IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v10y2004i2d10.1023_bcmot.0000039170.91349.c2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiplex Multi-Core Pattern of Network Organizations: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Youmin Xi

    (Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an)

  • Fangcheng Tang

    (Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an)

Abstract

Recent research on small-world theory has been expanded upon organizations behavior. However, most individual studies have taken a simplified view of individuals and relationships among members by focusing on a single type of links mainly within dyadic relationships. In reality, members of organizations are interacting with each other and often connected via many types of links within more complex relationships. To explore this complex interaction, this study models organization as network and proposes a multiplex approach that captures the complexity of relationships among members in organizations. This approach accounts for the multiple types of links among members and the multiple roles of members within network organizations. It is illustrated via a case study of a network organization. The case study demonstrates how this approach could capture the many types of relationship among members as well as the various roles that members play within the network organization. Such an approach can yield new insights on how to better manage network organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Youmin Xi & Fangcheng Tang, 2004. "Multiplex Multi-Core Pattern of Network Organizations: An Exploratory Study," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-195, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:10:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1023_b:cmot.0000039170.91349.c2
    DOI: 10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039170.91349.c2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039170.91349.c2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039170.91349.c2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Haythornthwaite & Barry Wellman, 1998. "Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(12), pages 1101-1114.
    2. Jeffrey Barker & Dean Tjosvold & I. Robert Andrews, 1988. "Conflict Approaches Of Effective And Ineffective Project Managers: A Field Study In A Matrix Organization[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 167-178, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng-Xiang Li & Meng-Wu Zhang & You-Min Xi & Wen-Tian Cui, 2009. "Why organizational networks in reality do not show scale-free distributions," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 169-190, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Paul Resnick & Eytan Adar & Cliff Lampe, 2015. "What Social Media Data We Are Missing and How to Get It," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 192-206, May.
    3. Ellegaard, Chris & Andersen, Poul Houman, 2015. "The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 457-470.
    4. Wolf, Joachim & Egelhoff, William G., 2013. "An empirical evaluation of conflict in MNC matrix structure firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 591-601.
    5. Daniel A. Levinthal & Maciej Workiewicz, 2018. "When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 207-224, April.
    6. Silke Retzer & Pak Yoong & Val Hooper, 2012. "Inter-organisational knowledge transfer in social networks: A definition of intermediate ties," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 343-361, April.
    7. Sarah Morrison & Samuel Sundong, 2014. "Causes of Conflict in Organizations: A Case of Takoradi Polytechnic," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 125-137.
    8. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 2020. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1357-1376, December.
    9. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 0. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    10. Ahmed, Zafor, 2018. "Explaining the unpredictability: A social capital perspective on ICT intervention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 175-186.
    11. Carol X. J. Ou & Robert M. Davison, 2016. "Shaping guanxi networks at work through instant messaging," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1153-1168, May.
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:03b31 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Franz Huber, 2012. "On the Sociospatial Dynamics of Personal Knowledge Networks: Formation, Maintenance, and Knowledge Interactions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(2), pages 356-376, February.
    14. Krzysztof Gos, 2015. "The Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Matrix Organizational Structures (Kluczowe zalety i ograniczenia macierzowych struktur organizacyjnych)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(19), pages 66-83.
    15. Matošková Jana & Směšná Petra, 2017. "Human resource management practices stimulating knowledge sharing," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 614-632, December.
    16. Evren Ayranci, 2019. "Effects of Shared Leadership Perception on Perceived Intragroup Conflict: An Investigation in Technology Startups in Turkey," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 126-143, October.
    17. Maxim Sytch & Franz Wohlgezogen & Edward J. Zajac, 2018. "Collaborative by Design? How Matrix Organizations See/Do Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1130-1148, December.
    18. Bosch-Sijtsema, Petra M. & Rispens, Sonja, 2003. "Facilitating knowledge transfer in virtual teams through a social network approach," Research Report 03B31, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    19. Paul M. Leonardi, 2007. "Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 813-831, October.
    20. Alaina G. Kanfer & Caroline Haythornthwaite & Bertram C. Bruce & Geoffrey C. Bowker & Nicholas C. Burbules & Joseph F. Porac & James Wade, 2000. "Modeling Distributed Knowledge Processes in Next Generation Multidisciplinary Alliances," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 317-331, October.
    21. George Cristian Nistor, 2019. "An Extended Technology Acceptance Model For Marketing Strategies In Social Media," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 23, pages 127-136, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:10:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1023_b:cmot.0000039170.91349.c2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.