IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v2y2000i3d10.1023_a1026520728644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Distributed Knowledge Processes in Next Generation Multidisciplinary Alliances

Author

Listed:
  • Alaina G. Kanfer

    (National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), BORN)

  • Caroline Haythornthwaite

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC))

  • Bertram C. Bruce

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC))

  • Geoffrey C. Bowker

    (University of California)

  • Nicholas C. Burbules

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC))

  • Joseph F. Porac

    (Emory University)

  • James Wade

    (University of Wisconsin)

Abstract

Current research on distributed knowledge processes suggests a critical conflict between knowledge processes in groups and the technologies built to support them. The conflict centers on observations that authentic and efficient knowledge creation and sharing is deeply embedded in an interpersonal face to face context, but that technologies to support distributed knowledge processes rely on the assumption that knowledge can be made mobile outside these specific contexts. This conflict is of growing national importance as work patterns change from same site to separate site collaboration, and millions of government and industrial dollars are invested in establishing academic-industry alliances and building infrastructures to support distributed collaboration and knowledge. In this paper we describe our multi-method approach for studying the tension between embedded and mobile knowledge in a project funded by the National Science Foundation's program on Knowledge and Distributed Intelligence. This project examines knowledge processes and technology in distributed, multidisciplinary scientific teams in the National Computational Science Alliance (Alliance), a prototypical next generation enterprise. First we review evidence for the tension between embedded and mobile knowledge in several research literatures. Then we present our three-factor conceptualization that considers how the interrelationships among characteristics of the knowledge shared, group context, and communications technology contribute to the tension between embedded and mobile knowledge. Based on this conceptualization we suggest that this dichotomy does not fully explain distributed multidisciplinary knowledge processes. Therefore we propose some alternate models of how knowledge is shared. We briefly introduce the setting in which we are studying distributed knowledge processes and finally, we describe the data collection methods and the current status of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaina G. Kanfer & Caroline Haythornthwaite & Bertram C. Bruce & Geoffrey C. Bowker & Nicholas C. Burbules & Joseph F. Porac & James Wade, 2000. "Modeling Distributed Knowledge Processes in Next Generation Multidisciplinary Alliances," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 317-331, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:2:y:2000:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1026520728644
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1026520728644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1026520728644
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1026520728644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Haythornthwaite & Barry Wellman, 1998. "Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(12), pages 1101-1114.
    2. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1996. "What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(5), pages 502-518, October.
    3. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine L. Borgman, 2012. "The conundrum of sharing research data," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1059-1078, June.
    2. Wenan Tan & Senbo Chen & Jingxian Li & Lingxia Li & Tong Wang & Xiaoming Hu, 2014. "A Trust Evaluation Model for E‐Learning Systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 353-365, May.
    3. Riccardo Cognini & Flavio Corradini & Stefania Gnesi & Andrea Polini & Barbara Re, 0. "Business process flexibility - a systematic literature review with a software systems perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-29.
    4. Riccardo Cognini & Flavio Corradini & Stefania Gnesi & Andrea Polini & Barbara Re, 2018. "Business process flexibility - a systematic literature review with a software systems perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 343-371, April.
    5. Costantino Thanos, 2017. "Research Data Reusability: Conceptual Foundations, Barriers and Enabling Technologies," Publications, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Bouwman, Christa H.S., 2014. "Managerial optimism and earnings smoothing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 283-303.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rogerio S. Victer, 2020. "Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Kannan Srikanth & Phanish Puranam, 2014. "The Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Software Services Offshoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1253-1271, August.
    3. Chris Kimble, 2013. "Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00826911, HAL.
    4. Bruce Heiman & Jack Nickerson, 2002. "Towards Reconciling Transaction Cost Economics and the Knowledge-based View of the Firm: The Context of Interfirm Collaborations," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 97-116.
    5. Varghese P. George, 2013. "A Communication-Focused Model For Learning And Education," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 117-130.
    6. Carol X. J. Ou & Robert M. Davison, 2016. "Shaping guanxi networks at work through instant messaging," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1153-1168, May.
    7. Corvello, Vincenzo & Migliarese, Piero, 2007. "Virtual forms for the organization of production: A comparative analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 5-15, October.
    8. A. Willem & M. Buelens, 2006. "Effects of Organizational Design Dimensions on Inter-unit Knowledge Sharing," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/384, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Özgecan Koçak & Phanish Puranam, 2022. "Separated by a Common Language: How the Nature of Code Differences Shapes Communication Success and Code Convergence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5287-5310, July.
    10. Jody Hoffer Gittell, 2002. "Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(11), pages 1408-1426, November.
    11. Andrew King, 1999. "Retrieving and Transferring Embodied Data: Implications for the Management of Interdependence Within Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 918-935, July.
    12. Law, Kuok Kei, 2014. "The problem with knowledge ambiguity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 444-450.
    13. Liao, Chechen & Chuang, Shu-Hui & To, Pui-Lai, 2011. "How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 728-736, July.
    14. Berends, J.J. & Bij van der, J.D. & Debackere, K. & Weggeman, M.P.C.D., 2004. "Knowledge sharing mechanisms in industrial research," Working Papers 04.04, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    15. McCann, Brian T. & Folta, Timothy B., 2011. "Performance differentials within geographic clusters," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 104-123, January.
    16. Todd Zenger, 2002. "Crafting Internal Hybrids: Complementarities, Common Change Initiatives, and the Team-Based Organization," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 79-95.
    17. Xu, Xiao-Yu & Jia, Qing-Dan & Tayyab, Syed Muhammad Usman, 2024. "Exploring the stimulating role of augmented reality features in E-commerce: A three-staged hybrid approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    19. Windsperger, Josef, 2001. "The fee structure in franchising: a property rights view," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 219-226, November.
    20. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:2:y:2000:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1026520728644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.