IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i1d10.1007_s13132-023-01229-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Technology Market Hotspots and Development Trends from the Perspective of Inventor Mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Hao Chang

    (National Applied Research Laboratories)

Abstract

Talent mobility implies technology transfer, and this transfer of implicit knowledge is often conducted through face-to-face contact and communication between researchers. Therefore, a flow of talent can be used to examine the transfer of valuable technology. This study adopted an inventor mobility perspective to observe technological trends in international technology transfer. Previous research on inventor mobility has either focused on the effect of inventor mobility on regional economies, knowledge flow, and the performance of manufacturers or on the distribution of inventor mobility and migration motives. However, these studies have failed to identify the technology background of investors who engaged in international mobility or to underline the technology hotspots of international mobility. This study adopted the perspective of inventor mobility and conducted a technology hotspot analysis to identify technology hotspots. Network analysis was performed to define key hotspots in a technology network, that is, to determine the positioning of each technology field according to the technology network created on the basis of the relationships between fields. The “players” at the center represented the technical hotspots, and the network-centric approach was used as the main measurement method. The study results indicated that “hot technology” inventions were primarily semiconductor devices, electric digital data processing, optical elements, pictorial communication, material analyses, and control systems. Thus, attention must be paid to and resources invested in these technologies in the future. Technology hotspots in the international technology market drive companies to rethink and restructure their internal activities such as technology development and talent acquisition. Thus, companies can combine their operations with technology hotspots in the international market to create new values and growth models. The results of this study are useful for recruiting international talents, promoting emerging technologies, and locating key technologies. The study developed an inventor mobility technology network model by adopting the perspective of inventor mobility, thereby providing references to businesses and governments when allocating R&D resources and recruiting talented people.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Hao Chang, 2024. "International Technology Market Hotspots and Development Trends from the Perspective of Inventor Mobility," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2361-2382, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01229-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01229-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01229-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01229-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janghyeok Yoon & Hyunseok Park & Kwangsoo Kim, 2013. "Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 313-331, January.
    2. Hsini Huang, 2017. "Invisible Constraints: The Relationship among Non-Competition Agreements, Inventor Mobility, and Patent Commercialization," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 341-353.
    3. Francesco Lissoni & Patrick Llerena & Maureen McKelvey & Bulat Sanditov, 2008. "Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 87-102, June.
    4. Miguelez, Ernest & Noumedem Temgoua, Claudia, 2020. "Inventor migration and knowledge flows: A two-way communication channel?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    5. Holger Graf, 2013. "Inventor Networks in Emerging Key Technologies: Information Technology vs. Semiconductors," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Guido Buenstorf & Uwe Cantner & Horst Hanusch & Michael Hutter & Hans-Walter Lorenz & Fritz Rahmeyer (ed.), The Two Sides of Innovation, edition 127, pages 55-76, Springer.
    6. Liza Ireni-Saban & Eldad Borohowitch, 2017. "Brokers and Entrepreneurs in Human Stem Cell Governance Networks in the United States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(5), pages 660-681, September.
    7. Cooper, David P., 2001. "Innovation and reciprocal externalities: information transmission via job mobility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 403-425, August.
    8. Ernest Miguélez & Rosina Moreno & Jordi Suriñach, 2010. "Inventors on the move: Tracing inventors' mobility and its spatial distribution," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(2), pages 251-274, June.
    9. Giuditta Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2014. "Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 358-375, June.
    10. Loet Leydesdorff & Wouter Nooy, 2017. "Can “hot spots” in the sciences be mapped using the dynamics of aggregated journal–journal citation Relations?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(1), pages 197-213, January.
    11. Bo Wang & Shengbo Liu & Kun Ding & Zeyuan Liu & Jing Xu, 2014. "Identifying technological topics and institution-topic distribution probability for patent competitive intelligence analysis: a case study in LTE technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 685-704, October.
    12. Bahar, Dany & Choudhury, Prithwiraj & Rapoport, Hillel, 2020. "Migrant inventors and the technological advantage of nations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    13. Johan Hombert & Adrien Matray, 2017. "The Real Effects of Lending Relationships on Innovative Firms and Inventor Mobility," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(7), pages 2413-2445.
    14. Michele Pezzoni & Francesco Lissoni & Gianluca Tarasconi, 2014. "How to kill inventors: testing the Massacrator© algorithm for inventor disambiguation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 477-504, October.
    15. Geroski, P. A. & Van Reenen, J. & Walters, C. F., 1997. "How persistently do firms innovate?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 33-48, March.
    16. Naotoshi Tsukada & Sadao Nagaoka, 2015. "Determinants of International Research Collaboration: Evidence from International Co-Inventions in Asia and Major OECD Countries," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 96-119, January.
    17. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2019. "Structural dynamics of regional innovation patterns in Europe: the role of inventors’ mobility," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 30-42, January.
    18. Orazbayev, Sultan, 2017. "International knowledge flows and the administrative barriers to mobility," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1655-1665.
    19. Riccardo Cappelli & Dirk Czarnitzki & Thorsten Doherr & Fabio Montobbio, 2019. "Inventor mobility and productivity in Italian regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 43-54, January.
    20. Paul Almeida & Bruce Kogut, 1999. "Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 905-917, July.
    21. Sari Pekkala Kerr & William R. Kerr, 2018. "Global Collaborative Patents," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 235-272, July.
    22. Pierpaolo Parrotta & Dario Pozzoli, 2012. "The effect of learning by hiring on productivity," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(1), pages 167-185, March.
    23. Cristobal Cheyre & Steven Klepper & Francisco Veloso, 2015. "Spinoffs and the Mobility of U.S. Merchant Semiconductor Inventors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 487-506, March.
    24. Janet Bercovitz & Maryann Feldman, 2008. "Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 69-89, February.
    25. Maurice Schiff & Yanling Wang, 2013. "North--South Trade-related Technology Diffusion and Productivity Growth: Are Small States Different?," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 399-414, September.
    26. Chris van Egeraat & Declan Curran, 2014. "Social Networks and Actual Knowledge Flow in the Irish Biotech Industry," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 1109-1126, June.
    27. Jaime Aboites & Claudia Díaz, 2018. "Inventors’ mobility in Mexico in the context of globalization," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1443-1461, June.
    28. Walsh, John N., 2015. "Developing new categories of knowledge acquisition, translation and dissemination by technological gatekeepers," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 594-605.
    29. Jérôme Danguy, 2017. "Globalization of innovation production: A patent-based industry analysis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 75-94.
    30. Zafer Sonmez, 2017. "Inventor mobility and the geography of knowledge flows: evidence from the US biopharmaceutical industry," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(5), pages 670-682.
    31. Jaana Rahko, 2017. "Knowledge spillovers through inventor mobility: the effect on firm-level patenting," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 585-614, June.
    32. Didem Gündoğdu & Pietro Panzarasa & Nuria Oliver & Bruno Lepri, 2019. "The bridging and bonding structures of place-centric networks: Evidence from a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    33. Neus Palomeras & Eduardo Melero, 2010. "Markets for Inventors: Learning-by-Hiring as a Driver of Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 881-895, May.
    34. Matthias Brachert & Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch & Mirko Titze, 2016. "Mapping potentials for input–output-based innovation flows in industrial clusters – an application to Germany," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 450-466, October.
    35. Guellec, Dominique & Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno v., 2001. "The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1253-1266, October.
    36. Xiaoling Sun & Kun Ding, 2018. "Identifying and tracking scientific and technological knowledge memes from citation networks of publications and patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1735-1748, September.
    37. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2019. "The nexus between inventors’ mobility and regional growth across European regions," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 457-486, December.
    38. Cirlene Maria de Matos & Eduardo Gonçalves & Ricardo da Silva Freguglia, 2021. "Knowledge diffusion channels in Brazil: The effect of inventor mobility and inventive collaboration on regional invention," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 909-932, June.
    39. Chemmanur, Thomas J. & Kong, Lei & Krishnan, Karthik & Yu, Qianqian, 2019. "Top Management Human Capital, Inventor Mobility, and Corporate Innovation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(6), pages 2383-2422, December.
    40. Scott D. Bass & Lukasz A. Kurgan, 2010. "Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(2), pages 217-241, February.
    41. Eduardo Melero & Neus Palomeras & David Wehrheim, 2020. "The Effect of Patent Protection on Inventor Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5485-5504, December.
    42. Ventura, Samuel L. & Nugent, Rebecca & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2015. "Seeing the non-stars: (Some) sources of bias in past disambiguation approaches and a new public tool leveraging labeled records," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1672-1701.
    43. Peter van den Besselaar & Ulf Sandström, 2019. "Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
    44. Di Lorenzo, Francesco & Almeida, Paul, 2017. "The role of relative performance in inter-firm mobility of inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1162-1174.
    45. Gergő Tóth & Balázs Lengyel, 2021. "Inter-firm inventor mobility and the role of co-inventor networks in producing high-impact innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 117-137, February.
    46. David Audretsch & Rosa Caiazza, 2016. "Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1247-1259, December.
    47. Stefan Wagner & Martin C. Goossen, 2018. "Knowing me, knowing you: Inventor mobility and the formation of technology-oriented alliances," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    48. Bowen Yan & Jianxi Luo, 2017. "Measuring technological distance for patent mapping," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(2), pages 423-437, February.
    49. Olof Ejermo & Torben Schubert, 2018. "Do Higher Wages Reduce Knowledge Worker's Job Mobility? Evidence for Swedish Inventors," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 108-145, January.
    50. Ernest Miguélez & Rosina Moreno, 2014. "What Attracts Knowledge Workers? The Role Of Space And Social Networks," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 33-60, January.
    51. Ruchi Sharma & Sunil Kumar Ambrammal, 2015. "International technology transfer and domestic patent policy: An empirical analysis of Indian industry," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(3), pages 165-181, July-Sepe.
    52. Scoresby, Richard B. & Park, Haemin, 2021. "The joint effects of individual and firm level knowledge attributes on inventor mobility to entrepreneurial and established firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 218-230.
    53. Wang, Qinyu Ryan & Zheng, Yanfeng, 2022. "Nest without birds: Inventor mobility and the left-behind patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Varshney, Mayank & Jain, Amit, 2023. "Understanding “reverse” knowledge flows following inventor exit in the semiconductor industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Liu, Shasha & Kong, Dongmin & Zhang, Jian, 2024. "Air pollution-induced brain drain: Evidence from inventor mobility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Wai, Sebastian, 2023. "Inventor mobility and spillovers in the early semiconductor industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Varshney, Mayank, 2023. "Learning-by-hiring: How do rival firms learn from focal firm's hiring," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    5. Yang, Chia-Hsuan & Nugent, Rebecca & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2016. "Gains from others’ losses: Technology trajectories and the global division of firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 724-745.
    6. Varshney, Mayank & Jain, Amit, 2023. "Technology acquisition following inventor exit in the biopharmaceutical industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Neus Palomeras & David Wehrheim, 2021. "The strategic allocation of inventors to R&D collaborations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 144-169, January.
    8. Valentina Di Iasio & Ernest Miguelez, 2022. "The ties that bind and transform: knowledge remittances, relatedness and the direction of technical change [Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 423-448.
    9. Hidalgo, César A., 2023. "The policy implications of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    10. Gidehag, Anton & Lodefalk, Magnus, 2016. "Recruiting for Small Business Growth: Micro-level Evidence," Working Papers 2016:6, Örebro University, School of Business.
    11. Cristelli, Gabriele & Lissoni, Francesco, 2020. "Free movement of inventors: open-border policy and innovation in Switzerland," MPRA Paper 107433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Martin Ganco & Rosemarie H. Ziedonis & Rajshree Agarwal, 2015. "More stars stay, but the brightest ones still leave: Job hopping in the shadow of patent enforcement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 659-685, May.
    13. Fernandez-Zubieta, Ana & Geuna, Aldo & Lawson, Cornelia, 2015. "What do We Know of the Mobility of Research Scientists and of its Impact on Scientific Production," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201522, University of Turin.
    14. Grinza, Elena & Quatraro, Francesco, 2019. "Workers’ replacements and firms’ innovation dynamics: New evidence from Italian matched longitudinal data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    15. Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Ding, Ding & Thulin, Per, 2020. "Labour market mobility, knowledge diffusion and innovation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    16. Jennifer Hunt & Iain M. Cockburn & James Bessen, 2024. "Is Distance from Innovation a Barrier to the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence?," NBER Working Papers 33022, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Massimiliano CODA-ZABETTA & Christian CHACUA & Francesco LISSONI & Ernest MIGUELEZ & Julio RAFFO & Deyun YIN, 2021. "The missing link: international migration in global clusters of innovation," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2021-02, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    18. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Chunmian Ge & Ke-Wei Huang & Ivan P. L. Png, 2016. "Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 232-253, January.
    19. Kremena Slavova & Andrea Fosfuri & Julio O. De Castro, 2016. "Learning by Hiring: The Effects of Scientists’ Inbound Mobility on Research Performance in Academia," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 72-89, February.
    20. Jérôme Danguy, 2014. "Who collaborates with whom: the role of technological distance in international innovation," Working Papers TIMES² 2014-010, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01229-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.