IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v53y2016i4d10.1007_s12597-016-0253-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Fritz John saddle point problem for differentiable multiobjective optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Maria C. Maciel

    (Universidad Nacional del Sur)

  • Sandra A. Santos

    (Universidade Estadual de Campinas)

  • Graciela N. Sottosanto

    (Universidad Nacional del Comahue (AR))

Abstract

In this contribution, the relationship between saddle points of Lagrangian functions associated with the inequality constrained multiobjective optimization problem and Fritz John critical points are presented under generalized notions of convexity. Assuming invexity and an extended Slater-type condition upon the multiobjective problem, a regular solution to the Fritz-John system is obtained that encompasses all the objective functions. Also, a new class of generalized convex problems is defined, and its connections with other existing classes are established.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2016. "On the Fritz John saddle point problem for differentiable multiobjective optimization," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 917-933, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:53:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-016-0253-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-016-0253-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-016-0253-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-016-0253-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majid Soleimani-Damaneh, 2015. "Generalized Convexity and Characterization of (Weak) Pareto-Optimality in Nonsmooth Multiobjective Optimization Problems," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 877-899.
    2. J. B. G. Frenk & G. Kassay, 1999. "On Classes of Generalized Convex Functions, Gordan–Farkas Type Theorems, and Lagrangian Duality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 315-343, August.
    3. M. C. Maciel & S. A. Santos & G. N. Sottosanto, 2009. "Regularity Conditions in Differentiable Vector Optimization Revisited," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 385-398, August.
    4. María C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2011. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 332-351, May.
    5. G. Bigi & M. Pappalardo, 1999. "Regularity Conditions in Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 83-96, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2011. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 332-351, May.
    2. Gabriel Haeser & Alberto Ramos, 2020. "Constraint Qualifications for Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Conditions in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 469-487, November.
    3. Elena Constantin, 2020. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Locally Lipschitz Inequality-Constrained Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 50-67, July.
    4. Regina S. Burachik & M. M. Rizvi, 2012. "On Weak and Strong Kuhn–Tucker Conditions for Smooth Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 477-491, November.
    5. Elena Constantin, 2019. "Necessary conditions for weak efficiency for nonsmooth degenerate multiobjective optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 111-129, September.
    6. Min Feng & Shengjie Li, 2018. "An approximate strong KKT condition for multiobjective optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(3), pages 489-509, October.
    7. Elena Constantin, 2021. "Necessary conditions for weak minima and for strict minima of order two in nonsmooth constrained multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 177-193, May.
    8. Radu Boţ & Sorin-Mihai Grad & Gert Wanka, 2007. "A general approach for studying duality in multiobjective optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 65(3), pages 417-444, June.
    9. Fabián Flores-Bazán & William Echegaray & Fernando Flores-Bazán & Eladio Ocaña, 2017. "Primal or dual strong-duality in nonconvex optimization and a class of quasiconvex problems having zero duality gap," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 823-845, December.
    10. Frenk, J.B.G. & Kassay, G., 2005. "Lagrangian duality and cone convexlike functions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-019-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Giorgio, 2019. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Smooth Nonlinear Programming Problems," DEM Working Papers Series 171, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    12. J.M. Martínez & B.F. Svaiter, 2003. "A Practical Optimality Condition Without Constraint Qualifications for Nonlinear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 117-133, July.
    13. María C. Maciel & Sandra A. Santos & Graciela N. Sottosanto, 2021. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization: Addendum," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 597-602, February.
    14. Andrea Cristofari & Marianna Santis & Stefano Lucidi, 2024. "On Necessary Optimality Conditions for Sets of Points in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 126-145, October.
    15. Adan, M. & Novo, V., 2003. "Weak efficiency in vector optimization using a closure of algebraic type under cone-convexlikeness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 641-653, September.
    16. C. Gutiérrez & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2006. "On Approximate Efficiency in Multiobjective Programming," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(1), pages 165-185, August.
    17. M. Adán & V. Novo, 2004. "Proper Efficiency in Vector Optimization on Real Linear Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 515-540, June.
    18. Vsevolod I. Ivanov, 2015. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Vector Problems with Continuously Fréchet Differentiable Data and Second-Order Constraint Qualifications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 777-790, September.
    19. Fabián Flores-Bazán & Fernando Flores-Bazán & Cristián Vera, 2012. "A complete characterization of strong duality in nonconvex optimization with a single constraint," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 185-201, June.
    20. Gutiérrez, C. & Jiménez, B. & Novo, V., 2012. "Improvement sets and vector optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 304-311.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:53:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-016-0253-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.