. "A variable neighbourhood search enhanced estimation of distribution algorithm for quadratic assignment problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 203-233, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huizhen Zhang & Cesar Beltran-Royo & Liang Ma, 2013. "Solving the quadratic assignment problem by means of general purpose mixed integer linear programming solvers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 261-278, August.
    2. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank, 2020. "Decorous combinatorial lower bounds for row layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 929-944.
    3. Keller, Birgit & Buscher, Udo, 2015. "Single row layout models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 629-644.
    4. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    5. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C. & Lin, Ting-li, 1995. "A heuristic procedure for the single-row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-73, November.
    6. Nyberg, Axel & Westerlund, Tapio, 2012. "A new exact discrete linear reformulation of the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 314-319.
    7. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Krishna C. Jha & James B. Orlin & Dushyant Sharma, 2007. "Very Large-Scale Neighborhood Search for the Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 646-657, November.
    8. Hungerländer, Philipp & Anjos, Miguel F., 2015. "A semidefinite optimization-based approach for global optimization of multi-row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 46-61.
    9. Yang Wang & Wei Yang & Abraham P. Punnen & Jingbo Tian & Aihua Yin & Zhipeng Lü, 2021. "The Rank-One Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 979-996, July.
    10. Ketan Date & Rakesh Nagi, 2019. "Level 2 Reformulation Linearization Technique–Based Parallel Algorithms for Solving Large Quadratic Assignment Problems on Graphics Processing Unit Clusters," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 771-789, October.
    11. Feizollahi, Mohammad Javad & Feyzollahi, Hadi, 2015. "Robust quadratic assignment problem with budgeted uncertain flows," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 114-123.
    12. An, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Zeng, Bo, 2015. "The reliable hub-and-spoke design problem: Models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-122.
    13. Dollevoet, Twan & van Essen, J. Theresia & Glorie, Kristiaan M., 2018. "Solution methods for the tray optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1070-1084.
    14. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank & Hungerländer, Philipp & Maier, Kerstin, 2023. "Exact approaches for the combined cell layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 530-546.
    15. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    16. Alexandre Belloni & Mitchell J. Lovett & William Boulding & Richard Staelin, 2012. "Optimal Admission and Scholarship Decisions: Choosing Customized Marketing Offers to Attract a Desirable Mix of Customers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 621-636, July.
    17. Yunpeng Sun & Ruoya Jia & Asif Razzaq & Qun Bao, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Drivers of China’s geographical renewable energy development: evidence from spatial association network structure approaches," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4115-4163, December.
    18. Zhizhu Lai & Qun Yue & Zheng Wang & Dongmei Ge & Yulong Chen & Zhihong Zhou, 2022. "The min-p robust optimization approach for facility location problem under uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 1134-1160, September.
    19. Ricardo M. Lima & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2017. "On the solution of nonconvex cardinality Boolean quadratic programming problems: a computational study," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 1-37, January.
    20. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben & Maddah, Bacel & Flamand, Tülay & Azar, Jimmy, 2024. "Store-Wide space planning balancing impulse and convenience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 211-226.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:10:p:2913-2929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.