IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijlaec/v65y2022i4d10.1007_s41027-022-00409-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Principles and Standards of Labor Law as a Basis for Improving Labor Legislation of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Malvina V. Danylova

    (Research Institute of Social Security, Politics, Law, Finance and Business)

  • Oleg P. Denega

    (Ad Rem Lex Law Firm LLC)

  • Maxym O. Danylov

    (Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs)

  • Khrystyna Ju. Dzhura

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)

  • Artem I. Derevyanko

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)

Abstract

The European vector of development of our state obliges the domestic legislature to take into account the positive experience of guaranteeing a high level of protection of labor rights of workers in the context of globalization of the labor market. Therefore, the reform of labor legislation in Ukraine should take into account the principles of international labor law. The methodological basis of this work includes general philosophical approaches, as well as a set of general scientific and special legal research methods. The choice of approaches and methods was determined by the multifaceted nature of the objective and subject of research. The purpose of the work is to study international standards for regulating organizational and managerial relations in labor law. To achieve our goal, we aimed to identify and characterize the directions and standards and principles of organization and management of labor, which are generally accepted by the world community. A number of provisions of the article can be used as a methodological basis for studying and solving applied issues of labor law.

Suggested Citation

  • Malvina V. Danylova & Oleg P. Denega & Maxym O. Danylov & Khrystyna Ju. Dzhura & Artem I. Derevyanko, 2022. "International Principles and Standards of Labor Law as a Basis for Improving Labor Legislation of Ukraine," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(4), pages 1121-1136, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:65:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41027-022-00409-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s41027-022-00409-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41027-022-00409-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41027-022-00409-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Stewart & Jim Stanford, 2017. "Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 420-437, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Mousa & Walid Chaouali & Monowar Mahmood, 2023. "The Inclusion of Gig Employees and their Career Satisfaction: Do Individual and Collaborative Job Crafting Play a Role?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1055-1068, September.
    2. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    3. Alex Veen & Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods, 2020. "Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 388-406, June.
    4. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    5. Farah Naz & Dieter Bögenhold, 2018. "A contested terrain: Re/conceptualising the well-being of homeworkers," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 328-345, September.
    6. Won, Jongho & Lee, Daeho & Lee, Junmin, 2023. "Understanding experiences of food-delivery-platform workers under algorithmic management using topic modeling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Victor Wong & Tat Chor Au-Yeung, 2019. "Autonomous precarity or precarious autonomy? Dilemmas of young workers in Hong Kong," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(2), pages 241-261, June.
    8. Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods & Alex Veen, 2020. "‘I’m my own boss…’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1643-1661, November.
    9. Darja Reuschke & Carol Ekinsmyth, 2021. "New spatialities of work in the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2177-2187, August.
    10. Tan, Zhi Ming & Aggarwal, Nikita & Cowls, Josh & Morley, Jessica & Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano, 2021. "The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    12. Daniel Belanche & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2021. "The role of customers in the gig economy: how perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(1), pages 45-75, March.
    13. Millán, José María & Lyalkov, Serhiy & Burke, Andrew & Millán, Ana & van Stel, André, 2021. "‘Digital divide’ among European entrepreneurs: Which types benefit most from ICT implementation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 533-547.
    14. Joe Isaac, 2018. "Why Are Australian Wages Lagging and What Can Be Done About It?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 51(2), pages 175-190, June.
    15. J.S. Keshminder & Md Aslam Mia & Mohammad Nourani & Miao Zhang, 2022. "Gig employment in the Malaysian manufacturing industry: a cross‐sectional analysis," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 36(1), pages 48-66, May.
    16. Zoe Hitzig & Benjamin Niswonger, 2022. "Optimal Defaults, Limited Enforcement and the Regulation of Contracts," Papers 2203.01233, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    17. Rolf, Steven & O'Reilly, Jacqueline & Meryon, Marc, 2022. "Towards privatized social and employment protections in the platform economy? Evidence from the UK courier sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    18. Martins, Antje & Riordan, Tyler & Dolnicar, Sara, 2020. "A post-COVID-19 model of tourism and hospitality workforce resilience," SocArXiv 4quga, Center for Open Science.
    19. Bilgrami, A. & Cutler, H. & Sinha, K., 2021. "Do standardised workplace health and safety laws and increased enforcement activities reduce the probability of receiving workers' compensation?," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 21/08, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    20. Jim Stanford, 2019. "A turning point for labour market policy in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(2), pages 177-199, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:65:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41027-022-00409-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.