IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v42y2025i1d10.1007_s10460-024-10623-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of local knowledge in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) to the well‑being of cocoa families in Colombia: a response from the relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcia

    (Universidad de La Amazonia
    Universidad de La Amazonia
    Grupo de Investigaciones Agroecosistemas y Conservación en Bosques Amazónicos-GAIA)

  • Isabel Gutiérrez-Montes

    (CATIE—Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza)

  • Juan Carlos Suárez Salazar

    (Universidad de La Amazonia
    Grupo de Investigaciones Agroecosistemas y Conservación en Bosques Amazónicos-GAIA)

  • Fernando Casanoves

    (Universidad de La Amazonia
    CATIE—Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza)

  • David Ricardo Gutiérrez Suárez

    (Universidad de La Amazonia
    Grupo de Investigaciones Agroecosistemas y Conservación en Bosques Amazónicos-GAIA)

  • Héctor Eduardo Hernández-Núñez

    (Universidad de La Amazonia
    Grupo de Investigaciones Agroecosistemas y Conservación en Bosques Amazónicos-GAIA)

  • Cornelia Butler Flora

    (Iowa State University)

  • Nicole Sibelet

    (CIRAD, UMR Innovation
    Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro)

Abstract

The concept of well-being of rural families is part of a theory under construction in which new theoretical elements are constantly being incorporated. This research aims to determine the influence of farmers’ knowledge on the well‑being of cocoa growing families in the departments of Santander, Huila, Meta and Caquetá, Colombia. Four categories of farmers were identified with different levels of knowledge in the management of cocoa cultivation obtained through a cluster analysis. The well-being of cocoa farmers, understood as the balance in the capital endowment of rural households, was obtained through the application of a semi-structured interview with 49 variables of human, cultural, social, political, natural, built, and financial capitals. The results show that cocoa knowledge is heterogeneous in the study area, with a slight improvement towards harvesting, post-harvest and transformation links. There is a positive relationship between cocoa knowledge and the well-being of cocoa farming families. Thus, producers with greater integral knowledge, with emphasis on post-harvest and bean transformation links, showed greater well-being. The Random Forest analysis identified that human capital (political, social, human, and cultural) made the greatest contribution to well-being. The findings show that cocoa knowledge contributes to the well-being of rural households to the extent that it favors vertical relationships (linkages with local governments) and horizontal relationships of producers (participation of association managers, sharing knowledge with friends, neighbors and partners, and cocoa training).

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcia & Isabel Gutiérrez-Montes & Juan Carlos Suárez Salazar & Fernando Casanoves & David Ricardo Gutiérrez Suárez & Héctor Eduardo Hernández-Núñez & Cornelia Butler Flora & , 2025. "Contribution of local knowledge in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) to the well‑being of cocoa families in Colombia: a response from the relationship," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 461-484, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10623-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-024-10623-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-024-10623-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-024-10623-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10623-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.