IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v53y2019i1p43-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventor mobility and productivity in Italian regions

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Cappelli
  • Dirk Czarnitzki
  • Thorsten Doherr
  • Fabio Montobbio

Abstract

This paper describes the interregional and international mobility of inventors in Italy and estimates its impact on total factor productivity (TFP) at the regional level for the period 1996–2011. A new database of mobile inventors is constructed and, using a set of geographically based instruments to address endogeneity, it shows that inventor in- and outflows affect regional TFP growth. Moreover, the positive effects of the inventors’ mobility (inflow) between different applicants take more time to materialize (relative to movements within the same company). Finally, the negative effects of inventor outflows are mainly driven by mobility between applicants.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Cappelli & Dirk Czarnitzki & Thorsten Doherr & Fabio Montobbio, 2019. "Inventor mobility and productivity in Italian regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 43-54, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:53:y:2019:i:1:p:43-54
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1445847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2018.1445847
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2018.1445847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu-Hao Chang, 2024. "International Technology Market Hotspots and Development Trends from the Perspective of Inventor Mobility," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2361-2382, March.
    2. Lara Agostini & Federico Caviggioli & Francesco Galati & Barbara Bigliardi, 2020. "A social perspective of knowledge-based innovation: mobility and agglomeration. Introduction to the special section," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1309-1323, October.
    3. Xing Gao & Keyu Zhai, 2021. "Spatial Mechanisms of Regional Innovation Mobility in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 247-270, July.
    4. Riccardo Cappelli & Fabio Montobbio & Andrea Morrison, 2021. "Unemployment resistance across EU regions: the role of technological and human capital," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 147-178, January.
    5. Shuai Liu & Xiao-Yu Xu & Kai Zhao & Li-Ming Xiao & Qi Li, 2021. "Understanding the Complexity of Regional Innovation Capacity Dynamics in China: From the Perspective of Hidden Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Benjamin Balsmeier & Lee Fleming & Matt Marx & Seungryul Ryan Shin, 2020. "Startups, Unicorns, and the Local Inflow of Inventors," NBER Working Papers 27605, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Kairui Zheng & Yijie Li & Xiaohui Xin, 2022. "The Influencing Mechanism of High-Speed Rail on Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Cirlene Maria de Matos & Eduardo Gonçalves & Ricardo da Silva Freguglia, 2021. "Knowledge diffusion channels in Brazil: The effect of inventor mobility and inventive collaboration on regional invention," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 909-932, June.
    9. Bisset, Jordan & Czarnitzki, Dirk & Doherr, Thorsten, 2024. "Inventor mobility under uncertainty," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:53:y:2019:i:1:p:43-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.