IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arjevr/v5y2014i3p125-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causes of Conflict in Organizations: A Case of Takoradi Polytechnic

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Morrison
  • Samuel Sundong

Abstract

The study explored the various causes of conflicts in organizations. The objectives of the study was to find out the nature, types and factors that lead to staff related conflicts in organizations especially tertiary educational institutions. To achieve the objectives, researchers employed the case study approach using Takoradi Polytechnic as the case study. It also involved the use of interview and questionnaire as the data collection instruments for the study. Researchers used the purposive and simple random sampling techniques to select the respondents. A sample size of 276 out of 736 of the population was selected for the study. This constitutes (36%) of the population. The sample was made up of 109 junior staff, 96 senior staff and 71 senior members. These three groups of staff from different departments were randomly and purposively invited to participate in the study. The study would be of immense benefit to management of institutions especially educational institutions since it would inform them of possible conflict that could arise. It would also inform policy formulation and staff training and development programs. It was discovered after the study that there were various conflicts in the organization which could be grouped into intra-personal, interpersonal and inter-group conflicts. These were as a result of the competing for limited resources, power struggle, differences in behavior among others. It recommends the education of staff through workshops and seminars on the differences that leads to conflicts, provision of resources and infrastructure that could mitigate the competition of resources among others.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Morrison & Samuel Sundong, 2014. "Causes of Conflict in Organizations: A Case of Takoradi Polytechnic," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 125-137.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arjevr:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:125-137
    DOI: 10.22610/jevr.v5i3.161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jevr/article/view/161/161
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jevr/article/view/161
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/jevr.v5i3.161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Barker & Dean Tjosvold & I. Robert Andrews, 1988. "Conflict Approaches Of Effective And Ineffective Project Managers: A Field Study In A Matrix Organization[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 167-178, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellegaard, Chris & Andersen, Poul Houman, 2015. "The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 457-470.
    2. Wolf, Joachim & Egelhoff, William G., 2013. "An empirical evaluation of conflict in MNC matrix structure firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 591-601.
    3. Youmin Xi & Fangcheng Tang, 2004. "Multiplex Multi-Core Pattern of Network Organizations: An Exploratory Study," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-195, July.
    4. Daniel A. Levinthal & Maciej Workiewicz, 2018. "When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 207-224, April.
    5. Krzysztof Gos, 2015. "The Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Matrix Organizational Structures (Kluczowe zalety i ograniczenia macierzowych struktur organizacyjnych)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(19), pages 66-83.
    6. Evren Ayranci, 2019. "Effects of Shared Leadership Perception on Perceived Intragroup Conflict: An Investigation in Technology Startups in Turkey," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 126-143, October.
    7. Maxim Sytch & Franz Wohlgezogen & Edward J. Zajac, 2018. "Collaborative by Design? How Matrix Organizations See/Do Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1130-1148, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arjevr:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:125-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jevr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.