IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i11d10.1007_s10668-022-02577-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Okra tree crop agroforestry model: economic and environmental impact

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Hafiz All Amin

    (Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University
    Sustainable Energy Management, Prince of Songkla University)

  • Most. Mottakina Akter

    (Prince of Songkla University)

  • Warangkana Jutidamrongphan

    (Prince of Songkla University
    Center of Excellence On Hazardous Substance Management (HSM))

  • Kua-anan Techato

    (Prince of Songkla University
    Center of Excellence On Hazardous Substance Management (HSM))

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) is a beneficial vegetable and oil crop that has found valuable use as food, paper, medicine, and oil. However, because of climate change, a lack of better okra cultivars that can resist drought has hampered okra production in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and across the world. This study aimed to investigate the economic production of this vegetable in a forest setting. The okra (A. esculentus L.) experiment was conducted underneath three forest trees (i.e. Albizia lebbeck, Melia azedarach, and Leucaena leucocephala) in the agroforestry area. A single-factor Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was utilised. The sample was then separated into three groups: okra-L. leucocephala agroforestry, okra-M. azedarach agroforestry, and okra-A. lebbeck agroforestry. The findings of the study revealed that okra production had differed significantly in three agroforestry practices. The fresh okra yield was highest (10.20 ton/ha) in the okra-A. lebbeck agroforestry. The okra-L. leucocephala agroforestry (9.10 ton/ha) came in second, while the lowest yield was in the okra-M. azedarach agroforestry (8.90 ton/ha). Moreover, the okra-A. lebbeck agroforestry recorded the maximum benefit–cost ratio (3.97) for economic performance. This ratio was 21% and 14% higher compared to the respective performance of the okra-M. azedarach agroforestry and okra-L. leucocephala agroforestry. However, the highest amount of carbon sequestration (238.90 ton/ha/yr) was measured in the okra-M. azedarach agroforestry as well as (229.80 ton/ha/yr) in the okra-A. lebbeck agroforestry practice. Finally, the okra-A. lebbeck agroforestry practice would significantly increase production, touching financial benefit and ensuring sound environmental quality using the vacant woodlot space.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Hafiz All Amin & Most. Mottakina Akter & Warangkana Jutidamrongphan & Kua-anan Techato, 2023. "Okra tree crop agroforestry model: economic and environmental impact," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12527-12542, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02577-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02577-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02577-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02577-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timsina, J. & Wolf, J. & Guilpart, N. & van Bussel, L.G.J. & Grassini, P. & van Wart, J. & Hossain, A. & Rashid, H. & Islam, S. & van Ittersum, M.K., 2018. "Can Bangladesh produce enough cereals to meet future demand?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 36-44.
    2. M Kadir & Jubaidur Rahman & MI Riad & MK Alam, 2021. "Intercropping Chilli With Groundnut In Char Land," Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 79-81, July.
    3. R. Warren & J. VanDerWal & J. Price & J. A. Welbergen & I. Atkinson & J. Ramirez-Villegas & T. J. Osborn & A. Jarvis & L. P. Shoo & S. E. Williams & J. Lowe, 2013. "Quantifying the benefit of early climate change mitigation in avoiding biodiversity loss," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 678-682, July.
    4. Josef Maroušek & Anna Maroušková & Tomáš Zoubek & Petr Bartoš, 2022. "Economic impacts of soil fertility degradation by traces of iron from drinking water treatment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4835-4844, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:sae:envval:v:25:y:2016:i:4:p:465-483 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. F. Castro-Llanos & G. Hyman & J. Rubiano & J. Ramirez-Villegas & H. Achicanoy, 2019. "Climate change favors rice production at higher elevations in Colombia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1401-1430, December.
    3. Marko Ahteensuu & Sami Aikio & Pedro Cardoso & Marko Hyvärinen & Maria Hällfors & Susanna Lehvävirta & Leif Schulman & Elina Vaara, 2015. "Quantitative tools and simultaneous actions needed for species conservation under climate change–reply to Shoo et al. (2013)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 1-7, March.
    4. Castro-Santa, Juana & Moros, Lina & Exadaktylos, Filippos & Mantilla, César, 2024. "Early climate mitigation as a social dilemma," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 810-824.
    5. Ehsan Rahimi & Pinliang Dong, 2023. "Identifying barriers and pinch-points of large mammal corridors in Iran," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 285-297, June.
    6. Rubaiya Binte Mostafiz & Ryozo Noguchi & Tofael Ahamed, 2021. "Calorie-based seasonal multicrop land suitability analysis for regional food nutrition security in Bangladesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 757-795, October.
    7. Ayllón, Daniel & Railsback, Steven F. & Vincenzi, Simone & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Almodóvar, Ana & Grimm, Volker, 2016. "InSTREAM-Gen: Modelling eco-evolutionary dynamics of trout populations under anthropogenic environmental change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 36-53.
    8. Gary W. Yohe, 2017. "Characterizing transient temperature trajectories for assessing the value of achieving alternative temperature targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 469-479, December.
    9. Soltani, A. & Alimagham, S.M. & Nehbandani, A. & Torabi, B. & Zeinali, E. & Zand, E. & Ghassemi, S. & Vadez, V. & Sinclair, T.R. & van Ittersum, M.K., 2020. "Modeling plant production at country level as affected by availability and productivity of land and water," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Paul Oldham & Stephen Hall & Oscar Forero, 2013. "Biological Diversity in the Patent System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    11. D. A. Elston & M. J. Brewer & B. Martay & A. Johnston & P. A. Henrys & J. R. Bell & R. Harrington & D. Monteith & T. M. Brereton & K. L. Boughey & J. W. Pearce-Higgins, 2017. "A New Approach to Modelling the Relationship Between Annual Population Abundance Indices and Weather Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 427-445, December.
    12. Beaumont, Linda J. & Graham, Erin & Duursma, Daisy Englert & Wilson, Peter D. & Cabrelli, Abigail & Baumgartner, John B. & Hallgren, Willow & Esperón-Rodríguez, Manuel & Nipperess, David A. & Warren, , 2016. "Which species distribution models are more (or less) likely to project broad-scale, climate-induced shifts in species ranges?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 135-146.
    13. Khan Rubayet Rahaman & Md. Sultan Mahmud & Bishawjit Mallick, 2020. "Challenges of Testing COVID-19 Cases in Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. R. Warren & J. Price & J. VanDerWal & S. Cornelius & H. Sohl, 2018. "The implications of the United Nations Paris Agreement on climate change for globally significant biodiversity areas," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 395-409, April.
    15. Haruka Ohashi & Tomoko Hasegawa & Akiko Hirata & Shinichiro Fujimori & Kiyoshi Takahashi & Ikutaro Tsuyama & Katsuhiro Nakao & Yuji Kominami & Nobuyuki Tanaka & Yasuaki Hijioka & Tetsuya Matsui, 2019. "Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Alauddin, Mohammad & Tisdell, Clement & Sarker, Md. Abdur Rashid, 2021. "Do trends in Bangladeshi rice yields support Conway’s hypotheses about the consequences of modern agroecosystems?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 342-354.
    17. Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Hossain, Akbar & Timsina, Jagadish & Biswas, Sujit Kumar & Malone, Sparkle L. & Alam, Md. Khairul & Loescher, Henry W. & Bazzaz, Mahfuz, 2020. "Alternate furrow irrigation can maintain grain yield and nutrient content, and increase crop water productivity in dry season maize in sub-tropical climate of South Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    18. Shahidul Islam & Subhadip Ghosh & Mohua Podder, 2022. "Fifty years of agricultural development in Bangladesh: a comparison with India and Pakistan," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-41, July.
    19. Mohammad Hasan Mobarok & Wyatt Thompson & Theodoros Skevas, 2021. "COVID-19 and Policy Impacts on the Bangladesh Rice Market and Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Ana Lopez & Emma Suckling & Leonard Smith, 2014. "Robustness of pattern scaled climate change scenarios for adaptation decision support," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 555-566, February.
    21. Wang, Hongzhang & Ren, Hao & Zhang, Lihua & Zhao, Yali & Liu, Yuee & He, Qijin & Li, Geng & Han, Kun & Zhang, Jiwang & Zhao, Bin & Ren, Baizhao & Liu, Peng, 2023. "A sustainable approach to narrowing the summer maize yield gap experienced by smallholders in the North China Plain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02577-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.