IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v7y2016i1d10.1007_s13198-015-0405-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability assessment and improvement of air circuit breaker (ACB) mechanism by identifying and eliminating the root causes

Author

Listed:
  • Santosh B. Rane

    (Sardar Patel College of Engineering)

  • Yahya A. M. Narvel

    (Sardar Patel College of Engineering)

Abstract

Air circuit breakers (ACBs) are widely used as electro-mechanical devices to protect an electrical circuit from damage caused by overload or short circuit. Its basic function is to isolate a fault condition by interrupting current flow and if it fails to function, then it may cause a major accident. The major functions in ACB relies on mechanical drives and linkages, hence assessing the reliability of these drives and links is of key importance. This paper demonstrates the process of assessment as well as improvement of Reliability of ACB by exploring and eliminating the root causes of failures based on various relevant tools. Reliability assessment of existing and improved ACB mechanism was carried out by using Lifetime distribution. Root causes were analyzed using FTA, Ishikawa diagram, CE Matrix, and Pareto chart. After analyzing various causes, the root cause of failures in ACB was malfunctioning of unidirectional bearing. Elimination of root cause increased the reliability from 17.61 to 87.82 % for 20,000 operations. The drastic increase in reliability of ACB after eliminating the root cause of failure served its purpose effectively and helped in securing a strong position in market. This research deals with reliability improvement of ACB that can cut-off/supply electricity from the substation. Improving reliability of such product reduces these possible risks and indirectly helps the society particularly in critical areas like Hospitals, Airports, Process industries, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Santosh B. Rane & Yahya A. M. Narvel, 2016. "Reliability assessment and improvement of air circuit breaker (ACB) mechanism by identifying and eliminating the root causes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(1), pages 305-321, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-015-0405-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-015-0405-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-015-0405-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-015-0405-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2007. "A flexible Weibull extension," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 719-726.
    2. Mohammadian, S. Hossein & Aït-Kadi, Daoud, 2010. "Design stage confirmation of lifetime improvement for newly modified products through accelerated life testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 897-905.
    3. Yadav, Om Prakash & Singh, Nanua & Goel, Parveen S., 2006. "Reliability demonstration test planning: A three dimensional consideration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(8), pages 882-893.
    4. Chen, Colin, 2006. "Tests of fit for the three-parameter lognormal distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 1418-1440, March.
    5. Bichon, Barron J. & McFarland, John M. & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2011. "Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1386-1395.
    6. Sudripto De & Arindam Das & Ashish Sureka, 2010. "Product failure root cause analysis during warranty analysis for integrated product design and quality improvement for early results in downturn economy," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3/4), pages 235-253.
    7. Jiang, R. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2011. "A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1619-1626.
    8. Zhang, Tieling & Dwight, Richard, 2013. "Choosing an optimal model for failure data analysis by graphical approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 111-123.
    9. Pang, Wan-Kai & Leung, Ping-Kei & Huang, Wei-Kwang & Liu, Wei, 2005. "On interval estimation of the coefficient of variation for the three-parameter Weibull, lognormal and gamma distribution: A simulation-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 367-377, July.
    10. Remenyte-Prescott, R. & Andrews, J.D. & Chung, P.W.H., 2010. "An efficient phased mission reliability analysis for autonomous vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 226-235.
    11. Kim, Jin Seon & Yum, Bong-Jin, 2008. "Selection between Weibull and lognormal distributions: A comparative simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 477-485, December.
    12. Contini, Sergio & Matuzas, Vaidas, 2011. "Analysis of large fault trees based on functional decomposition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 383-390.
    13. Bartlett, L.M. & Hurdle, E.E. & Kelly, E.M., 2009. "Integrated system fault diagnostics utilising digraph and fault tree-based approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1107-1115.
    14. Ibáñez-Llano, Cristina & Rauzy, Antoine & Meléndez, Enrique & Nieto, Francisco, 2010. "A reduction approach to improve the quantification of linked fault trees through binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1314-1323.
    15. Vera, J. Fernando & Di­az-Garci­a, Jose A., 2008. "A global simulated annealing heuristic for the three-parameter lognormal maximum likelihood estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5055-5065, August.
    16. Nagatsuka, Hideki & Kamakura, Toshinari & Balakrishnan, N., 2013. "A consistent method of estimation for the three-parameter Weibull distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 210-226.
    17. Basak, Prasanta & Basak, Indrani & Balakrishnan, N., 2009. "Estimation for the three-parameter lognormal distribution based on progressively censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3580-3592, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santosh B. Rane & Yahya Abdul Majid Narvel, 2022. "Data-driven decision making with Blockchain-IoT integrated architecture: a project resource management agility perspective of industry 4.0," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 1005-1023, April.
    2. Mehdi Tavakoli & Mehdi Nafar, 2021. "Modification of the FFTA method for calculating and analyzing the human reliability of maintenance groups in power transmission grids," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1221-1234, December.
    3. Sainath G. Bidikar & Santosh B. Rane & Prathamesh R. Potdar, 2022. "Product development using Design for Six Sigma approach: case study in switchgear industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 203-230, February.
    4. Ajinkya Shirurkar & Yogesh Patil & D. Davidson Jebaseelan, 2019. "Reliability improvement of fork biasing spring in MCCB mechanism," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 491-498, August.
    5. Santosh B. Rane & Sandesh Wavhal & Prathamesh R. Potdar, 2023. "Integration of Lean Six Sigma with Internet of Things (IoT) for productivity improvement: a case study of contactor manufacturing industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1990-2018, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santosh B. Rane & Yahya A.M. Narvel & Niloy Khatua, 2017. "Development of mechanism for mounting secondary isolating contacts (SICs) in air circuit breakers (ACBs) with high operational reliability," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1816-1831, November.
    2. Ajinkya Shirurkar & Yogesh Patil & D. Davidson Jebaseelan, 2019. "Reliability improvement of fork biasing spring in MCCB mechanism," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 491-498, August.
    3. Almalki, Saad J. & Nadarajah, Saralees, 2014. "Modifications of the Weibull distribution: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 32-55.
    4. Kim, Jin Seon & Yum, Bong-Jin, 2008. "Selection between Weibull and lognormal distributions: A comparative simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 477-485, December.
    5. He, Bo & Cui, Weimin & Du, Xiaofeng, 2016. "An additive modified Weibull distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 28-37.
    6. Filippo Domma & Francesca Condino & Božidar V. Popović, 2017. "A new generalized weighted Weibull distribution with decreasing, increasing, upside-down bathtub, N-shape and M-shape hazard rate," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(16), pages 2978-2993, December.
    7. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    8. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Reliability analysis of multi-trigger binary systems subject to competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 9-17.
    9. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    11. Menz, Morgane & Gogu, Christian & Dubreuil, Sylvain & Bartoli, Nathalie & Morio, Jérôme, 2020. "Adaptive coupling of reduced basis modeling and Kriging based active learning methods for reliability analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a BWR plant system at startup stage  - analysis by the GO-FLOW methodology with consideration of loop structures and phased mission problem -," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    14. Hadi Saboori & Ghobad Barmalzan & Seyyed Masih Ayat, 2020. "Generalized Modified Inverse Weibull Distribution: Its Properties and Applications," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 247-269, November.
    15. Gauss M. Cordeiro & Giovana O. Silva & Edwin M. M. Ortega, 2016. "An extended-G geometric family," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Li, Shumin & Si, Shubin & Dui, Hongyan & Cai, Zhiqiang & Sun, Shudong, 2014. "A novel decision diagrams extension method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-115.
    17. Huan Yu & Jun Yang & Yu Zhao, 2018. "Reliability of nonrepairable phased-mission systems with common bus performance sharing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 647-660, December.
    18. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2009. "Balancing burn-in and mission times in environments with catastrophic and repairable failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1314-1321.
    19. Refah Alotaibi & Mazen Nassar & Hoda Rezk & Ahmed Elshahhat, 2022. "Inferences and Engineering Applications of Alpha Power Weibull Distribution Using Progressive Type-II Censoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Xing, Liudong & Shrestha, Akhilesh & Dai, Yuanshun, 2011. "Exact combinatorial reliability analysis of dynamic systems with sequence-dependent failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1375-1385.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-015-0405-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.