IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v89y2024i3d10.1007_s10589-024-00605-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaled-PAKKT sequential optimality condition for multiobjective problems and its application to an Augmented Lagrangian method

Author

Listed:
  • G. A. Carrizo

    (National University of the South (UNS))

  • N. S. Fazzio

    (Department of Mathematics, FCE, National University of La Plata)

  • M. D. Sánchez

    (University of La Plata)

  • M. L. Schuverdt

    (Department of Mathematics, FCE, National University of La Plata)

Abstract

Based on the recently introduced Scaled Positive Approximate Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition for single objective problems, we derive a sequential necessary optimality condition for multiobjective problems with equality and inequality constraints as well as additional abstract set constraints. These necessary sequential optimality conditions for multiobjective problems are subject to the same requirements as ordinary (pointwise) optimization conditions: we show that the updated Scaled Positive Approximate Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition is necessary for a local weak Pareto point to the problem. Furthermore, we propose a variant of the classical Augmented Lagrangian method for multiobjective problems. Our theoretical framework does not require any scalarization. We also discuss the convergence properties of our algorithm with regard to feasibility and global optimality without any convexity assumption. Finally, some numerical results are given to illustrate the practical viability of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • G. A. Carrizo & N. S. Fazzio & M. D. Sánchez & M. L. Schuverdt, 2024. "Scaled-PAKKT sequential optimality condition for multiobjective problems and its application to an Augmented Lagrangian method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 769-803, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:89:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-024-00605-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-024-00605-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-024-00605-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-024-00605-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Feng & Shengjie Li, 2018. "An approximate strong KKT condition for multiobjective optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(3), pages 489-509, October.
    2. Leschine, Thomas M. & Wallenius, Hannele & Verdini, William A., 1992. "Interactive multiobjective analysis and assimilative capacity-based ocean disposal decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 278-289, January.
    3. Christian Kanzow & Daniel Steck, 2018. "Augmented Lagrangian and exact penalty methods for quasi-variational inequalities," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 801-824, April.
    4. Giorgio Giorgi & Bienvenido Jiménez & Vicente Novo, 2016. "Approximate Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Condition in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 70-89, October.
    5. Giorgio Giorgi & Cesare Zuccotti, 2012. "On the use of some tangent cones and sets in vector optimization," Quaderni di Dipartimento 169, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    6. E. Carrizosa & J. B. G. Frenk, 1998. "Dominating Sets for Convex Functions with Some Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 281-295, February.
    7. Gabriel Haeser & María Laura Schuverdt, 2011. "On Approximate KKT Condition and its Extension to Continuous Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 528-539, June.
    8. G. Bigi & M. Pappalardo, 1999. "Regularity Conditions in Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 83-96, July.
    9. G. Cocchi & M. Lapucci, 2020. "An augmented Lagrangian algorithm for multi-objective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 29-56, September.
    10. E. F. Campana & M. Diez & G. Liuzzi & S. Lucidi & R. Pellegrini & V. Piccialli & F. Rinaldi & A. Serani, 2018. "A multi-objective DIRECT algorithm for ship hull optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 53-72, September.
    11. G. Cocchi & G. Liuzzi & S. Lucidi & M. Sciandrone, 2020. "On the convergence of steepest descent methods for multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Lapucci & Pierluigi Mansueto, 2023. "A limited memory Quasi-Newton approach for multi-objective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 33-73, May.
    2. Roberto Andreani & Ellen H. Fukuda & Gabriel Haeser & Daiana O. Santos & Leonardo D. Secchin, 2024. "Optimality Conditions for Nonlinear Second-Order Cone Programming and Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 1-33, January.
    3. G. Cocchi & M. Lapucci, 2020. "An augmented Lagrangian algorithm for multi-objective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 29-56, September.
    4. Min Feng & Shengjie Li, 2018. "An approximate strong KKT condition for multiobjective optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(3), pages 489-509, October.
    5. Gabriele Eichfelder & Leo Warnow, 2021. "Proximity measures based on KKT points for constrained multi-objective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 63-86, May.
    6. Ellen H. Fukuda & L. M. Graña Drummond & Fernanda M. P. Raupp, 2016. "An external penalty-type method for multicriteria," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(2), pages 493-513, July.
    7. Gabriel Haeser & Alberto Ramos, 2020. "Constraint Qualifications for Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Conditions in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 469-487, November.
    8. Andrea Cristofari & Marianna Santis & Stefano Lucidi, 2024. "On Necessary Optimality Conditions for Sets of Points in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 126-145, October.
    9. P. Kesarwani & P. K. Shukla & J. Dutta & K. Deb, 2022. "Approximations for Pareto and Proper Pareto solutions and their KKT conditions," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(1), pages 123-148, August.
    10. Ellen Fukuda & L. Graña Drummond, 2013. "Inexact projected gradient method for vector optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 473-493, April.
    11. N. Mahdavi-Amiri & F. Salehi Sadaghiani, 2017. "Strictly feasible solutions and strict complementarity in multiple objective linear optimization," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 303-326, September.
    12. Maria C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2016. "On the Fritz John saddle point problem for differentiable multiobjective optimization," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 917-933, December.
    13. G. L. Yi & Y. K. Sui, 2016. "An Adaptive Approach to Adjust Constraint Bounds and its Application in Structural Topology Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 656-670, May.
    14. Roberto Andreani & José Mario Martínez & Alberto Ramos & Paulo J. S. Silva, 2018. "Strict Constraint Qualifications and Sequential Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 693-717, August.
    15. María C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2011. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 332-351, May.
    16. Giorgio, 2019. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Smooth Nonlinear Programming Problems," DEM Working Papers Series 171, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    17. Min Feng & Shengjie Li & Jie Wang, 2022. "On Tucker-Type Alternative Theorems and Necessary Optimality Conditions for Nonsmooth Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 480-503, November.
    18. Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1997. "Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-36, April.
    19. J.M. Martínez & B.F. Svaiter, 2003. "A Practical Optimality Condition Without Constraint Qualifications for Nonlinear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 117-133, July.
    20. Giorgio Giorgi & Bienvenido Jiménez & Vicente Novo, 2014. "Some Notes on Approximate Optimality Conditions in Scalar and Vector Optimization Problems," DEM Working Papers Series 095, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:89:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-024-00605-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.