IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v21y2013i2p415-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference of the stochastic MAPK pathway by modified diffusion bridge method

Author

Listed:
  • Vilda Purutçuoğlu

Abstract

The MAPK pathway is one of the well-known systems in oncogene researches of eukaryotes due to its important role in cell life. In this study, we perform the parameter estimation of a realistic MAPK system by using western blotting data. In inference, we use the modified diffusion bridge algorithm with data augmentation technique by modelling the realistically complex system via the Euler–Maruyama approximation. This approximation, which is the discretized version of the diffusion model, can be seen as an alternative OR approach with respect to the (hidden) Markov chain method in stochastic modelling of the biochemical systems where the data can be fully or partially observed and the time-course measurements are though to be collected at small time steps. Hereby, the modified diffusion bridge technique, which is based on the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, enables us to accurately estimate the model parameters, presented as the stochastic reaction rate constants, of the diffusion model under high dimensional systems despite loss in computational demand. In the estimation of the parameters, due to the complexity in the decision-making problems of the MCMC updates at different stages, we face with the dependency challenges. We unravel them by checking the singularity of the system in every stage of updates. In modelling, we also assume with/without-measurement error approaches in all states. But in order to evaluate the performance of both models, we initially implement them in a toy system. From the results, we observe that the model with measurement error performs better than the model without measurement error in terms of the mixing features of the MCMC runs and the accuracy of estimates, thereby, it is used for the parameter estimation of the realistic MAPK pathway. From the outcomes, we consider that the suggested approach can be seen as a promising alternative method in inference of parameters via different OR techniques in system biology. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Vilda Purutçuoğlu, 2013. "Inference of the stochastic MAPK pathway by modified diffusion bridge method," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(2), pages 415-429, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:21:y:2013:i:2:p:415-429
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-012-0237-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10100-012-0237-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-012-0237-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golightly, A. & Wilkinson, D.J., 2008. "Bayesian inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusion models observed with error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1674-1693, January.
    2. Schäfer Juliane & Strimmer Korbinian, 2005. "A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Chib, Siddhartha & Nardari, Federico & Shephard, Neil, 2006. "Analysis of high dimensional multivariate stochastic volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 341-371, October.
    4. A. Golightly & D. J. Wilkinson, 2005. "Bayesian Inference for Stochastic Kinetic Models Using a Diffusion Approximation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 781-788, September.
    5. Eraker, Bjorn, 2001. "MCMC Analysis of Diffusion Models with Application to Finance," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 19(2), pages 177-191, April.
    6. Kam Yeung & Thomas Seitz & Shengfeng Li & Petra Janosch & Brian McFerran & Christian Kaiser & Frances Fee & Kostas D. Katsanakis & David W. Rose & Harald Mischak & John M. Sedivy & Walter Kolch, 1999. "Suppression of Raf-1 kinase activity and MAP kinase signalling by RKIP," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6749), pages 173-177, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin S. Gillespie & Andrew Golightly, 2010. "Bayesian inference for generalized stochastic population growth models with application to aphids," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(2), pages 341-357, March.
    2. Libo Sun & Chihoon Lee & Jennifer A. Hoeting, 2019. "A penalized simulated maximum likelihood method to estimate parameters for SDEs with measurement error," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 847-863, June.
    3. Mogens Bladt & Samuel Finch & Michael Sørensen, 2016. "Simulation of multivariate diffusion bridges," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 343-369, March.
    4. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2023. "Bayesian Forecasting in the 21st Century: A Modern Review," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/23, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Aliu, A. Hassan & Abiodun A. A. & Ipinyomi R.A., 2017. "Statistical Inference for Discretely Observed Diffusion Epidemic Models," International Journal of Mathematics Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 29-35.
    6. Golightly, A. & Wilkinson, D.J., 2008. "Bayesian inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusion models observed with error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1674-1693, January.
    7. Isambi Mbalawata & Simo Särkkä & Heikki Haario, 2013. "Parameter estimation in stochastic differential equations with Markov chain Monte Carlo and non-linear Kalman filtering," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1195-1223, June.
    8. Quentin Clairon & Adeline Samson, 2020. "Optimal control for estimation in partially observed elliptic and hypoelliptic linear stochastic differential equations," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 105-127, April.
    9. Yuan Shen & Dan Cornford & Manfred Opper & Cedric Archambeau, 2012. "Variational Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian smoothing of non-linear diffusions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 149-176, March.
    10. Giorgos Sermaidis & Omiros Papaspiliopoulos & Gareth O. Roberts & Alexandros Beskos & Paul Fearnhead, 2013. "Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Exact Inference for Diffusions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(2), pages 294-321, June.
    11. Paul Fearnhead & Vasilieos Giagos & Chris Sherlock, 2014. "Inference for reaction networks using the linear noise approximation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 457-466, June.
    12. Martin, Gael M. & Frazier, David T. & Maneesoonthorn, Worapree & Loaiza-Maya, Rubén & Huber, Florian & Koop, Gary & Maheu, John & Nibbering, Didier & Panagiotelis, Anastasios, 2024. "Bayesian forecasting in economics and finance: A modern review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 811-839.
    13. Chiarella, Carl & Hung, Hing & T, Thuy-Duong, 2009. "The volatility structure of the fixed income market under the HJM framework: A nonlinear filtering approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 2075-2088, April.
    14. Sun, Libo & Lee, Chihoon & Hoeting, Jennifer A., 2015. "A penalized simulated maximum likelihood approach in parameter estimation for stochastic differential equations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 54-67.
    15. Theodore Simos & Mike Tsionas, 2018. "Bayesian inference of the fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process under a flow sampling scheme," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1687-1713, December.
    16. S. C. Kou & Benjamin P. Olding & Martin Lysy & Jun S. Liu, 2012. "A Multiresolution Method for Parameter Estimation of Diffusion Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(500), pages 1558-1574, December.
    17. Hannart, Alexis & Naveau, Philippe, 2014. "Estimating high dimensional covariance matrices: A new look at the Gaussian conjugate framework," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-162.
    18. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard & Robert F. Engle, 2021. "Fitting Vast Dimensional Time-Varying Covariance Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 652-668, July.
    19. Gruber, Lutz F. & West, Mike, 2017. "Bayesian online variable selection and scalable multivariate volatility forecasting in simultaneous graphical dynamic linear models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 3-22.
    20. Avagyan, Vahe & Nogales, Francisco J., 2015. "D-trace Precision Matrix Estimation Using Adaptive Lasso Penalties," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 21775, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:21:y:2013:i:2:p:415-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.