IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v24y2013i3p750-767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact and Implications of On-Demand Services on Market Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Pei-yu Chen

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Shin-yi Wu

    (Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management (MSCM), Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

Abstract

This paper considers on-demand services and its impact on market structure, firm profitability, and consumer welfare. The unique properties of on-demand services are the conversion of fixed costs to variable costs, removal of capacity constraint, and fast setup time (which enables quick entry by any firm at any time when there is opportunity), whereas privacy and security concerns and switching costs have been noted as the biggest barriers from adopting on-demand services. With a stylized model capturing these benefits and barriers to using on-demand services, we establish several results. First, we show that conversion of fixed cost to variable cost enables new and small firms to enter existing markets and leads to the creation of new markets. Second, we show that competition and the threat of new entrants can be an important driver of a firm's decision to switch to on-demand services. In addition, a firm's barriers to using on-demand services can influence another firm's entry decision. Third, we show that two identical firms may employ different technologies in equilibrium. Fourth, we show that fast setup time and removal of capacity constraint associated with on-demand services make it impossible for firms to make supranormal return and would lead to a perfect competitive market, even when there is only one firm, under very general conditions. Such a result still holds even when there exists an economy of scale (e.g., quantity discount) from using on-demand services. On the other hand, when there are barriers preventing firms from offering similar products and products are substantially differentiated, on-demand services can amplify this advantage of entry barriers by enabling firms to further increase prices and enhance their profitability. Therefore, contrary to the common belief that offering on-demand services is best for firms offering commodity products, we show on-demand services to be more profitable for firms with differentiated products.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei-yu Chen & Shin-yi Wu, 2013. "The Impact and Implications of On-Demand Services on Market Structure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 750-767, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:750-767
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.1120.0451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0451
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.1120.0451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knox, George & Eliashberg, Jehoshua, 2009. "The consumer's rent vs. buy decision in the rentailer," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 125-135.
    2. Anandasivam Gopal & Konduru Sivaramakrishnan & M. S. Krishnan & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 2003. "Contracts in Offshore Software Development: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(12), pages 1671-1683, December.
    3. M. S. Krishnan & Venkatram Ramaswamy & Mary C. Meyer & Paul Damien, 1999. "Customer Satisfaction for Financial Services: The Role of Products, Services, and Information Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(9), pages 1194-1209, September.
    4. Uday M. Apte & Richard O. Mason, 1995. "Global Disaggregation of Information-Intensive Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(7), pages 1250-1262, July.
    5. repec:bla:jindec:v:48:y:2000:i:4:p:473-88 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hal R. Varian, 2000. "Buying, Sharing and Renting Information Goods," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 473-488, December.
    7. Soon Ang & Larry L. Cummings, 1997. "Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 235-256, June.
    8. Shy, Oz & Stenbacka, Rune, 2003. "Strategic outsourcing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 203-224, February.
    9. Seungjin Whang, 1992. "Contracting for Software Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 307-324, March.
    10. Lawrence Loh & N. Venkatraman, 1992. "Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 334-358, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehdi Nezami & Kapil R. Tuli & Shantanu Dutta, 2022. "Shareholder wealth implications of software firms’ transition to cloud computing: a marketing perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 538-562, May.
    2. Bo Li & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Managing Software‐as‐a‐Service: Pricing and operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2588-2608, June.
    3. Jasmien Lismont & Tine Van Calster & María Óskarsdóttir & Seppe vanden Broucke & Bart Baesens & Wilfried Lemahieu & Jan Vanthienen, 2019. "Closing the Gap Between Experts and Novices Using Analytics-as-a-Service: An Experimental Study," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 679-693, December.
    4. Rajib L. Saha & Sumanta Singha & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Does Congestion Always Hurt? Managing Discount Under Congestion in a Game-Theoretic Setting," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1347-1367, December.
    5. David Agogo, 2021. "Invisible market for online personal data: An examination," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 989-1010, December.
    6. Li, Bo & Tan, Zhen & Arreola-Risa, Antonio & Huang, Yiwei, 2023. "On the improvement of uncertain cloud service capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Zan Zhang & Guofang Nan & Yong Tan, 2020. "Cloud Services vs. On-Premises Software: Competition Under Security Risk and Product Customization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 848-864, September.
    8. Liu, Sen & Chan, Felix T.S. & Yang, Junai & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Understanding the effect of cloud computing on organizational agility: An empirical examination," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 98-111.
    9. Xueming Luo & Michelle Andrews & Zheng Fang & Chee Wei Phang, 2014. "Mobile Targeting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1738-1756, July.
    10. Shuai Ding & Chen-Yi Xia & Kai-Le Zhou & Shan-Lin Yang & Jennifer S Shang, 2014. "Decision Support for Personalized Cloud Service Selection through Multi-Attribute Trustworthiness Evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Chen, Li-Ming & Chang, Wei-Lun, 2020. "Under what conditions can an application service firm with in-house computing benefit from cloudbursting?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 71-80.
    12. Murtaza Haider & Randall Shannon & George P. Moschis, 2022. "Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, March.
    13. Amir Fazli & Amin Sayedi & Jeffrey D. Shulman, 2018. "The Effects of Autoscaling in Cloud Computing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5149-5163, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    2. Marfri Gambal & Aleksandre Asatiani & Julia Kotlarsky, 2022. "Strategic Innovation Through Outsourcing: A Theoretical Review," Papers 2206.00982, arXiv.org.
    3. Anitesh Barua & Deepa Mani, 2018. "Reexamining the Market Value of Information Technology Events," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 225-240, March.
    4. Baozhou Lu & Rudy Hirschheim & Andrew Schwarz, 2015. "Examining the antecedent factors of online microsourcing," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 601-617, June.
    5. Anjana Susarla & Ramanath Subramanyam & Prasanna Karhade, 2010. "Contractual Provisions to Mitigate Holdup: Evidence from Information Technology Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-55, March.
    6. Mashiho Mihalache & Oli R. Mihalache, 2020. "What is Offshoring Management Capability and How Do Organizations Develop It? A Study of Dutch IT Service Providers," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 37-67, February.
    7. Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Zuoming Liu, 2019. "Aligning governance mechanisms with task features to improve service capabilities---an empirical study of professional service outsourcing in India," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 19-39, June.
    8. Jérôme Barthélemy & Bertrand Quélin, 2002. "Competence, Specificity and Outsourcing : Impact on the complexity of the contract," Working Papers hal-00593655, HAL.
    9. Joseph W. Rottman & Mary C. Lacity, 2008. "A US Client’s learning from outsourcing IT work offshore," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 259-275, April.
    10. Kshetri, Nir, 2007. "Institutional factors affecting offshore business process and information technology outsourcing," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 38-56, March.
    11. Jérôme Barthélemy & Dominique Geyer, 2005. "An empirical investigation of IT outsourcing vs. quasi-outsourcing in France and Germany," Post-Print hal-00764228, HAL.
    12. David Fitoussi & Vijay Gurbaxani, 2012. "IT Outsourcing Contracts and Performance Measurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 129-143, March.
    13. Debabrata Dey & Ming Fan & Conglei Zhang, 2010. "Design and Analysis of Contracts for Software Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 93-114, March.
    14. Kartik Kalaignanam & Tarun Kushwaha & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Kapil R. Tuli, 2013. "The Effect of CRM Outsourcing on Shareholder Value: A Contingency Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 748-769, July.
    15. Yuanyuan Chen & Anandhi Bharadwaj, 2009. "An Empirical Analysis of Contract Structures in IT Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 484-506, December.
    16. Anita Rao, 2015. "Online Content Pricing: Purchase and Rental Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 430-451, May.
    17. Yutian Chen, 2010. "Strategic Outsourcing between Rivals," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 11(2), pages 301-311, November.
    18. Julie Holland Mortimer, 2007. "Price Discrimination, Copyright Law, and Technological Innovation: Evidence from the Introduction of DVDs," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(3), pages 1307-1350.
    19. Dermot Leahy & Catia Montagna, 2006. "'Make-or-Buy' in International Oligopoly and the Role of Competitive Pressure," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 197, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
    20. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:750-767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.