IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v18y2016i3d10.1007_s10796-014-9541-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An awareness-based meta-mechanism for e-commerce buyer coalitions

Author

Listed:
  • Laor Boongasame

    (Bangkok University)

  • Farhad Daneshgar

    (Australia and Bangkok University
    University of New South Wales)

Abstract

Many of the existing theories in e-Commerce and Buyer Coalition assume that all persons involved adopt self-interested strategies by seeking their own gains using environmental/market information. In reality however, such information may not be complete. Also, each person’s knowledge may differ from others. By adopting a collaborative perspective towards the buyer coalition process, this study introduces and validates an awareness-based mechanism for buyer coalitions that generates various outcomes corresponding to different levels of awareness of the collaborating roles within the process, where ‘awareness’ is defined in terms of the knowledge of the collaboration context of the coalition. The theoretical foundation of the study is an overlapping space of Game Theory (Hassan et al. Information Systems Frontiers 16(4):523–542, 2014), e-Commerce (Yang et al. Information Systems Frontiers 16(1):7–18, 2014), and Knowledge Management (Daneshgar & Wang Knowledge Based Systems 20(8):736–744, 2007). The research methodology is design science using simulation software for demonstration and proof of concept. Results indicate that higher levels of awareness of buyers do not necessarily increase total coalition discount but it enables individual buyers to make more opportunistic and calculated decisions to protect their personal interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Laor Boongasame & Farhad Daneshgar, 2016. "An awareness-based meta-mechanism for e-commerce buyer coalitions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 529-540, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-014-9541-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-014-9541-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-014-9541-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-014-9541-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nisan, Noam & Ronen, Amir, 2001. "Algorithmic Mechanism Design," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 35(1-2), pages 166-196, April.
    2. Joan E. van Aken, 2004. "Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field‐Tested and Grounded Technological Rules," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 219-246, March.
    3. Laor Boongasame & Farhad Daneshgar, 2013. "A collaborative platform for buyer coalition: Introducing the Awareness-based Buyer Coalition (ABC) system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 89-98, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    2. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    3. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen & Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen & Christoph Müller-Bloch, 2023. "Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Xiayan Cheng & Rongheng Li & Yunxia Zhou, 0. "Tighter price of anarchy for selfish task allocation on selfish machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-32.
    5. Tobias Wulfert & Robert Woroch & Gero Strobel & Thorsten Schoormann & Leonardo Banh, 2024. "E-commerce ecosystems as catalysts for sustainability: A multi-case analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Dalila Cisco Collatto & Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Ione Ghislene Bentz, 2018. "Is Action Design Research Indeed Necessary? Analysis and Synergies Between Action Research and Design Science Research," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 239-267, June.
    7. Levin, Hagay & Schapira, Michael & Zohar, Aviv, 2006. "The Strategic Justification for BGP," MPRA Paper 2110, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Shahar Dobzinski & Noam Nisan & Michael Schapira, 2005. "Truthful Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions," Discussion Paper Series dp408, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    9. M. Y. Jumba & Y. S. Haruna & U. O. Aliyu & A. L. Amao, 2024. "Application of Games Theory in Modelling of Nigerian Electricity Market," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(5), pages 1129-1140, May.
    10. Marcos Leandro Hoffmann Souza & Luis Henrique Rodrigues & Maria Isabel Wolf Motta Morandi, 2018. "Design of a System Dynamics Model to Analyze the Styrene Demand in the Brazilian Market," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 87-104, February.
    11. Langley, David J. & Zirngiebl, Marthe & Sbeih, Janosch & Devoldere, Bart, 2017. "Trajectories to reconcile sharing and commercialization in the maker movement," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 783-794.
    12. Aziz, Haris & Chan, Hau & Lee, Barton E. & Parkes, David C., 2020. "The capacity constrained facility location problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 478-490.
    13. Rachel R. Chen & Robin O. Roundy & Rachel Q. Zhang & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2005. "Efficient Auction Mechanisms for Supply Chain Procurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 467-482, March.
    14. Zhiling Guo & Gary J. Koehler & Andrew B. Whinston, 2012. "A Computational Analysis of Bundle Trading Markets Design for Distributed Resource Allocation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 823-843, September.
    15. Yuval Emek & Michal Feldman, 2007. "Computing an Optimal Contract in Simple Technologies," Discussion Paper Series dp452, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    16. Parikshit De & Manipushpak Mitra, 2017. "Incentives and justice for sequencing problems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 64(2), pages 239-264, August.
    17. Nils Urbach & Tobias Würz, 2012. "How to Steer the IT Outsourcing Provider," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(5), pages 247-259, October.
    18. Lia Patrício & Jorge Grenha Teixeira & Josina Vink, 2019. "A service design approach to healthcare innovation: from decision-making to sense-making and institutional change," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 115-120, June.
    19. Vinicius Luiz Ferraz Minatogawa & Matheus Munhoz Vieira Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Rosley Anholon & Ruy Quadros & Orlando Durán & Antonio Batocchio, 2019. "Operationalizing Business Model Innovation through Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Wada, Kentaro & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2013. "A hybrid implementation mechanism of tradable network permits system which obviates path enumeration: An auction mechanism with day-to-day capacity control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-014-9541-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.