IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v95y2010i3p226-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient phased mission reliability analysis for autonomous vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Remenyte-Prescott, R.
  • Andrews, J.D.
  • Chung, P.W.H.

Abstract

Autonomous systems are becoming more commonly used, especially in hazardous situations. Such systems are expected to make their own decisions about future actions when some capabilities degrade due to failures of their subsystems. Such decisions are made without human input, therefore they need to be well-informed in a short time when the situation is analysed and future consequences of the failure are estimated. The future planning of the mission should take account of the likelihood of mission failure. The reliability analysis for autonomous systems can be performed using the methodologies developed for phased mission analysis, where the causes of failure for each phase in the mission can be expressed by fault trees.

Suggested Citation

  • Remenyte-Prescott, R. & Andrews, J.D. & Chung, P.W.H., 2010. "An efficient phased mission reliability analysis for autonomous vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 226-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:95:y:2010:i:3:p:226-235
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832009002397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2009.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J D Andrews, 2008. "A ternary decision diagram method to calculate the component contributions to the failure of systems undergoing phased missions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 173-187, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrews, J.D. & Poole, J. & Chen, W.H., 2013. "Fast mission reliability prediction for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 3-9.
    2. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Reliability analysis of multi-trigger binary systems subject to competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 9-17.
    3. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Santosh B. Rane & Yahya A. M. Narvel, 2016. "Reliability assessment and improvement of air circuit breaker (ACB) mechanism by identifying and eliminating the root causes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(1), pages 305-321, December.
    5. Peng, Rui & Zhai, Qingqing & Xing, Liudong & Yang, Jun, 2014. "Reliability of demand-based phased-mission systems subject to fault level coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 18-25.
    6. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a BWR plant system at startup stage  - analysis by the GO-FLOW methodology with consideration of loop structures and phased mission problem -," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Wang, Chaonan, 2012. "Reliability of k-out-of-n systems with phased-mission requirements and imperfect fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-50.
    8. Feng, Qiang & Liu, Meng & Dui, Hongyan & Ren, Yi & Sun, Bo & Yang, Dezhen & Wang, Zili, 2022. "Importance measure-based phased mission reliability and UAV number optimization for swarm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Huan Yu & Jun Yang & Yu Zhao, 2018. "Reliability of nonrepairable phased-mission systems with common bus performance sharing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 647-660, December.
    10. Xing, Liudong & Shrestha, Akhilesh & Dai, Yuanshun, 2011. "Exact combinatorial reliability analysis of dynamic systems with sequence-dependent failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1375-1385.
    11. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "BDD-based reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with internal/external common-cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 145-153.
    12. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2011. "A methodology for throughput capacity analysis of a production facility considering environment condition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1637-1646.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:95:y:2010:i:3:p:226-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.