IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v36y2021i3d10.1007_s00180-021-01084-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of optimization solvers for log binomial regression including conic programming

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Schwendinger

    (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien)

  • Bettina Grün

    (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien)

  • Kurt Hornik

    (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien)

Abstract

Relative risks are estimated to assess associations and effects due to their ease of interpretability, e.g., in epidemiological studies. Fitting log-binomial regression models allows to use the estimated regression coefficients to directly infer the relative risks. The estimation of these models, however, is complicated because of the constraints which have to be imposed on the parameter space. In this paper we systematically compare different optimization algorithms to obtain the maximum likelihood estimates for the regression coefficients in log-binomial regression. We first establish under which conditions the maximum likelihood estimates are guaranteed to be finite and unique, which allows to identify and exclude problematic cases. In simulation studies using artificial data we compare the performance of different optimizers including solvers based on the augmented Lagrangian method, interior-point methods including a conic optimizer, majorize-minimize algorithms, iteratively reweighted least squares and expectation-maximization algorithm variants. We demonstrate that conic optimizers emerge as the preferred choice due to their reliability, lack of requirement to tune hyperparameters and speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Schwendinger & Bettina Grün & Kurt Hornik, 2021. "A comparison of optimization solvers for log binomial regression including conic programming," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1721-1754, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-021-01084-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-021-01084-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-021-01084-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-021-01084-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunter D.R. & Lange K., 2004. "A Tutorial on MM Algorithms," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 58, pages 30-37, February.
    2. H. Kaufmann, 1988. "On existence and uniqueness of maximum likelihood estimates in quantal and ordinal response models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 291-313, December.
    3. Brendan O’Donoghue & Eric Chu & Neal Parikh & Stephen Boyd, 2016. "Conic Optimization via Operator Splitting and Homogeneous Self-Dual Embedding," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1042-1068, June.
    4. Bernardo Borba de Andrade & Joanlise Marco de Leon Andrade, 2018. "Some results for maximum likelihood estimation of adjusted relative risks," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(23), pages 5750-5769, December.
    5. Konis, Kjell & Fokianos, Konstantinos, 2009. "Safe density ratio modeling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(18), pages 1915-1920, September.
    6. Ji Luo & Jiajia Zhang & Han Sun, 2014. "Estimation of relative risk using a log-binomial model with constraints," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 981-1003, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 449-476, March.
    2. Enzo Busseti, 2019. "Derivative of a Conic Problem with a Unique Solution," Papers 1903.05753, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    3. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    4. Leo Liberti, 2020. "Distance geometry and data science," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 271-339, July.
    5. Sakyajit Bhattacharya & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "A LASSO-penalized BIC for mixture model selection," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 45-61, March.
    6. Johannes Friedrich & Pengcheng Zhou & Liam Paninski, 2017. "Fast online deconvolution of calcium imaging data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Andrew Butler & Roy Kwon, 2021. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Papers 2112.07464, arXiv.org.
    8. Utkarsh J. Dang & Michael P.B. Gallaugher & Ryan P. Browne & Paul D. McNicholas, 2023. "Model-Based Clustering and Classification Using Mixtures of Multivariate Skewed Power Exponential Distributions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(1), pages 145-167, April.
    9. V. Maume-Deschamps & D. Rullière & A. Usseglio-Carleve, 2018. "Spatial Expectile Predictions for Elliptical Random Fields," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 643-671, June.
    10. Jianming Pan & Zeqi Ye & Xiao Yang & Xu Yang & Weiqing Liu & Lewen Wang & Jiang Bian, 2024. "BPQP: A Differentiable Convex Optimization Framework for Efficient End-to-End Learning," Papers 2411.19285, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    11. Sanjeena Subedi & Drew Neish & Stephen Bak & Zeny Feng, 2020. "Cluster analysis of microbiome data by using mixtures of Dirichlet–multinomial regression models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1163-1187, November.
    12. Lian, Heng & Meng, Jie & Fan, Zengyan, 2015. "Simultaneous estimation of linear conditional quantiles with penalized splines," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-21.
    13. Tian, Guo-Liang & Tang, Man-Lai & Liu, Chunling, 2012. "Accelerating the quadratic lower-bound algorithm via optimizing the shrinkage parameter," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 255-265.
    14. Sun, Qinghe & Chen, Li & Meng, Qiang, 2022. "Evaluating port efficiency dynamics: A risk-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 333-347.
    15. Chen, Ying & Koch, Thorsten & Zakiyeva, Nazgul & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2020. "Modeling and forecasting the dynamics of the natural gas transmission network in Germany with the demand and supply balance constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    16. Vu, Duy & Aitkin, Murray, 2015. "Variational algorithms for biclustering models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-24.
    17. Gunter Maris & Han Maas, 2012. "Speed-Accuracy Response Models: Scoring Rules based on Response Time and Accuracy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 615-633, October.
    18. Run Chen & Andrew L. Liu, 2021. "A distributed algorithm for high-dimension convex quadratically constrained quadratic programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 781-830, December.
    19. Yen, Tso-Jung & Yen, Yu-Min, 2016. "Structured variable selection via prior-induced hierarchical penalty functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 87-103.
    20. Ouindllassida Jean-Etienne Ou´edraogo & Edoh Katchekpele & Simplice Dossou-Gb´et´e, 2021. "Marginalized Maximum Likelihood for Parameters Estimation of the Three Parameter Weibull Distribution," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 1-62, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-021-01084-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.