IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v256y2017i2d10.1007_s10479-016-2249-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic dominance based approach to consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation with multiple priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Hong-Bin Yan

    (East China University of Science and Technology)

  • Tieju Ma

    (East China University of Science and Technology)

  • Songsak Sriboonchitta

    (Chiang Mai University)

  • Van-Nam Huynh

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Nowadays, with the increasing of aesthetic products, it becomes more and more important and quite difficult for consumers to choose their preferred products, especially the ones whose artistic and aesthetic aspects play a crucial role in consumer purchase decisions. Taking Kansei as one quality aspect of products, consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation focuses on evaluation of existing commercial products based on consumers’ Kansei preferences. This paper proposes a stochastic dominance based approach to consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation with multiple priorities. Particularly, given a consumer’s preferences, the concept of stochastic dominance is used to build an evaluation function for each Kansei attribute. Then, the importance weights captured by a priority hierarchy of Kansei attributes, together with the fuzzy majority, are incorporated into the aggregation of individual stochastic dominance degrees into an overall one. An application to the hand-painted Kutani cups in Ishikawa, Japan, is conducted to illustrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach. It is seen that the proposed approach outperforms the existing research in terms of easy of use and better decision-support to the consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong-Bin Yan & Tieju Ma & Songsak Sriboonchitta & Van-Nam Huynh, 2017. "A stochastic dominance based approach to consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation with multiple priorities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(2), pages 329-357, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:256:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2249-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2249-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-016-2249-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-016-2249-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Nureize & J. Watada & S. Wang, 2014. "Fuzzy random regression based multi-attribute evaluation and its application to oil palm fruit grading," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 299-315, August.
    2. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and the State," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 19-38, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Hong-Bin Yan & Van-Nam Huynh & Yoshiteru Nakamori, 2012. "A group nonadditive multiattribute consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation model with an application to traditional crafts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 325-354, May.
    4. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.
    5. Fan, Zhi-Ping & Liu, Yang & Feng, Bo, 2010. "A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on pairwise comparisons of alternatives with random evaluations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 906-915, December.
    6. Zeng, Xianyi & Ruan, Da & Koehl, Ludovic, 2008. "Intelligent sensory evaluation: Concepts, implementations, and applications," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 443-452.
    7. Kuei-Hu Chang, 2016. "A novel reliability allocation approach using the OWA tree and soft set," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 3-22, September.
    8. Yadav, Om Prakash & Goel, Parveen S., 2008. "Customer satisfaction driven quality improvement target planning for product development in automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 997-1011, June.
    9. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Masakazu Ohmi, 2016. "Multiattribute decision analysis using strict preference relations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 379-400, October.
    10. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju, 2015. "A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 815-829.
    11. Amos Tversky & Itamar Simonson, 1993. "Context-Dependent Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1179-1189, October.
    12. Chen, Chun-Chih & Chuang, Ming-Chuen, 2008. "Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 667-681, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Zhi-Ping & Feng, Bo & Suo, Wei-Lan, 2009. "A fuzzy linguistic method for evaluating collaboration satisfaction of NPD team using mutual-evaluation information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 547-557, December.
    2. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju & Huynh, Van-Nam, 2017. "On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-117.
    3. Chao He & Zhongkai Li & Dengzhuo Liu & Guangyu Zou & Shuai Wang, 2023. "Improving the functional performances for product family by mining online reviews," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 2809-2824, August.
    4. Hong-Bin Yan & Van-Nam Huynh & Yoshiteru Nakamori, 2012. "A group nonadditive multiattribute consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation model with an application to traditional crafts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 325-354, May.
    5. Michel Grabisch, 2015. "Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Recent Developments," Post-Print hal-01302377, HAL.
    6. Jiang, Yanping & Liang, Xia & Liang, Haiming & Yang, Ningman, 2018. "Multiple criteria decision making with interval stochastic variables: A method based on interval stochastic dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 632-643.
    7. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    8. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    9. Moore, Don A., 1999. "Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 146-165, May.
    10. Flores, Alvaro & Berbeglia, Gerardo & Van Hentenryck, Pascal, 2019. "Assortment optimization under the Sequential Multinomial Logit Model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1052-1064.
    11. Christoph Engel, 2006. "The Difficult Reception of Rigorous Descriptive Social Science in the Law," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2006_1, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    12. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    13. Donald R. Haurin & Stuart S. Rosenthal, 2009. "Language, Agglomeration and Hispanic Homeownership," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 155-183, June.
    14. Kazagli, Evanthia & de Lapparent, Matthieu, 2023. "A discrete choice modeling framework of heterogenous decision rules accounting for non-trading behavior," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    15. Jong Won Min, 2019. "The Influence of Stigma and Views on Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness on Service Use by Age and Ethnicity: Evidence From the CDC BRFSS 2007, 2009, and 2012," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    16. Jonathan C. Pettibone, 2012. "Testing the effect of time pressure on asymmetric dominance and compromise decoys in choice," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(4), pages 513-523, July.
    17. Alwang, Jeffrey & Larochelle, Catherine & Barrera, Victor, 2017. "Farm Decision Making and Gender: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 117-129.
    18. Yanina Welp & Ferran Urgell & Eduard Aibar, 2007. "From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Administration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 299-316, December.
    19. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    20. Brent Hammer & Helen Vallianatos & Candace Nykiforuk & Laura Nieuwendyk, 2015. "Perceptions of healthy eating in four Alberta communities: a photovoice project," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 649-662, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:256:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2249-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.