IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v33y2023i1d10.1007_s12525-023-00628-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry

Author

Listed:
  • Raffaele Fabio Ciriello

    (The University of Sydney Business School)

  • Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen

    (IT University of Copenhagen)

  • Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen

    (Roskilde University)

  • Christoph Müller-Bloch

    (ESSEC Business School)

Abstract

Initially designed to protect intellectual property (IP) of digitalized information goods such as music, games, or books, existing centralized digital rights management (DRM) systems mostly serve the interests of major publishers, with scant inclusion of rights owners, creators, and consumers. Although various blockchain-based DRM systems have been proposed, most of them mirror existing counterproductive IP restrictions. Analyzing the music industry as a case in point, this paper proposes design principles for blockchain-based DRM systems that provide an integrated and flexible solution by enabling transparent music licensing structures, consistent and complete rights metadata, and efficient and transparent royalty payout. The solution can be achieved by storing rights metadata on a public distributed ledger, by validating metadata through a consensus mechanism on a permissioned blockchain, and by algorithmically enforcing royalty payout via stablecoin through a smart contract. The design principles were evaluated by industry experts, validating their benefit for the music industry by increasing surplus value that is currently destroyed through previous suboptimal designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen & Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen & Christoph Müller-Bloch, 2023. "Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00628-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-023-00628-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-023-00628-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-023-00628-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dinah A. Vernik & Devavrat Purohit & Preyas S. Desai, 2011. "Music Downloads and the Flip Side of Digital Rights Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1011-1027, November.
    2. Brooke, Tony, 2014. "Descriptive metadata in the music industry: Why it is broken and how to fix it — Part two," Journal of Digital Media Management, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 2(4), pages 359-374, March.
    3. Venkata Marella & Bikesh Upreti & Jani Merikivi & Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen, 2020. "Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 259-271, June.
    4. Helliar, Christine V. & Crawford, Louise & Rocca, Laura & Teodori, Claudio & Veneziani, Monica, 2020. "Permissionless and permissioned blockchain diffusion," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Laurina Zhang, 2018. "Intellectual Property Strategy and the Long Tail: Evidence from the Recorded Music Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 24-42, January.
    6. Barry Eichengreen, 2020. "From Commodity to Fiat and Now to Crypto: What Does History Tell Us?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Bernard Yeung (ed.), DIGITAL CURRENCY ECONOMICS AND POLICY, chapter 4, pages 17-39, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Janssen, Marijn & Weerakkody, Vishanth & Ismagilova, Elvira & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Irani, Zahir, 2020. "A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 302-309.
    8. Warr, Richard & Goode, Mark M.H., 2011. "Is the music industry stuck between rock and a hard place? The role of the Internet and three possible scenarios," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 126-131.
    9. Richard K. Lyons & Ganesh Viswanath-Natraj, 2020. "What Keeps Stablecoins Stable?," NBER Working Papers 27136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Joseph G. Walls & George R. Widmeyer & Omar A. El Sawy, 1992. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 36-59, March.
    11. John Venable & Jan Pries-Heje & Richard Baskerville, 2016. "FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, January.
    12. Nikolaos Kapsoulis & Alexandros Psychas & Georgios Palaiokrassas & Achilleas Marinakis & Antonios Litke & Theodora Varvarigou & Charalampos Bouchlis & Amaryllis Raouzaiou & Gonçal Calvo & Jordi Escude, 2020. "Consortium Blockchain Smart Contracts for Musical Rights Governance in a Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) Use Case," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Brooke, Tony, 2014. "Descriptive metadata in the music industry: Why it is broken and how to fix it — Part one," Journal of Digital Media Management, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 2(3), pages 263-282, February.
    14. Joan E. van Aken, 2004. "Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field‐Tested and Grounded Technological Rules," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 219-246, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago Nunes & Paulo Rupino da Cunha & João Mendes de Abreu & Joana Duarte & Ana Corte-Real, 2024. "Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in Healthcare: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hubert Österle & Boris Otto, 2010. "Consortium Research," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 283-293, October.
    2. Kim, Jin-Hyuk & Leung, Tin Cheuk, 2021. "Eliminating digital rights management from the E-book market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Hendrik Haße & Hendrik Valk & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2022. "Design Principles for Shared Digital Twins in Distributed Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 751-772, December.
    4. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexander Richter, 2019. "Scenario-Based Design Theorizing," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(1), pages 31-50, February.
    5. Richard Baskerville & Jan Pries-Heje, 2010. "Explanatory Design Theory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 271-282, October.
    6. Nils Urbach & Tobias Würz, 2012. "How to Steer the IT Outsourcing Provider," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(5), pages 247-259, October.
    7. Tobias Wulfert & Robert Woroch & Gero Strobel & Sarah Seufert & Frederik Möller, 2022. "Developing design principles to standardize e-commerce ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1813-1842, December.
    8. Dirk G. Baur & Thomas Dimpfl, 2021. "The volatility of Bitcoin and its role as a medium of exchange and a store of value," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2663-2683, November.
    9. Díaz, Antonio & Esparcia, Carlos & Huélamo, Diego, 2023. "Stablecoins as a tool to mitigate the downside risk of cryptocurrency portfolios," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Stefano Za & Eusebio Scornavacca & Jessie Pallud, 2022. "Enhancing workplace competence acquisition through a persuasive system," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 819-846, December.
    11. Julius Peter Landwehr & Niklas Kühl & Jannis Walk & Mario Gnädig, 2022. "Design Knowledge for Deep-Learning-Enabled Image-Based Decision Support Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 707-728, December.
    12. Aaron W. Baur, 0. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    13. Chen, R. & Chen, K. & Ou, Carol, 2023. "Facilitating interorganizational trust in strategic alliances by leveraging blockchain-based systems: Case studies of two eastern banks," Other publications TiSEM 85ecf99c-76f0-416e-9604-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Julia Brasse & Hanna Rebecca Broder & Maximilian Förster & Mathias Klier & Irina Sigler, 2023. "Explainable artificial intelligence in information systems: A review of the status quo and future research directions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Aaron W. Baur, 2017. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 231-251, April.
    16. Binh Nguyen Thanh & Thai Nguyen Vu Hong & Huy Pham & Thanh Nguyen Cong & Thu Pham Thi Anh, 2023. "Are the stabilities of stablecoins connected?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 515-525, September.
    17. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    18. Luis Aguiar & Jörg Claussen & Christian Peukert, 2018. "Catch Me If You Can: Effectiveness and Consequences of Online Copyright Enforcement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 656-678, September.
    19. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    20. Hendrik Hilpert & Johann Kranz & Matthias Schumann, 2013. "Leveraging Green IS in Logistics," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(5), pages 315-325, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital rights management; Music industry; Decentralization; Blockchain; Design principles; Scenario-based design; Design science research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00628-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.