IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v60y2014i3p531-550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A penalty approximation method for a semilinear parabolic double obstacle problem

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Zhou
  • S. Wang
  • X. Yang

Abstract

In this work, we present a novel power penalty method for the approximation of a global solution to a double obstacle complementarity problem involving a semilinear parabolic differential operator and a bounded feasible solution set. We first rewrite the double obstacle complementarity problem as a double obstacle variational inequality problem. Then, we construct a semilinear parabolic partial differential equation (penalized equation) for approximating the variational inequality problem. We prove that the solution to the penalized equation converges to that of the variational inequality problem and obtain a convergence rate that is corresponding to the power used in the formulation of the penalized equation. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate the theoretical findings. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Zhou & S. Wang & X. Yang, 2014. "A penalty approximation method for a semilinear parabolic double obstacle problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 531-550, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:60:y:2014:i:3:p:531-550
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-013-0122-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-013-0122-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-013-0122-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Wang & X. Q. Yang & K. L. Teo, 2006. "Power Penalty Method for a Linear Complementarity Problem Arising from American Option Valuation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 227-254, May.
    2. W. Li & S. Wang, 2009. "Penalty Approach to the HJB Equation Arising in European Stock Option Pricing with Proportional Transaction Costs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 279-293, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshioka, Hidekazu & Yaegashi, Yuta, 2019. "A finite difference scheme for variational inequalities arising in stochastic control problems with several singular control variables," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 40-66.
    2. Jinxia Cen & Tahar Haddad & Van Thien Nguyen & Shengda Zeng, 2022. "Simultaneous distributed-boundary optimal control problems driven by nonlinear complementarity systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 783-805, November.
    3. Yarui Duan & Song Wang & Yuying Zhou, 2021. "A power penalty approach to a mixed quasilinear elliptic complementarity problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 901-918, December.
    4. Chen, Wen & Wang, Song, 2017. "A power penalty method for a 2D fractional partial differential linear complementarity problem governing two-asset American option pricing," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 305(C), pages 174-187.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Li & Song Wang, 2014. "A numerical method for pricing European options with proportional transaction costs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 59-78, September.
    2. Lesmana, Donny Citra & Wang, Song, 2015. "Penalty approach to a nonlinear obstacle problem governing American put option valuation under transaction costs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 318-330.
    3. Song Wang, 2015. "A penalty approach to a discretized double obstacle problem with derivative constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 775-790, August.
    4. Kaiwen Meng & Xiaoqi Yang, 2015. "First- and Second-Order Necessary Conditions Via Exact Penalty Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 720-752, June.
    5. Anna Clevenhaus & Matthias Ehrhardt & Michael Günther & Daniel Ševčovič, 2020. "Pricing American Options with a Non-Constant Penalty Parameter," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-7, June.
    6. Boshi Tian & Yaohua Hu & Xiaoqi Yang, 2015. "A box-constrained differentiable penalty method for nonlinear complementarity problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 729-747, August.
    7. Roy Cerqueti & Daniele Marazzina & Marco Ventura, 2016. "Optimal Investment in Research and Development Under Uncertainty," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 296-309, January.
    8. Attipoe, David Sena & Tambue, Antoine, 2021. "Convergence of the mimetic finite difference and fitted mimetic finite difference method for options pricing," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
    9. Zhe Sun & Zhe Liu & Xiaoqi Yang, 2015. "On power penalty methods for linear complementarity problems arising from American option pricing," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 165-180, September.
    10. Shuhua Chang & Xinyu Wang, 2015. "Modelling and Computation in the Valuation of Carbon Derivatives with Stochastic Convenience Yields," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-35, May.
    11. R. S. Burachik & X. Q. Yang & Y. Y. Zhou, 2017. "Existence of Augmented Lagrange Multipliers for Semi-infinite Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 471-503, May.
    12. K. Zhang, 2012. "Applying a Power Penalty Method to Numerically Pricing American Bond Options," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 278-291, July.
    13. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He & XiaoPing Lu, 2018. "A new integral equation formulation for American put options," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 483-490, March.
    14. Rock Stephane Koffi & Antoine Tambue, 2022. "A Fitted L-Multi-Point Flux Approximation Method for Pricing Options," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 633-663, August.
    15. Yan, Dong & Lin, Sha & Hu, Zhihao & Yang, Ben-Zhang, 2022. "Pricing American options with stochastic volatility and small nonlinear price impact: A PDE approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Jose Cruz & Daniel Sevcovic, 2020. "On solutions of a partial integro-differential equation in Bessel potential spaces with applications in option pricing models," Papers 2003.03851, arXiv.org.
    17. Lu, Xiaoping & Yan, Dong & Zhu, Song-Ping, 2022. "Optimal exercise of American puts with transaction costs under utility maximization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    18. W. Li & S. Wang, 2009. "Penalty Approach to the HJB Equation Arising in European Stock Option Pricing with Proportional Transaction Costs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 279-293, November.
    19. Pedro Polvora & Daniel Sevcovic, 2021. "Utility indifference Option Pricing Model with a Non-Constant Risk-Aversion under Transaction Costs and Its Numerical Approximation," Papers 2108.12598, arXiv.org.
    20. Yuan Li & Hai-Shan Han & Dan-Dan Yang, 2014. "A Penalized-Equation-Based Generalized Newton Method for Solving Absolute-Value Linear Complementarity Problems," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-10, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:60:y:2014:i:3:p:531-550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.