IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v22y2021i4d10.1007_s10902-020-00301-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of the Fun For Wellness Online Behavioral Intervention to Promote Subjective Well-Being in Adults with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas D. Myers

    (Michigan State University)

  • Isaac Prilleltensky

    (University of Miami)

  • Adam McMahon

    (University of Miami)

  • Seungmin Lee

    (Michigan State University)

  • Samantha Dietz

    (University of Miami)

  • Ora Prilleltensky

    (University of Miami)

  • Karin A. Pfeiffer

    (Michigan State University)

  • André G. Bateman

    (Michigan State University)

  • Ahnalee M. Brincks

    (Michigan State University)

Abstract

Fun For Wellness is a self-efficacy theory-based online behavioral intervention developed to promote growth in well-being and physical activity by providing capability-enhancing opportunities to participants. Evidence has been provided for the efficacy of Fun For Wellness to promote subjective well-being in adults in a relatively controlled setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Fun For Wellness to increase subjective well-being in adults with obesity in the United States of America in a relatively uncontrolled setting. The data described in this manuscript were collected within a more broadly focused trial: the Well-Being and Physical Activity Study (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03194854, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03194854 ). The study design was a large-scale, prospective, double-blind, parallel group randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited through an online panel recruitment company. Data collection occurred at three time points: baseline, 30 days and 60 days after baseline. Participants (N = 667) who were assigned to the Fun For Wellness group (nFFW = 331) were provided with 30 days of 24 h access to the online intervention (i.e., from baseline to 30 days after baseline). Participants assigned to the usual care group (nusual care = 336) were asked to conduct their lives as usual. There was evidence for a positive indirect effect of Fun For Wellness on both occupational and psychological subjective well-being at 60 days after baseline through occupational and psychological well-being self-efficacy at 30 days after baseline, respectively. There was evidence for a positive direct effect of Fun For Wellness on both community (d = 0.33) and physical (d = 0.26) subjective well-being at 60 days after baseline. Results from this study provided some initial evidence for both the effectiveness (e.g., promoting community, occupational, physical, and psychological subjective well-being), and the ineffectiveness (e.g., failing to promote interpersonal, economic, and overall subjective well-being), of the Fun For Wellness intervention for increasing subjective well-being in adults with obesity in the United States of America.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas D. Myers & Isaac Prilleltensky & Adam McMahon & Seungmin Lee & Samantha Dietz & Ora Prilleltensky & Karin A. Pfeiffer & André G. Bateman & Ahnalee M. Brincks, 2021. "Effectiveness of the Fun For Wellness Online Behavioral Intervention to Promote Subjective Well-Being in Adults with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1905-1923, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:22:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10902-020-00301-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00301-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-020-00301-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-020-00301-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Hancock, 2001. "Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 373-388, September.
    2. Adorée Durayappah, 2011. "The 3P Model: A General Theory of Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 681-716, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loredana R. Diaconu-Gherasim & Cristina R. Mardari, 2022. "Personality Traits and Time Perspectives: Implications for Adolescents’ Mental Health and Mental Illness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 101-124, January.
    2. Laura M. Stapleton & Ji Seung Yang & Gregory R. Hancock, 2016. "Construct Meaning in Multilevel Settings," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(5), pages 481-520, October.
    3. Manasi Murthy Mittinty & Pedro H. R. Santiago & Lisa Jamieson, 2022. "Assessment of Pain-Related Fear in Indigenous Australian Populations Using the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-9 (FPQ-9)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Siti Aisyah Ramli & Bahaman Abu Samah & Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah & Khairuddin Idris & Hayrol Azril Mohammed Shaffril, 2017. "Urban Youth Subjective Well-Being in Malaysia: Potential Factors," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 538-543, April.
    5. Elena Bárcena-Martín & Cortés Aguilar Alexandra & Ana I. Moro Egido, 2013. "The role of proximity and social comparisons on subjective well-being," ThE Papers 13/10, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    6. Dandara Gabriela Haag & Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago & Davi Manzini Macedo & João Luiz Bastos & Yin Paradies & Lisa Jamieson, 2020. "Development and initial psychometric assessment of the race-related attitudes and multiculturalism scale in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Igor Esnaola & Manuel Benito & Iratxe Antonio-Agirre & Eloisa Ballina & Margarita Lorenzo, 2019. "Gender, Age and Cross-Cultural Differences in Life Satisfaction: a Comparison Between Spain and Mexico," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(6), pages 1935-1949, December.
    8. Panita Suavansri & Nipat Pichayayothin & Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa & Poonsub Areekit & Chureerat Nilchantuk & Torin S. Jones & Joanna J. French & Emily Mam & Jessie B. Moore & Catherine A. Heaney, 2022. "Well-being in Thailand: A Culturally Driven Grounded Inquiry Exploration of a Complex Construct," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(6), pages 3327-3347, December.
    9. Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia & Halkos, George & Matsiori, Steriani, 2019. "How do motives and knowledge relate to intention to perform environmental behavior? Assessing the mediating role of constraints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Ethan McMahan & Seungah Ryu & Incheol Choi, 2014. "Lay Conceptions of Well-Being Among Undergraduate Students from the United States and South Korea: Culture-Level Differences and Correlates," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 321-339, October.
    11. Andrea Conchado Peiró & José Miguel Carot Sierra & Elena Vázquez Barrachina, 2020. "Competences of Flexible Professionals: Validation of an Invariant Instrument across Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Kim, Kyoungmi (Kate) & Dugar, Kranti Kumar & Fox, Jennine, 2022. "What makes an object smart? Conceptualization, development, and validation of a scale to measure the Smartness of a Thing (SoT)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 337-354.
    13. Nørskov, Sladjana & Damholdt, Malene F. & Ulhøi, John P. & Jensen, Morten Berg & Mathiasen, Mia Krogager & Ess, Charles M. & Seibt, Johanna, 2022. "Employers’ and applicants’ fairness perceptions in job interviews: using a teleoperated robot as a fair proxy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Karel Frömel & Dorota Groffik & Josef Mitáš & Jan Dygrýn & Petr Valach & Michal Šafář, 2020. "Active Travel of Czech and Polish Adolescents in Relation to Their Well-Being: Support for Physical Activity and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy & Alexandra Aguilar & Ana Moro-Egido, 2014. "Social Interactions and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 527-554, June.
    16. Otero, Inmaculada & Salgado, Jesús F. & Moscoso, Silvia, 2022. "Cognitive reflection, cognitive intelligence, and cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:22:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10902-020-00301-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.