IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v254y2017i1d10.1007_s10479-017-2474-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of covariance misspecification in risk-based portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • David Ardia

    (University of Neuchâtel
    Université Laval)

  • Guido Bolliger

    (University of Neuchâtel
    Syz Asset Management (Suisse) SA)

  • Kris Boudt

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Jean-Philippe Gagnon-Fleury

    (Université Laval)

Abstract

The equal-risk-contribution, inverse-volatility weighted, maximum-diversification and minimum-variance portfolio weights are all direct functions of the estimated covariance matrix. We perform a Monte Carlo study to assess the impact of covariance matrix misspecification to these risk-based portfolios at the daily, weekly and monthly forecasting horizon. Our results show that the equal-risk-contribution and inverse-volatility weighted portfolio weights are relatively robust to covariance misspecification. In contrast, the minimum-variance portfolio weights are highly sensitive to errors in both the estimated variances and correlations, while errors in the estimated correlations can have a large effect on the weights of the maximum-diversification portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ardia & Guido Bolliger & Kris Boudt & Jean-Philippe Gagnon-Fleury, 2017. "The impact of covariance misspecification in risk-based portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:254:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2474-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2474-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-017-2474-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-017-2474-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis K.C. Chan & Jason Karceski & Josef Lakonishok, 1999. "On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk Model," NBER Working Papers 7039, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Maria Scutellà & Raffaella Recchia, 2013. "Robust portfolio asset allocation and risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 145-169, April.
    3. Robert F. Engle & Kevin Sheppard, 2001. "Theoretical and Empirical properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH," NBER Working Papers 8554, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Philippe Bertrand & Vincent Lapointe, 2018. "Risk-based strategies: the social responsibility of investment universes does matter," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(2), pages 413-429, March.
    5. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2003. "Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 603-621, December.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4688 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Stoyan Stoyanov & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi, 2013. "Sensitivity of portfolio VaR and CVaR to portfolio return characteristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 169-187, May.
    8. Woo Kim & Jang Kim & So Ahn & Frank Fabozzi, 2013. "What do robust equity portfolio models really do?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 141-168, May.
    9. Engle, Robert, 2002. "Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 339-350, July.
    10. Chan, Louis K C & Karceski, Jason & Lakonishok, Josef, 1999. "On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk Model," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(5), pages 937-974.
    11. David Ardia & Kris Boudt, 2013. "Implied Expected Returns and the Choice of a Mean-Variance Efficient Portfolio Proxy," Cahiers de recherche 1328, CIRPEE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olessia Caillé & Daria Onori, 2019. "Conditional Risk-Based Portfolio," Finance, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, vol. 40(2), pages 77-117.
    2. Muhinyuza, Stanislas & Bodnar, Taras & Lindholm, Mathias, 2020. "A test on the location of the tangency portfolio on the set of feasible portfolios," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    3. Nathan Lassance & Frédéric Vrins, 2021. "Minimum Rényi entropy portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 23-46, April.
    4. Zhang, Xi & Li, Jian, 2018. "Credit and market risks measurement in carbon financing for Chinese banks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 549-557.
    5. Prayut Jain & Shashi Jain, 2019. "Can Machine Learning-Based Portfolios Outperform Traditional Risk-Based Portfolios? The Need to Account for Covariance Misspecification," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Thomas Conlon & John Cotter & Iason Kynigakis, 2021. "Machine Learning and Factor-Based Portfolio Optimization," Working Papers 202111, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    7. A. Sinem Uysal & Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2024. "End-to-end risk budgeting portfolio optimization with neural networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 397-426, August.
    8. Kei Nakagawa & Mitsuyoshi Imamura & Kenichi Yoshida, 2018. "Risk-Based Portfolios with Large Dynamic Covariance Matrices," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Marco Neffelli, 2018. "Target Matrix Estimators in Risk-Based Portfolios," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Gilles Boevi Koumou, 2020. "Diversification and portfolio theory: a review," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(3), pages 267-312, September.
    11. Kei Nakagawa & Shuhei Noma & Masaya Abe, 2020. "RM-CVaR: Regularized Multiple $\beta$-CVaR Portfolio," Papers 2004.13347, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    12. Li, Xiaoyue & Uysal, A. Sinem & Mulvey, John M., 2022. "Multi-period portfolio optimization using model predictive control with mean-variance and risk parity frameworks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1158-1176.
    13. Ardia, David & Boudt, Kris & Hartmann, Stefan & Nguyen, Giang, 2022. "Properties of the Margrabe Best-of-two strategy to tactical asset allocation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Giorgio Costa & Roy Kwon, 2020. "A robust framework for risk parity portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 447-466, September.
    15. Caldeira, João F. & Santos, André A.P. & Torrent, Hudson S., 2023. "Semiparametric portfolios: Improving portfolio performance by exploiting non-linearities in firm characteristics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Ayse Sinem Uysal & Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2021. "End-to-End Risk Budgeting Portfolio Optimization with Neural Networks," Papers 2107.04636, arXiv.org.
    17. Peter Nystrup & Stephen Boyd & Erik Lindström & Henrik Madsen, 2019. "Multi-period portfolio selection with drawdown control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 245-271, November.
    18. Debjani Palit & Victor R. Prybutok, 2024. "A Study of Hierarchical Risk Parity in Portfolio Construction," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(3), pages 106-125, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hafner, Christian M. & Linton, Oliver B. & Tang, Haihan, 2020. "Estimation of a multiplicative correlation structure in the large dimensional case," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 431-470.
    2. Hafner, Christian M. & Reznikova, Olga, 2012. "On the estimation of dynamic conditional correlation models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3533-3545.
    3. Gopal K. Basak & Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2009. "Jackknife Estimator for Tracking Error Variance of Optimal Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 990-1002, June.
    4. Caldeira, João F & Moura, Guilherme Valle & Santos, André Alves Portela, 2013. "Seleção de carteiras utilizando o modelo Fama-French-Carhart," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 67(1), April.
    5. Ruili Sun & Tiefeng Ma & Shuangzhe Liu & Milind Sathye, 2019. "Improved Covariance Matrix Estimation for Portfolio Risk Measurement: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, March.
    6. Santos, André A.P. & Moura, Guilherme V., 2014. "Dynamic factor multivariate GARCH model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 606-617.
    7. Johannes Bock, 2018. "An updated review of (sub-)optimal diversification models," Papers 1811.08255, arXiv.org.
    8. Fotis Papailias & Dimitrios Thomakos, 2015. "Covariance averaging for improved estimation and portfolio allocation," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 29(1), pages 31-59, February.
    9. Syriopoulos, Theodore & Roumpis, Efthimios, 2009. "Dynamic correlations and volatility effects in the Balkan equity markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 565-587, October.
    10. Majdoub, Jihed & Mansour, Walid, 2014. "Islamic equity market integration and volatility spillover between emerging and US stock markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 452-470.
    11. Ahmed, Shamim & Bu, Ziwen & Symeonidis, Lazaros & Tsvetanov, Daniel, 2023. "Which factor model? A systematic return covariation perspective," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. repec:fgv:epgrbe:v:67:n:1:a:3 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Yilmaz, Tolgahan, 2010. "Improving Portfolio Optimization by DCC And DECO GARCH: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange," MPRA Paper 27314, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    15. Massimiliano Caporin & Michael McAleer, 2010. "Ranking Multivariate GARCH Models by Problem Dimension," CARF F-Series CARF-F-219, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    16. Maillet, Bertrand & Tokpavi, Sessi & Vaucher, Benoit, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 289-299.
    17. Mishra, Anil V., 2015. "Measures of equity home bias puzzle," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 293-312.
    18. Bollerslev, Tim & Patton, Andrew J. & Quaedvlieg, Rogier, 2018. "Modeling and forecasting (un)reliable realized covariances for more reliable financial decisions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 71-91.
    19. Frahm, Gabriel & Memmel, Christoph, 2008. "Dominating estimators for the global minimum variance portfolio," Discussion Papers in Econometrics and Statistics 2/08, University of Cologne, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics.
    20. Penaranda, Francisco, 2007. "Portfolio choice beyond the traditional approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Christoffersen, Peter & Langlois, Hugues, 2013. "The Joint Dynamics of Equity Market Factors," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 1371-1404, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:254:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2474-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.