IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v17y2022i6d10.1007_s11482-022-10067-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-being in Thailand: A Culturally Driven Grounded Inquiry Exploration of a Complex Construct

Author

Listed:
  • Panita Suavansri

    (Chulalongkorn University)

  • Nipat Pichayayothin

    (Chulalongkorn University)

  • Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine)

  • Poonsub Areekit

    (Chulalongkorn University)

  • Chureerat Nilchantuk

    (Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University)

  • Torin S. Jones

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine)

  • Joanna J. French

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine)

  • Emily Mam

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine)

  • Jessie B. Moore

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine)

  • Catherine A. Heaney

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine
    Stanford University)

Abstract

Background Well-being has long been recognized as a key construct in human history. Quantitative studies have been limited in their ability to uncover contextual and cultural nuances that can be leveraged to inform the promotion of well-being. The present study employed a qualitative approach informed by narrative inquiry to understand how individuals in a rapidly developing Asian country experience what it means to be well and what contributes to or detracts from their well-being. Methods A purposeful sample of 50 Thai adults living in Bangkok shared their personal stories of times when they experienced high and low levels of well-being. Data were inductively coded and analysed to identify key domains of participants’ well-being and their inter-connections. Results The results reflect three layers of well-being. Social relationships (i.e., family, friends and acquaintances, and relationships at work or education) are at the center of well-being in Thailand, connecting and supporting a second layer of eight constituent domains of well-being (experience of emotions, sense of self, finances, self-care, demands and responsibilities, thoughts and feelings about the future, personal health, spirituality). The third layer is composed of the societal and physical contexts that are formative for well-being. Conclusions Our findings suggest both universal and culturally unique components of well-being among Thai adults. Implications for the promotion of well-being in Thailand are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Panita Suavansri & Nipat Pichayayothin & Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa & Poonsub Areekit & Chureerat Nilchantuk & Torin S. Jones & Joanna J. French & Emily Mam & Jessie B. Moore & Catherine A. Heaney, 2022. "Well-being in Thailand: A Culturally Driven Grounded Inquiry Exploration of a Complex Construct," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(6), pages 3327-3347, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:17:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11482-022-10067-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-022-10067-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-022-10067-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-022-10067-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leena Eklund Karlsson & Kristine Crondahl & Fredrik Sunnemark & Åsa Andersson, 2013. "The Meaning of Health, Well-Being, and Quality of Life Perceived by Roma People in West Sweden," Societies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Darunee Jongudomkarn & Laura Camfield, 2006. "Exploring the Quality of Life of People in North Eastern and Southern Thailand," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 489-529, September.
    3. Ann Le Mare & Buapun Promphaking & Jonathan Rigg, 2015. "Returning Home: The Middle‐Income Trap and Gendered Norms in Thailand," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 285-306, March.
    4. Adorée Durayappah, 2011. "The 3P Model: A General Theory of Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 681-716, August.
    5. Phillip Niffenegger & Songpol Kulviwat & Napatsawan Engchanil, 2006. "Conflicting Cultural Imperatives in Modern Thailand: Global Perspectives," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 403-420, October.
    6. Ed Diener & Derrick Wirtz & William Tov & Chu Kim-Prieto & Dong-won Choi & Shigehiro Oishi & Robert Biswas-Diener, 2010. "New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 143-156, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maw–Der Foo & Marilyn A. Uy & Charles Murnieks, 2015. "Beyond Affective Valence: Untangling Valence and Activation Influences on Opportunity Identification," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 407-431, March.
    2. Merrick Powell & Kirk N. Olsen & William Forde Thompson, 2023. "Music, Pleasure, and Meaning: The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motivations for Music (HEMM) Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Nelli Ferenczi & Tara C Marshall, 2013. "Exploring Attachment to the “Homeland” and Its Association with Heritage Culture Identification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Erin Percival Carter & Stephanie Welcomer, 2021. "Designing and Distinguishing Meaningful Artisan Food Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Aaron Tham & David Fleischman & Peter Jenner, 2018. "Spilling the social capital beans: a comparative case study of coffee service enterprises within Asia-Pacific," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 150-173, March.
    6. Annamaria Di Fabio & Maureen E. Kenny, 2018. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: A Key Resource for Promoting Well-Being in a Shifting Work Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Asude Malkoç & Aynur Kesen Mutlu, 2019. "Mediating the Effect of Cognitive Flexibility in the Relationship between Psychological Well-Being and Self-Confidence: A Study on Turkish University Students," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 278-278, December.
    8. Kamlesh Singh & Mahima Raina, 2020. "Demographic Correlates and Validation of PERMA and WEMWBS Scales in Indian Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(4), pages 1175-1186, August.
    9. Hezhi Chen & Zhijia Zeng, 2023. "Seeking Pleasure is Good, but Avoiding Pain is Bad: Distinguishing Hedonic Approach from Hedonic Avoidance Orientations," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2377-2393, October.
    10. Jacky C. K. Ng & Algae K. Y. Au & Helen S. M. Wong & Carmen K. M. Sum & Victor C. Y. Lau, 2021. "Does Dispositional Envy Make You Flourish More (or Less) in Life? An Examination of Its Longitudinal Impact and Mediating Mechanisms Among Adolescents and Young Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1089-1117, March.
    11. Ana Junça-Silva, 2022. "Friends with Benefits: The Positive Consequences of Pet-Friendly Practices for Workers’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    12. Wenjie Li & Linting Zhang & Chengcheng Li & Ningzhe Zhu & Jingjing Zhao & Feng Kong, 2022. "Pursuing Pleasure or Meaning: A Cross-Lagged Analysis of Happiness Motives and Well-being in Adolescents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 3981-3999, December.
    13. Du, Yao & Sun, Guibo & Heinen, Eva, 2024. "Does subjective wellbeing modify travel behaviour changes among older people in response to a new metro line?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Reuben D. Rusk, 2022. "An Adaptive Motivation Approach to Understanding the ‘How’ and ‘Why’ of Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Isabell Koinig, 2022. "Picturing Mental Health on Instagram: Insights from a Quantitative Study Using Different Content Formats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    16. Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Gabriele Giorgi & Dante Castillo Guajardo & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2022. "Special Issue “Rethinking the Subjective Wellbeing for a New Workplace Scenario”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-6, April.
    17. Liila Taruffi, 2021. "Mind-Wandering during Personal Music Listening in Everyday Life: Music-Evoked Emotions Predict Thought Valence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Vento, Elli & Tammi, Timo & McCabe, Scott & Komppula, Raija, 2020. "Re-evaluating well-being outcomes of social tourism: Evidence from Finland," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Sakari Kainulainen, 2022. "Concurrent Assessments of Individuals’ Affect and Contentment and the Correlation of these Estimates to Overall Happiness at Specific Moments," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 3151-3174, October.
    20. Annamaria Di Fabio & Donald H. Saklofske, 2019. "Positive Relational Management for Sustainable Development: Beyond Personality Traits—The Contribution of Emotional Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:17:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11482-022-10067-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.