IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v286y2020i1d10.1007_s10479-018-2993-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliable maximin–maxisum locations for maximum service availability on tree networks vulnerable to disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • José A. Santiváñez

    (Universidad del Turabo)

  • Emanuel Melachrinoudis

    (Northeastern University)

Abstract

In this era of ubiquitous networks that become increasingly vulnerable to disruptions, network reliability has emerged as a critical issue in their design and operation. Businesses and individuals become ever more dependent on networks and demand reliable delivery of critical services every time. This paper finds Pareto optimal locations for a single facility on an existing tree network that maximizes service availability to customers by considering both the average and the lowest level of service delivery with respect to all customers. Examples are the location of decision entities on information infrastructures, servers or databases on computer networks, control systems on telecommunication networks, critical information on social networks, supply centers on supply chain networks, and location of emergency response facilities to intentional or natural disasters. Model properties are identified in decision and objective space and used to develop an efficient algorithm for finding the efficient and the non-dominated sets. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the algorithm and to show special conditions for the efficient and non-dominated sets to be continuous.

Suggested Citation

  • José A. Santiváñez & Emanuel Melachrinoudis, 2020. "Reliable maximin–maxisum locations for maximum service availability on tree networks vulnerable to disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 669-701, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:286:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2993-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2993-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-2993-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-018-2993-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajan Batta & June M. Dolan & Nirup N. Krishnamurthy, 1989. "The Maximal Expected Covering Location Problem: Revisited," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 277-287, November.
    2. Charles ReVelle & Kathleen Hogan, 1989. "The Maximum Availability Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 192-200, August.
    3. Mark S. Daskin, 1983. "A Maximum Expected Covering Location Model: Formulation, Properties and Heuristic Solution," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 48-70, February.
    4. S. L. Hakimi, 1964. "Optimum Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 450-459, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Purva Grover & Arpan Kumar Kar & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management: insights from the review of academic literature and social media discussions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 177-213, January.
    2. Aurelija Burinskienė, 2021. "Designing a Multi-Stage Transport System Serving e-Commerce Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Antonin Novak & Zdenek Hanzalek, 2022. "Computing the execution probability of jobs with replication in mixed-criticality schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 209-232, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    2. Wang, Wei & Wu, Shining & Wang, Shuaian & Zhen, Lu & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "Emergency facility location problems in logistics: Status and perspectives," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Rajagopalan, Hari K. & Saydam, Cem, 2009. "A minimum expected response model: Formulation, heuristic solution, and application," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 253-262, December.
    4. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Peng, Fan, 2013. "A supporting station model for reliable infrastructure location design under interdependent disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 80-93.
    5. Su, Qiang & Luo, Qinyi & Huang, Samuel H., 2015. "Cost-effective analyses for emergency medical services deployment: A case study in Shanghai," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 112-123.
    6. Akdogan, M. Altan & Bayındır, Z. Pelin & Iyigun, Cem, 2023. "An analysis of ambulance location problem from an equity perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Shariat-Mohaymany, Afshin & Babaei, Mohsen & Moadi, Saeed & Amiripour, Sayyed Mahdi, 2012. "Linear upper-bound unavailability set covering models for locating ambulances: Application to Tehran rural roads," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 263-272.
    8. Zvi Drezner & Vladimir Marianov & George O. Wesolowsky, 2016. "Maximizing the minimum cover probability by emergency facilities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 349-362, November.
    9. Nilay Noyan, 2010. "Alternate risk measures for emergency medical service system design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 559-589, December.
    10. Ansari, Sina & Başdere, Mehmet & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Smilowitz, Karen, 2018. "Advancements in continuous approximation models for logistics and transportation systems: 1996–2016," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 229-252.
    11. O’Hanley, Jesse R. & Scaparra, M. Paola & García, Sergio, 2013. "Probability chains: A general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 63-75.
    12. Yun Bai & Xiaopeng Li & Fan Peng & Xin Wang & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2015. "Effects of Disruption Risks on Biorefinery Location Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Boyacı, Burak & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2015. "Approximation methods for large-scale spatial queueing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 151-181.
    14. Bélanger, V. & Lanzarone, E. & Nicoletta, V. & Ruiz, A. & Soriano, P., 2020. "A recursive simulation-optimization framework for the ambulance location and dispatching problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 713-725.
    15. Sunarin Chanta & Maria Mayorga & Laura McLay, 2014. "Improving emergency service in rural areas: a bi-objective covering location model for EMS systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 133-159, October.
    16. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    17. Brotcorne, Luce & Laporte, Gilbert & Semet, Frederic, 2003. "Ambulance location and relocation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 451-463, June.
    18. Sardar Ansari & Laura Albert McLay & Maria E. Mayorga, 2017. "A Maximum Expected Covering Problem for District Design," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 376-390, February.
    19. Mark S. Daskin, 2008. "What you should know about location modeling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 283-294, June.
    20. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Karlaftis, Matthew G. & Skabardonis, Alexander, 2009. "A spatial queuing model for the emergency vehicle districting and location problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 798-811, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:286:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2993-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.