IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v61y2019i6d10.1007_s12599-018-0539-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closing the Gap Between Experts and Novices Using Analytics-as-a-Service: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmien Lismont

    (KU Leuven)

  • Tine Van Calster

    (KU Leuven)

  • María Óskarsdóttir

    (KU Leuven)

  • Seppe vanden Broucke

    (KU Leuven)

  • Bart Baesens

    (KU Leuven
    University of Southampton)

  • Wilfried Lemahieu

    (KU Leuven)

  • Jan Vanthienen

    (KU Leuven)

Abstract

Generating insights and value from data has become an important asset for organizations. At the same time, the need for experts in analytics is increasing and the number of analytics applications is growing. Recently, a new trend has emerged, i.e. analytics-as-a-service platforms, that makes it easier to apply analytics both for novice and expert users. In this study, the authors approach these new services by conducting a full-factorial experiment where both inexperienced and experienced users take on an analytics task with an analytics-as-a-service technology. The research proves that although experts in analytics still significantly outperform novices, these web-based platforms do offer an advantage to inexperienced users. Furthermore, the authors find that analytics-as-a-service does not offer the same benefits across different analytics tasks. That is, they observe better performance for supervised analytics tasks. Moreover, this study indicates that there are significant differences between novices. The most important distinction lies in the approach they take on the task. Novices who follow a more complex, although structured, workflow behave more similarly to experts and, thus, also perform better. The findings can aid managers in their hiring and training strategy with regards to both business users and data scientists. Moreover, it can guide managers in the development of an enterprise-wide analytics culture. Finally, the results can inform vendors about the design and development of these platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmien Lismont & Tine Van Calster & María Óskarsdóttir & Seppe vanden Broucke & Bart Baesens & Wilfried Lemahieu & Jan Vanthienen, 2019. "Closing the Gap Between Experts and Novices Using Analytics-as-a-Service: An Experimental Study," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 679-693, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:61:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s12599-018-0539-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-018-0539-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-018-0539-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-018-0539-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Alpar & Michael Schulz, 2016. "Self-Service Business Intelligence," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(2), pages 151-155, April.
    2. Christof Weinhardt & Arun Anandasivam & Benjamin Blau & Nikolay Borissov & Thomas Meinl & Wibke Michalk & Jochen Stößer, 2009. "Cloud Computing – A Classification, Business Models, and Research Directions," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(5), pages 391-399, October.
    3. Stefan Debortoli & Oliver Müller & Jan Brocke, 2014. "Comparing Business Intelligence and Big Data Skills," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(5), pages 289-300, October.
    4. Lismont, Jasmien & Vanthienen, Jan & Baesens, Bart & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2017. "Defining analytics maturity indicators: A survey approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 114-124.
    5. Montero, Pablo & Vilar, José A., 2014. "TSclust: An R Package for Time Series Clustering," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 62(i01).
    6. Pei-yu Chen & Shin-yi Wu, 2013. "The Impact and Implications of On-Demand Services on Market Structure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 750-767, September.
    7. Terrence August & Marius Florin Niculescu & Hyoduk Shin, 2014. "Cloud Implications on Software Network Structure and Security Risks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 489-510, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabian Hunke & Daniel Heinz & Gerhard Satzger, 2022. "Creating customer value from data: foundations and archetypes of analytics-based services," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 503-521, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Li-Ming & Chang, Wei-Lun, 2020. "Under what conditions can an application service firm with in-house computing benefit from cloudbursting?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 71-80.
    2. Bo Li & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Managing Software‐as‐a‐Service: Pricing and operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2588-2608, June.
    3. Rajib L. Saha & Sumanta Singha & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Does Congestion Always Hurt? Managing Discount Under Congestion in a Game-Theoretic Setting," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1347-1367, December.
    4. Mehdi Nezami & Kapil R. Tuli & Shantanu Dutta, 2022. "Shareholder wealth implications of software firms’ transition to cloud computing: a marketing perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 538-562, May.
    5. Zan Zhang & Guofang Nan & Yong Tan, 2020. "Cloud Services vs. On-Premises Software: Competition Under Security Risk and Product Customization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 848-864, September.
    6. Mingwen Yang & Varghese S. Jacob & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2021. "Cloud Service Model’s Role in Provider and User Security Investment Incentives," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 419-437, February.
    7. Stine Labes & Nicolai Hanner & Ruediger Zarnekow, 2017. "Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 223-233, August.
    8. Debabrata Dey & Atanu Lahiri & Guoying Zhang, 2015. "Optimal Policies for Security Patch Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 462-477, August.
    9. Kjell Hausken, 2017. "Security Investment, Hacking, and Information Sharing between Firms and between Hackers," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Ron Berman & Ayelet Israeli, 2022. "The Value of Descriptive Analytics: Evidence from Online Retailers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1074-1096, November.
    11. Beibei Zhang & Rong Chen, 2018. "Nonlinear Time Series Clustering Based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2D Statistic," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 35(3), pages 394-421, October.
    12. Stinshoff, Volker, 2020. "Selbst gemacht ist gut gemacht? Der Einfluss von Self-Service Reporting auf die Qualität von Managemententscheidungen," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 5(2), pages 223-245.
    13. Hanjo Odendaal & Monique Reid & Johann F. Kirsten, 2020. "Media‐Based Sentiment Indices as an Alternative Measure of Consumer Confidence," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 88(4), pages 409-434, December.
    14. Yonghua Ji & Subodha Kumar & Vijay Mookerjee, 2016. "When Being Hot Is Not Cool: Monitoring Hot Lists for Information Security," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 897-918, December.
    15. Stephen L. France & Yuying Shi, 2017. "Aggregating Google Trends: Multivariate Testing and Analysis," Papers 1712.03152, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    16. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    17. Sokhna Dieng & Pierre Michel & Abdoulaye Guindo & Kankoe Sallah & El-Hadj Ba & Badara Cissé & Maria Patrizia Carrieri & Cheikh Sokhna & Paul Milligan & Jean Gaudart, 2020. "Application of Functional Data Analysis to Identify Patterns of Malaria Incidence, to Guide Targeted Control Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Tursunbayeva, Aizhan & Di Lauro, Stefano & Pagliari, Claudia, 2018. "People analytics—A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 224-247.
    19. Liu, Sen & Chan, Felix T.S. & Yang, Junai & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Understanding the effect of cloud computing on organizational agility: An empirical examination," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 98-111.
    20. Xueming Luo & Michelle Andrews & Zheng Fang & Chee Wei Phang, 2014. "Mobile Targeting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1738-1756, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:61:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s12599-018-0539-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.