IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v258y2017i2p743-760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the solution variability reduction of Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming applied to energy planning

Author

Listed:
  • Soares, Murilo Pereira
  • Street, Alexandre
  • Valladão, Davi Michel

Abstract

In the hydrothermal energy operation planning of Brazil and other hydro-dependent countries, Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP) computes a risk-averse optimal policy that often considers river-inflow autoregressive models. In practical applications, these models induce an undesirable variability of primal (thermal generation) and dual (marginal cost and spot price) solutions that are highly sensitive to changes in current inflow conditions. This work proposes two differing approaches to stabilize SDDP solutions to the energy operation planning problem: the first approach regularizes primal variables by considering an additional penalty on thermal dispatch revisions over time, and the second approach indirectly reduces thermal generation and marginal cost variability by disregarding past inflow information in the cost-to-go function and compensates with an increase in risk aversion. For comparison purposes, we assess solution quality with a set of proposed indexes summarizing each important aspect of a hydrothermal operation planning policy. In conclusion, we show that it is possible to obtain high-quality solutions in comparison to current benchmarks with significantly reduced variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Soares, Murilo Pereira & Street, Alexandre & Valladão, Davi Michel, 2017. "On the solution variability reduction of Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming applied to energy planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 743-760.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:258:y:2017:i:2:p:743-760
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171630707X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shapiro, Alexander & Tekaya, Wajdi & da Costa, Joari Paulo & Soares, Murilo Pereira, 2013. "Risk neutral and risk averse Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 375-391.
    2. Z. L. Chen & W. B. Powell, 1999. "Convergent Cutting-Plane and Partial-Sampling Algorithm for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs with Recourse," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 497-524, September.
    3. K. Linowsky & A. B. Philpott, 2005. "On the Convergence of Sampling-Based Decomposition Algorithms for Multistage Stochastic Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 349-366, May.
    4. Shapiro, Alexander, 2011. "Analysis of stochastic dual dynamic programming method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 63-72, February.
    5. Rudloff, Birgit & Street, Alexandre & Valladão, Davi M., 2014. "Time consistency and risk averse dynamic decision models: Definition, interpretation and practical consequences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 743-750.
    6. John R. Birge, 1985. "Decomposition and Partitioning Methods for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 989-1007, October.
    7. Philpott, A.B. & de Matos, V.L., 2012. "Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 470-483.
    8. P. Girardeau & V. Leclere & A. B. Philpott, 2015. "On the Convergence of Decomposition Methods for Multistage Stochastic Convex Programs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 130-145, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, J. & Nie, S. & Shan, B.G. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Liu, Z.P., 2019. "Development of an interval-credibility-chance constrained energy-water nexus system planning model—a case study of Xiamen, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 677-693.
    2. Lorenzo Reus & Guillermo Alexander Sepúlveda-Hurtado, 2023. "Foreign exchange trading and management with the stochastic dual dynamic programming method," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-38, December.
    3. Hohmann, Marc & Warrington, Joseph & Lygeros, John, 2020. "A moment and sum-of-squares extension of dual dynamic programming with application to nonlinear energy storage problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 16-32.
    4. Davi Valladão & Thuener Silva & Marcus Poggi, 2019. "Time-consistent risk-constrained dynamic portfolio optimization with transactional costs and time-dependent returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 379-405, November.
    5. Moreira, Alexandre & Pozo, David & Street, Alexandre & Sauma, Enzo & Strbac, Goran, 2021. "Climate‐aware generation and transmission expansion planning: A three‐stage robust optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1099-1118.
    6. Lorenzo Reus & Rodolfo Prado, 2022. "Need to Meet Investment Goals? Track Synthetic Indexes with the SDDP Method," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 47-69, June.
    7. Mateus Waga & Davi Valladão & Alexandre Street & Thuener Silva, 2022. "Disentangling Shareholder Risk Aversion from Leverage-Dependent Borrowing Cost on Corporate Policies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Chen, X.P. & Hewitt, N. & Li, Z.T. & Wu, Q.M. & Yuan, Xufeng & Roskilly, Tony, 2017. "Dynamic programming for optimal operation of a biofuel micro CHP-HES system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 132-141.
    9. Jing Liu & Yongping Li & Guohe Huang & Cai Suo & Shuo Yin, 2017. "An Interval Fuzzy-Stochastic Chance-Constrained Programming Based Energy-Water Nexus Model for Planning Electric Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Paula Medina Maçaira & Yasmin Monteiro Cyrillo & Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira & Reinaldo Castro Souza, 2019. "Including Wind Power Generation in Brazil’s Long-Term Optimization Model for Energy Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Ackooij & X. Warin, 2020. "On conditional cuts for stochastic dual dynamic programming," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 173-199, June.
    2. de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2016. "Stochastic hydro-thermal scheduling optimization: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 382-395.
    3. Wim Ackooij & Welington Oliveira & Yongjia Song, 2019. "On level regularization with normal solutions in decomposition methods for multistage stochastic programming problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 1-42, September.
    4. Davi Valladão & Thuener Silva & Marcus Poggi, 2019. "Time-consistent risk-constrained dynamic portfolio optimization with transactional costs and time-dependent returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 379-405, November.
    5. Andre Luiz Diniz & Maria Elvira P. Maceira & Cesar Luis V. Vasconcellos & Debora Dias J. Penna, 2020. "A combined SDDP/Benders decomposition approach with a risk-averse surface concept for reservoir operation in long term power generation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 649-681, September.
    6. Murwan Siddig & Yongjia Song, 2022. "Adaptive partition-based SDDP algorithms for multistage stochastic linear programming with fixed recourse," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 201-250, January.
    7. Vincent Guigues, 2014. "SDDP for some interstage dependent risk-averse problems and application to hydro-thermal planning," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 167-203, January.
    8. Mateus Waga & Davi Valladão & Alexandre Street & Thuener Silva, 2022. "Disentangling Shareholder Risk Aversion from Leverage-Dependent Borrowing Cost on Corporate Policies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Schur, Rouven & Gönsch, Jochen & Hassler, Michael, 2019. "Time-consistent, risk-averse dynamic pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 587-603.
    10. Vincent Guigues & Renato D. C. Monteiro, 2021. "Stochastic Dynamic Cutting Plane for Multistage Stochastic Convex Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 513-559, May.
    11. Zhou, Shaorui & Zhang, Hui & Shi, Ning & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Fan, 2020. "A new convergent hybrid learning algorithm for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 33-46.
    12. Liu, Rui Peng & Shapiro, Alexander, 2020. "Risk neutral reformulation approach to risk averse stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 21-31.
    13. Michelle Bandarra & Vincent Guigues, 2021. "Single cut and multicut stochastic dual dynamic programming with cut selection for multistage stochastic linear programs: convergence proof and numerical experiments," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 125-148, June.
    14. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Pritchard, Geoffrey, 2015. "Stochastic inflow modeling for hydropower scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 496-504.
    16. Thuener Silva & Davi Valladão & Tito Homem-de-Mello, 2021. "A data-driven approach for a class of stochastic dynamic optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 687-729, December.
    17. Park, Jangho & Bayraksan, Güzin, 2023. "A multistage distributionally robust optimization approach to water allocation under climate uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 849-871.
    18. Oscar Dowson & Lea Kapelevich, 2021. "SDDP.jl : A Julia Package for Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 27-33, January.
    19. Escudero, Laureano F. & Monge, Juan F. & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2020. "On pricing-based equilibrium for network expansion planning. A multi-period bilevel approach under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 262-279.
    20. Andy Philpott & Vitor de Matos & Erlon Finardi, 2013. "On Solving Multistage Stochastic Programs with Coherent Risk Measures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 957-970, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:258:y:2017:i:2:p:743-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.