IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i6p124-d370993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing American Options with a Non-Constant Penalty Parameter

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Clevenhaus

    (Applied Mathematics & Numerical Analysis Group, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal , Germany)

  • Matthias Ehrhardt

    (Applied Mathematics & Numerical Analysis Group, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal , Germany)

  • Michael Günther

    (Applied Mathematics & Numerical Analysis Group, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal , Germany)

  • Daniel Ševčovič

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Division of Applied Mathematics, Comenius University, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

As the American early exercise results in a free boundary problem, in this article we add a penalty term to obtain a partial differential equation, and we also focus on an improved definition of the penalty term for American options. We replace the constant penalty parameter with a time-dependent function. The novelty and advantage of our approach consists in introducing a bounded, time-dependent penalty function, enabling us to construct an efficient, stable, and adaptive numerical approximation scheme, while in contrast, the existing standard approach to the penalisation of the American put option-free boundary problem involves a constant penalty parameter. To gain insight into the accuracy of our proposed extension, we compare the solution of the extension to standard reference solutions from the literature. This illustrates the improvement of using a penalty function instead of a penalising constant.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Clevenhaus & Matthias Ehrhardt & Michael Günther & Daniel Ševčovič, 2020. "Pricing American Options with a Non-Constant Penalty Parameter," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-7, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:124-:d:370993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/6/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/6/124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Lauko & Daniel Sevcovic, 2010. "Comparison of numerical and analytical approximations of the early exercise boundary of the American put option," Papers 1002.0979, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2010.
    2. J. D. Evans & R. Kuske & Joseph B. Keller, 2002. "American options on assets with dividends near expiry," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 219-237, July.
    3. S. Wang & X. Q. Yang & K. L. Teo, 2006. "Power Penalty Method for a Linear Complementarity Problem Arising from American Option Valuation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 227-254, May.
    4. Song-Ping Zhu, 2006. "A New Analytical Approximation Formula For The Optimal Exercise Boundary Of American Put Options," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(07), pages 1141-1177.
    5. Schwartz, Eduardo S., 1977. "The valuation of warrants: Implementing a new approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 79-93, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Polvora & Daniel Sevcovic, 2021. "Utility indifference Option Pricing Model with a Non-Constant Risk-Aversion under Transaction Costs and Its Numerical Approximation," Papers 2108.12598, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Cruz & Daniel Sevcovic, 2020. "On solutions of a partial integro-differential equation in Bessel potential spaces with applications in option pricing models," Papers 2003.03851, arXiv.org.
    2. Denis Veliu & Roberto De Marchis & Mario Marino & Antonio Luciano Martire, 2022. "An Alternative Numerical Scheme to Approximate the Early Exercise Boundary of American Options," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Maria do Rosário Grossinho & Yaser Faghan Kord & Daniel Sevcovic, 2017. "Pricing American Call Option by the Black-Scholes Equation with a Nonlinear Volatility Function," Working Papers REM 2017/18, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    4. Maria do Rosario Grossinho & Yaser Kord Faghan & Daniel Sevcovic, 2016. "Pricing Perpetual Put Options by the Black-Scholes Equation with a Nonlinear Volatility Function," Papers 1611.00885, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    5. Minqiang Li, 2010. "Analytical approximations for the critical stock prices of American options: a performance comparison," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 75-99, April.
    6. Maria do Rosário Grossinho & Yaser Kord Faghan & Daniel Ševčovič, 2017. "Pricing Perpetual Put Options by the Black–Scholes Equation with a Nonlinear Volatility Function," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 24(4), pages 291-308, December.
    7. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He & XiaoPing Lu, 2018. "A new integral equation formulation for American put options," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 483-490, March.
    8. Maria do Rosário Grossinho & Yaser Faghan Kord & Daniel Sevcovic, 2017. "Pricing Perpetual Put Options by the Black-Scholes Equation with a Nonlinear Volatility Function," Working Papers REM 2017/19, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    9. Zhu, Song-Ping & Chen, Wen-Ting, 2013. "An inverse finite element method for pricing American options," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 231-250.
    10. Maria do Rosario Grossinho & Yaser Faghan Kord & Daniel Sevcovic, 2017. "Pricing American Call Options by the Black-Scholes Equation with a Nonlinear Volatility Function," Papers 1707.00358, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.
    11. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.
    12. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He, 2018. "A hybrid computational approach for option pricing," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Yongxin Yang & Yu Zheng & Timothy M. Hospedales, 2016. "Gated Neural Networks for Option Pricing: Rationality by Design," Papers 1609.07472, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    14. Jérôme Detemple, 2014. "Optimal Exercise for Derivative Securities," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 459-487, December.
    15. Iftekhar Hasan & Sudipto Sarkar, 2002. "Banks' option to lend, interest rate sensitivity, and credit availability," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 213-250, October.
    16. Jin, Ting & Yang, Xiangfeng, 2021. "Monotonicity theorem for the uncertain fractional differential equation and application to uncertain financial market," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 203-221.
    17. Zhiqiang Zhou & Hongying Wu, 2018. "Laplace Transform Method for Pricing American CEV Strangles Option with Two Free Boundaries," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, September.
    18. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    19. Li, Chenxu & Ye, Yongxin, 2019. "Pricing and Exercising American Options: an Asymptotic Expansion Approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Zhongdi Cen & Anbo Le & Aimin Xu, 2012. "A Second-Order Difference Scheme for the Penalized Black–Scholes Equation Governing American Put Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 49-62, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:124-:d:370993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.