IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v339y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05539-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

End-to-end risk budgeting portfolio optimization with neural networks

Author

Listed:
  • A. Sinem Uysal

    (Princeton University)

  • Xiaoyue Li

    (Princeton University)

  • John M. Mulvey

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University)

Abstract

Traditional stochastic optimization in financial operations research applications consist of a two-step process: (1) calibrate parameters of the assumed stochastic processes by minimizing a loss function, and (2) optimize a decision vector by reference to the investor’s reward/risk measures. Yet this approach can encounter the error maximization problem. We combine the steps in a single unified feedforward network, called end-to-end. Two variants are examined: a model-free neural network, and a model-based network in which a risk budgeting model is embedded as an implicit layer in a deep neural network. We performed computational experiments with major ETF indices and found that the model-based approach leads to robust performance out-of-sample (2017–2021) when maximizing the Sharpe ratio as the training objective, achieving Sharpe ratio of 1.16 versus 0.83 for a pure risk budgeting model. Simulation studies show statistically significant difference between model-based and model-free approaches as well. We extend the end-to-end algorithm by filtering assets with low volatility and low returns, boosting the out-of-sample Sharpe ratio to 1.24. The end-to-end approach can be readily applied to a wide variety of financial and other optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Sinem Uysal & Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2024. "End-to-end risk budgeting portfolio optimization with neural networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 397-426, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05539-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05539-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05539-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05539-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. A. H. Dempster & Gautam Mitra & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2007. "Introduction to the special issue on financial planning in a dynamical setting," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 111-112.
    2. repec:inm:orijoo:v:3:y:2021:i:4:p:398-417 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jean-Charles Richard & Thierry Roncalli, 2019. "Constrained Risk Budgeting Portfolios: Theory, Algorithms, Applications & Puzzles," Papers 1902.05710, arXiv.org.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4688 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. David Ardia & Guido Bolliger & Kris Boudt & Jean-Philippe Gagnon-Fleury, 2017. "The impact of covariance misspecification in risk-based portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Dimitris Bertsimas & Nathan Kallus, 2020. "From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1025-1044, March.
    7. Xi Bai & Katya Scheinberg & Reha Tutuncu, 2016. "Least-squares approach to risk parity in portfolio selection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 357-376, March.
    8. Xiaoyue Li & A. Sinem Uysal & John M. Mulvey, 2021. "Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization using Model Predictive Control with Mean-Variance and Risk Parity Frameworks," Papers 2103.10813, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayse Sinem Uysal & Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2021. "End-to-End Risk Budgeting Portfolio Optimization with Neural Networks," Papers 2107.04636, arXiv.org.
    2. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    3. Bernardo K. Pagnoncelli & Domingo Ramírez & Hamed Rahimian & Arturo Cifuentes, 2023. "A Synthetic Data-Plus-Features Driven Approach for Portfolio Optimization," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 187-204, June.
    4. Li, Xiaoyue & Uysal, A. Sinem & Mulvey, John M., 2022. "Multi-period portfolio optimization using model predictive control with mean-variance and risk parity frameworks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1158-1176.
    5. Gilles Boevi Koumou, 2020. "Diversification and portfolio theory: a review," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(3), pages 267-312, September.
    6. Giorgio Costa & Roy Kwon, 2020. "A robust framework for risk parity portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 447-466, September.
    7. Serrano, Breno & Minner, Stefan & Schiffer, Maximilian & Vidal, Thibaut, 2024. "Bilevel optimization for feature selection in the data-driven newsvendor problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 703-714.
    8. Keliang Wang & Leonardo Lozano & Carlos Cardonha & David Bergman, 2023. "Optimizing over an Ensemble of Trained Neural Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 652-674, May.
    9. Meng Qi & Ying Cao & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Conditional Quantile Prediction with Fixed Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1639-1658, March.
    10. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Debjani Palit & Victor R. Prybutok, 2024. "A Study of Hierarchical Risk Parity in Portfolio Construction," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(3), pages 106-125, September.
    12. Andrew Butler & Roy Kwon, 2021. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Papers 2112.07464, arXiv.org.
    13. Liu, Congzheng & Letchford, Adam N. & Svetunkov, Ivan, 2022. "Newsvendor problems: An integrated method for estimation and optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 590-601.
    14. Corredera, Alberto & Ruiz, Carlos, 2023. "Prescriptive selection of machine learning hyperparameters with applications in power markets: Retailer’s optimal trading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 370-388.
    15. Shuaian Wang & Xuecheng Tian, 2023. "A Deficiency of the Predict-Then-Optimize Framework: Decreased Decision Quality with Increased Data Size," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-9, July.
    16. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    17. Zhang, Cheng & Gong, Xiaomin & Zhang, Jingshu & Chen, Zhiwei, 2023. "Dynamic portfolio allocation for financial markets: A perspective of competitive-cum-compensatory strategy," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2021. "Data-driven integration of norm-penalized mean-variance portfolios," Papers 2112.07016, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    19. Sel, Burakhan & Minner, Stefan, 2022. "A hedging policy for seaborne forward freight markets based on probabilistic forecasts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2020. "Relative utility bounds for empirically optimal portfolios," Papers 2006.05204, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05539-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.