IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v187y2011i1p89-11910.1007-s10479-010-0799-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal sequential inspection policies

Author

Listed:
  • Endre Boros
  • Noam Goldberg
  • Paul Kantor
  • Jonathan Word

Abstract

We consider the problem of combining a given set of diagnostic tests into an inspection system to classify items of interest (cases) with maximum accuracy such that the cost of performing the tests does not exceed a given budget constraint. One motivating application is sequencing diagnostic tests for container inspection, where the diagnostic tests may correspond to radiation sensors, document checks, or imaging systems. We consider mixtures of decision trees as inspection systems following the work of Boros et al. (Nav. Res. Logist. 56:404–420, 2009 ). We establish some properties of efficient inspection systems and characterize the optimal classification of cases, based on some of their test scores. The measure of performance is the fraction of all cases in a specific class of interest, which are classified correctly. We propose a dynamic programming algorithm that constructs more complex policies by iteratively prefixing devices to a subset of policies and thereby enumerating all of the efficient (i.e., undominated) inspection policies in the two dimensional cost-detection space. Our inspection policies may sequence an arbitrary number of tests and are not restricted in the branching factor. Our approach directly solves the bi-criterion optimization problem of maximizing detection and minimizing cost, and thus supports sensitivity analysis over a wide range of budget and detection requirements. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Endre Boros & Noam Goldberg & Paul Kantor & Jonathan Word, 2011. "Optimal sequential inspection policies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 89-119, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:187:y:2011:i:1:p:89-119:10.1007/s10479-010-0799-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-010-0799-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-010-0799-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-010-0799-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prabhakant Sinha & Andris A. Zoltners, 1979. "The Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 503-515, June.
    2. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2008. "Port-of-entry safety via the reliability optimization of container inspection strategy through an evolutionary approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1698-1709.
    3. George B. Dantzig, 1957. "Discrete-Variable Extremum Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 266-288, April.
    4. Pisinger, David, 1995. "A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 394-410, June.
    5. Eitan Zemel, 1980. "The Linear Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1412-1423, December.
    6. Michael Maschler, 1966. "A price leadership method for solving the inspector's non‐constant‐sum game," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 11-33, March.
    7. E. Boros & L. Fedzhora & P. B. Kantor & K. Saeger & P. Stroud, 2009. "A large‐scale linear programming model for finding optimal container inspection strategies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(5), pages 404-420, August.
    8. Elam, Joyce & Klingman, Darwin & Mulvey, John, 1979. "An evaluation of mathematical programming and minicomputers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 30-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dreiding, Rebecca A. & McLay, Laura A., 2013. "An integrated model for screening cargo containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 181-189.
    2. McLay, Laura A. & Dreiding, Rebecca, 2012. "Multilevel, threshold-based policies for cargo container security screening systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 522-529.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tue R. L. Christensen & Kim Allan Andersen & Andreas Klose, 2013. "Solving the Single-Sink, Fixed-Charge, Multiple-Choice Transportation Problem by Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 428-438, August.
    2. Pisinger, David, 1995. "A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 394-410, June.
    3. Abdelkader Sbihi, 2007. "A best first search exact algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 337-351, May.
    4. Sbihi, Abdelkader, 2010. "A cooperative local search-based algorithm for the Multiple-Scenario Max-Min Knapsack Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 339-346, April.
    5. Bagchi, Ansuman & Bhattacharyya, Nalinaksha & Chakravarti, Nilotpal, 1996. "LP relaxation of the two dimensional knapsack problem with box and GUB constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 609-617, March.
    6. Wilbaut, Christophe & Todosijevic, Raca & Hanafi, Saïd & Fréville, Arnaud, 2023. "Heuristic and exact reduction procedures to solve the discounted 0–1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 901-911.
    7. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Hassoun, Michael, 2020. "On the importance of variability when managing metrology capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 267-276.
    8. Michel, S. & Perrot, N. & Vanderbeck, F., 2009. "Knapsack problems with setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 909-918, August.
    9. Tsesmetzis, Dimitrios & Roussaki, Ioanna & Sykas, Efstathios, 2008. "QoS-aware service evaluation and selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1101-1112, December.
    10. Wishon, Christopher & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2016. "Robust efficiency measures for linear knapsack problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 398-409.
    11. Higgins Michael J. & Rivest Ronald L. & Stark Philip B., 2011. "Sharper p-Values for Stratified Election Audits," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-37, October.
    12. Vijay Aggarwal & Narsingh Deo & Dilip Sarkar, 1992. "The knapsack problem with disjoint multiple‐choice constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 213-227, March.
    13. Ewa M. Bednarczuk & Janusz Miroforidis & Przemysław Pyzel, 2018. "A multi-criteria approach to approximate solution of multiple-choice knapsack problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 889-910, July.
    14. Pisinger, David, 2001. "Budgeting with bounded multiple-choice constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 471-480, March.
    15. Zhong, Tao & Young, Rhonda, 2010. "Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: Example of planning choice in transportation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 128-137, May.
    16. Walter, Rico & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2021. "SALSA: Combining branch-and-bound with dynamic programming to smoothen workloads in simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 857-873.
    17. Degraeve, Z. & Jans, R.F., 2003. "Improved Lower Bounds For The Capacitated Lot Sizing Problem With Set Up Times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-026-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Mhand Hifi & Slim Sadfi & Abdelkader Sbihi, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Post-Print halshs-03322716, HAL.
    19. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2008. "A versatile algorithm for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 39-56, January.
    20. Edward Y H Lin & Chung-Min Wu, 2004. "The multiple-choice multi-period knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 187-197, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:187:y:2011:i:1:p:89-119:10.1007/s10479-010-0799-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.