IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v292y2020i1d10.1007_s10479-019-03353-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-step stochastic approach for operating rooms scheduling in multi-resource environment

Author

Listed:
  • Arezoo Atighehchian

    (University of Isfahan)

  • Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Pejman Shadpour

    (Iran University of Medical Sciences)

  • Kamran Kianfar

    (University of Isfahan)

Abstract

Planning and scheduling of operating rooms (ORs) is important for hospitals to improve efficiency and achieve high quality of service. Due to significant uncertainty in surgery durations, scheduling of ORs can be very challenging. In this paper, surgical case scheduling problem with uncertain duration of surgeries in multi resource environment is investigated. We present a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer programming model, named SOS, with the objective of total ORs idle time and overtime. Also, in this paper a two-step approach is proposed for solving the model based on the L-shaped algorithm. Proposing the model in a multi resources environment with considering real-life limitations in academic hospitals and developing an approach for solving this stochastic model efficiently form the main contributions of this paper. The model is evaluated through several numerical experiments based on real data from Hasheminejad Kidney Center (HKC) in Iran. The solutions of SOS are compared with the deterministic solutions in several real instances. Numerical results show that SOS enjoys a better performance in 97% of the cases. Furthermore, the results of comparing with actual schedules applied in HKC reveal a notable reduction of OR idle time and over time which illustrate the efficiency of the proposed model in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Arezoo Atighehchian & Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri & Pejman Shadpour & Kamran Kianfar, 2020. "A two-step stochastic approach for operating rooms scheduling in multi-resource environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 191-214, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:292:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03353-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03353-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03353-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03353-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Keller & GÜzİn Bayraksan, 2010. "Scheduling jobs sharing multiple resources under uncertainty: A stochastic programming approach," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 16-30.
    2. Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Fung, Richard Y.K., 2014. "A column-generation-based heuristic algorithm for solving operating theater planning problem under stochastic demand and surgery cancellation risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 28-36.
    3. Sakine Batun & Brian T. Denton & Todd R. Huschka & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2011. "Operating Room Pooling and Parallel Surgery Processing Under Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 220-237, May.
    4. S. Ayca Erdogan & Brian Denton, 2013. "Dynamic Appointment Scheduling of a Stochastic Server with Uncertain Demand," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 116-132, February.
    5. Min, Daiki & Yih, Yuehwern, 2010. "Scheduling elective surgery under uncertainty and downstream capacity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 642-652, November.
    6. Brian T. Denton & Andrew J. Miller & Hari J. Balasubramanian & Todd R. Huschka, 2010. "Optimal Allocation of Surgery Blocks to Operating Rooms Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 802-816, August.
    7. Brian Denton & James Viapiano & Andrea Vogl, 2007. "Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 13-24, February.
    8. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    9. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    10. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossein Hashemi Doulabi & Soheyl Khalilpourazari, 2023. "Stochastic weekly operating room planning with an exponential number of scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 643-664, September.
    2. Jian-Jun Wang & Zongli Dai & Ai-Chih Chang & Jim Junmin Shi, 2022. "Surgical scheduling by Fuzzy model considering inpatient beds shortage under uncertain surgery durations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 463-505, August.
    3. Çelik, Batuhan & Gul, Serhat & Çelik, Melih, 2023. "A stochastic programming approach to surgery scheduling under parallel processing principle," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Jian-Jun Wang & Zongli Dai & Wenxuan Zhang & Jim Junmin Shi, 2023. "Operating room scheduling for non-operating room anesthesia with emergency uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 565-588, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    3. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Zhang, Jian & Dridi, Mahjoub & El Moudni, Abdellah, 2020. "Column-generation-based heuristic approaches to stochastic surgery scheduling with downstream capacity constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Marques, Inês & Captivo, M. Eugénia, 2017. "Different stakeholders’ perspectives for a surgical case assignment problem: Deterministic and robust approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 260-278.
    6. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    7. Wang, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2019. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for surgery block allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 740-753.
    8. Anders Reenberg Andersen & Thomas Jacob Riis Stidsen & Line Blander Reinhardt, 2020. "Simulation-Based Rolling Horizon Scheduling for Operating Theatres," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C., 2020. "Surgical scheduling under uncertainty by approximate dynamic programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Hossein Hashemi Doulabi & Soheyl Khalilpourazari, 2023. "Stochastic weekly operating room planning with an exponential number of scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 643-664, September.
    11. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Mahdi Noorizadegan & Abbas Seifi, 2018. "An efficient computational method for large scale surgery scheduling problems with chance constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 535-561, March.
    13. Aida Jebali & Ali Diabat, 2015. "A stochastic model for operating room planning under capacity constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7252-7270, December.
    14. Morteza Lalmazloumian & M. Fazle Baki & Majid Ahmadi, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic optimization framework to allocate operating room capacity in publicly-funded hospitals under uncertainty," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 238-260, June.
    15. Azar, Macarena & Carrasco, Rodrigo A. & Mondschein, Susana, 2022. "Dealing with uncertain surgery times in operating room scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 377-394.
    16. Sagnol, Guillaume & Barner, Christoph & Borndörfer, Ralf & Grima, Mickaël & Seeling, Matthes & Spies, Claudia & Wernecke, Klaus, 2018. "Robust allocation of operating rooms: A cutting plane approach to handle lognormal case durations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 420-435.
    17. Gökalp, E. & Gülpınar, N. & Doan, X.V., 2023. "Dynamic surgery management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 832-844.
    18. Sakine Batun & Brian T. Denton & Todd R. Huschka & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2011. "Operating Room Pooling and Parallel Surgery Processing Under Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 220-237, May.
    19. Santos, Daniel & Marques, Inês, 2022. "Designing master surgery schedules with downstream unit integration via stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 834-852.
    20. Roshanaei, Vahid & Luong, Curtiss & Aleman, Dionne M. & Urbach, David R., 2020. "Reformulation, linearization, and decomposition techniques for balanced distributed operating room scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:292:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03353-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.