IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v309y2022i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04445-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computing the execution probability of jobs with replication in mixed-criticality schedules

Author

Listed:
  • Antonin Novak

    (Czech Technical University in Prague
    Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague)

  • Zdenek Hanzalek

    (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Abstract

Mixed-criticality scheduling addresses the problem of sharing common resources among jobs of different degrees of criticality and uncertain processing times. The processing time of jobs is observed during the online execution of the schedule with the prolongations of critical jobs being compensated by the rejection of less critical ones. One of the central questions in the field of mixed-criticality scheduling is ensuring the high reliability of the system with as few resources as possible. In this paper, we study the computation of the execution probability of jobs with uncertain processing times in a static mixed-criticality schedule. The aim is to compute the execution probability of jobs (i.e., the objective function of a schedule), which is a problem solvable by a closed-form formula when the jobs are not replicated. We introduce the job replication, i.e., scheduling a single job multiple times, as a new mechanism for increasing the execution probability of jobs. We show that the general problem with job replication becomes $$\#{\mathcal {P}}$$ # P -hard, which is proven by the reduction from the counting variant of 3-sat problem. To compute the execution probability, we propose an algorithm utilizing the framework of Bayesian networks. Furthermore, we show that cases of practical interest admit a polynomial-time algorithm and are efficiently solvable. The proposed methodology demonstrates an interesting connection between schedules with uncertain execution and probabilistic graphical models and opens a new approach to the analysis of mixed-criticality schedules.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonin Novak & Zdenek Hanzalek, 2022. "Computing the execution probability of jobs with replication in mixed-criticality schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 209-232, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:309:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04445-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04445-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04445-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04445-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Racha El-Hajj & Rym Nesrine Guibadj & Aziz Moukrim & Mehdi Serairi, 2020. "A PSO based algorithm with an efficient optimal split procedure for the multiperiod vehicle routing problem with profit," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 281-316, August.
    2. Zdeněk Hanzálek & Přemysl Šůcha, 2017. "Time symmetry of resource constrained project scheduling with general temporal constraints and take-give resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 209-237, January.
    3. Paredes, R. & Dueñas-Osorio, L. & Meel, K.S. & Vardi, M.Y., 2019. "Principled network reliability approximation: A counting-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Chang, Zhiqi & Ding, Jian-Ya & Song, Shiji, 2019. "Distributionally robust scheduling on parallel machines under moment uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 832-846.
    5. Fernando Jaramillo & Busra Keles & Murat Erkoc, 2020. "Modeling single machine preemptive scheduling problems for computational efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 197-222, February.
    6. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    7. Cheng-Ta Yeh, 2020. "Binary-state line assignment optimization to maximize the reliability of an information network under time and budget constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 439-463, April.
    8. Seddik, Yasmina & Hanzálek, Zdenek, 2017. "Match-up scheduling of mixed-criticality jobs: Maximizing the probability of jobs execution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 46-59.
    9. José A. Santiváñez & Emanuel Melachrinoudis, 2020. "Reliable maximin–maxisum locations for maximum service availability on tree networks vulnerable to disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 669-701, March.
    10. Novak, Antonin & Sucha, Premysl & Hanzalek, Zdenek, 2019. "Scheduling with uncertain processing times in mixed-criticality systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 687-703.
    11. Jacek Błażewicz & Klaus H. Ecker & Erwin Pesch & Günter Schmidt & Jan Węglarz, 2007. "Handbook on Scheduling," International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-32220-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    2. Yin, Yunqiang & Luo, Zunhao & Wang, Dujuan & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Wasserstein distance‐based distributionally robust parallel‐machine scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Novak, Antonin & Sucha, Premysl & Novotny, Matej & Stec, Richard & Hanzalek, Zdenek, 2022. "Scheduling jobs with normally distributed processing times on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 422-441.
    5. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    6. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    7. Guopeng Song & Roel Leus, 2022. "Parallel Machine Scheduling Under Uncertainty: Models and Exact Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3059-3079, November.
    8. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    9. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "Strategies for project scheduling with alternative subgraphs under uncertainty: similar and dissimilar sets of schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 38-53.
    10. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    11. Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo & Newman, Alexandra, 2024. "A target-time-windows technique for project scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 792-806.
    12. Monfared, M.A.S. & Rezazadeh, Masoumeh & Alipour, Zohreh, 2022. "Road networks reliability estimations and optimizations: A Bi-directional bottom-up, top-down approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Briand, Cyril & La, H. Trung & Erschler, Jacques, 2006. "A new sufficient condition of optimality for the two-machine flowshop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 712-722, March.
    14. Antonio J. Conejo & Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Runhao Zhang, 2021. "Robust Capacity Planning for Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1533-1550, October.
    15. Zhu, Xia & Ruiz, Rubén & Li, Shiyu & Li, Xiaoping, 2017. "An effective heuristic for project scheduling with resource availability cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 746-762.
    16. Maxim A. Maron, 2018. "Diagnostics of Projects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 18-30.
    17. Shi Chen & Hau Lee, 2017. "Incentive Alignment and Coordination of Project Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1025, April.
    18. Wanting Zhang & Ming Zeng & Peng Guo & Kun Wen, 2022. "Variable Neighborhood Search for Multi-Cycle Medical Waste Recycling Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Berghman, Lotte & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Practical solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 787-799.
    20. Van de Vonder, Stijn & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2008. "Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 723-733, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:309:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04445-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.