IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/alstar/v105y2021i2d10.1007_s10182-021-00400-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marginalized random-effects models for clustered binomial data through innovative link functions

Author

Listed:
  • Iraj Kazemi

    (University of Isfahan)

  • Fatemeh Hassanzadeh

    (University of Isfahan
    University of Khansar)

Abstract

Random-effects models are frequently used to analyze clustered binomial data. The direct computation of the marginal mean response, when integrated over the distribution of random effects, is challenging due to taking nonclosed-form expressions of the marginal link function. This paper extends the marginalized modeling methodology using innovative link functions, where the marginal mean response is modeled in terms of covariates and random effects. To derive the explicit closed-form representation of both marginal and conditional means, the regression structure is designed through an original strategy to introduce particular random-effects distributions. It will consequently allow for a reasonable interpretation of covariate effects. A Bayesian approach is employed to make the statistical inference by implementing the Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme. We conducted simulation studies to show the usefulness of our methodology. Two real-life data sets, taken from the teratology and respiratory studies, have been analyzed for illustration. The findings confirm that our new modeling methodology offers convenient settings for analyzing binomial responses in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Iraj Kazemi & Fatemeh Hassanzadeh, 2021. "Marginalized random-effects models for clustered binomial data through innovative link functions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(2), pages 197-228, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:alstar:v:105:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10182-021-00400-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10182-021-00400-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10182-021-00400-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10182-021-00400-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sungduk Kim & Ming-Hui Chen & Dipak K. Dey, 2008. "Flexible generalized t-link models for binary response data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(1), pages 93-106.
    2. Michael G. Kenward & Geert Molenberghs, 2016. "A taxonomy of mixing and outcome distributions based on conjugacy and bridging," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 1953-1968, April.
    3. Zengri Wang, 2003. "Matching conditional and marginal shapes in binary random intercept models using a bridge distribution function," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 765-775, December.
    4. Robert M. Dorazio & J. Andrew Royle, 2003. "Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 351-364, June.
    5. Iddi, Samuel & Molenberghs, Geert, 2012. "A combined overdispersed and marginalized multilevel model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1944-1951.
    6. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.
    7. Louise Marquart & Michele Haynes, 2019. "Misspecification of multimodal random‐effect distributions in logistic mixed models for panel survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(1), pages 305-321, January.
    8. Patrick J. Heagerty, 1999. "Marginally Specified Logistic-Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 688-698, September.
    9. Hinde, John & Demetrio, Clarice G. B., 1998. "Overdispersion: Models and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 151-170, April.
    10. Molenberghs, Geert & Verbeke, Geert & Iddi, Samuel & Demétrio, Clarice G.B., 2012. "A combined beta and normal random-effects model for repeated, overdispersed binary and binomial data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 94-109.
    11. Russell B. Millar, 2009. "Comparison of Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Overdispersed Count Data using DIC and Bayes' Factors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 962-969, September.
    12. Koenker, Roger & Yoon, Jungmo, 2009. "Parametric links for binary choice models: A Fisherian-Bayesian colloquy," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 120-130, October.
    13. Zengri Wang & Thomas A. Louis, 2004. "Marginalized Binary Mixed-Effects Models with Covariate-Dependent Random Effects and Likelihood Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 884-891, December.
    14. Donald Hedeker & Stephen H. C. du Toit & Hakan Demirtas & Robert D. Gibbons, 2018. "A note on marginalization of regression parameters from mixed models of binary outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 354-361, March.
    15. Laura Boehm & Brian J. Reich & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2013. "Bridging Conditional and Marginal Inference for Spatially Referenced Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 545-554, June.
    16. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    17. Tony Vangeneugden & Geert Molenberghs & Geert Verbeke & Clarice G.B. Demétrio, 2014. "Marginal Correlation from Logit- and Probit-Beta-Normal Models for Hierarchical Binary Data," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(19), pages 4164-4178, October.
    18. Bruce J. Swihart & Brian S. Caffo & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2014. "A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 275-295, August.
    19. Xiaoyun Li & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Stuart Lipsitz & Debajyoti Sinha, 2011. "Likelihood Methods for Binary Responses of Present Components in a Cluster," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 629-635, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Boehm & Brian J. Reich & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2013. "Bridging Conditional and Marginal Inference for Spatially Referenced Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 545-554, June.
    2. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.
    3. Iddi, Samuel & Molenberghs, Geert, 2012. "A combined overdispersed and marginalized multilevel model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1944-1951.
    4. Calabrese, Raffaella & Crook, Jonathan, 2020. "Spatial contagion in mortgage defaults: A spatial dynamic survival model with time and space varying coefficients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 749-761.
    5. Bruce J. Swihart & Brian S. Caffo & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2014. "A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 275-295, August.
    6. Oludare Ariyo & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke & Adrian Quintero, 2022. "Bayesian Model Selection for Longitudinal Count Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 516-547, November.
    7. Brathwaite, Timothy & Walker, Joan L., 2018. "Asymmetric, closed-form, finite-parameter models of multinomial choice," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 78-112.
    8. Iddi Samuel & Nwoko Esther O., 2017. "Effect of covariate misspecifications in the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 111-120, June.
    9. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.
    10. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2007. "Marginalized Models for Moderate to Long Series of Longitudinal Binary Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 322-331, June.
    11. Brajendra C. Sutradhar, 2022. "Fixed versus Mixed Effects Based Marginal Models for Clustered Correlated Binary Data: an Overview on Advances and Challenges," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 259-302, May.
    12. Caffo, Brian & An, Ming-Wen & Rohde, Charles, 2007. "Flexible random intercept models for binary outcomes using mixtures of normals," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5220-5235, July.
    13. Kathryn M. Irvine & T. J. Rodhouse & Ilai N. Keren, 2016. "Extending Ordinal Regression with a Latent Zero-Augmented Beta Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 619-640, December.
    14. Li, Yong & Yu, Jun & Zeng, Tao, 2018. "Integrated Deviance Information Criterion for Latent Variable Models," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 6-2018, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    15. Kyu Ha Lee & Virginie Rondeau & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "Accelerated failure time models for semi‐competing risks data in the presence of complex censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1401-1412, December.
    16. Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Antonio Canale, 2016. "Non-parametric spatial models for clustered ordered periodontal data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(4), pages 619-640, August.
    17. Victor De Oliveira, 2017. "Geostatistical Binary Data: Models, Properties And Connections," Working Papers 0151mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    18. Hui, Francis K.C., 2017. "Model-based simultaneous clustering and ordination of multivariate abundance data in ecology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Dandan Liu & John D. Kalbfleisch & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2011. "A Positive Stable Frailty Model for Clustered Failure Time Data with Covariate-Dependent Frailty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 8-17, March.
    20. Aregay, Mehreteab & Shkedy, Ziv & Molenberghs, Geert, 2013. "A hierarchical Bayesian approach for the analysis of longitudinal count data with overdispersion: A simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 233-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:alstar:v:105:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10182-021-00400-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.