IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sankhb/v84y2022i2d10.1007_s13571-021-00268-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Model Selection for Longitudinal Count Data

Author

Listed:
  • Oludare Ariyo

    (Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat)
    Federal University of Agriculture)

  • Emmanuel Lesaffre

    (Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat))

  • Geert Verbeke

    (Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat))

  • Adrian Quintero

    (Icfes - Colombian Institute for Educational Evaluation)

Abstract

We explore the performance of three popular model-selection criteria for generalised linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs) for longitudinal count data (LCD). We focus on evaluating the conditional criteria (given the random effects) versus the marginal criteria (averaging over the random effects) in selecting the appropriate data-generating model. We advocate the use of marginal criteria, since Bayesian statisticians often use the conditional criteria despite previous warnings. We discuss how to compute the marginal criteria for LCD by a replication method and importance sampling algorithm. Besides, we show via simulations to what extent we err when using the conditional criteria instead of the marginal criteria. To promote the usage of the marginal criteria, we developed an R function that computes the marginal criteria for longitudinal models based on samples from the posterior distribution. Finally, we illustrate the advantages of the marginal criteria on a well-known data set of patients who have epilepsy.

Suggested Citation

  • Oludare Ariyo & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke & Adrian Quintero, 2022. "Bayesian Model Selection for Longitudinal Count Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 516-547, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sankhb:v:84:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13571-021-00268-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13571-021-00268-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13571-021-00268-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13571-021-00268-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Joshua C.C. & Grant, Angelia L., 2016. "Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 847-859.
    2. Russell B. Millar, 2009. "Comparison of Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Overdispersed Count Data using DIC and Bayes' Factors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 962-969, September.
    3. Håvard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392, April.
    4. N. E. Breslow, 1984. "Extra‐Poisson Variation in Log‐Linear Models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 33(1), pages 38-44, March.
    5. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    6. Joshua C. C. Chan & Angelia L. Grant, 2016. "On the Observed-Data Deviance Information Criterion for Volatility Modeling," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 772-802.
    7. Oludare Ariyo & Adrian Quintero & Johanna Muñoz & Geert Verbeke & Emmanuel Lesaffre, 2020. "Bayesian model selection in linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 890-913, April.
    8. Aregay, Mehreteab & Shkedy, Ziv & Molenberghs, Geert, 2013. "A hierarchical Bayesian approach for the analysis of longitudinal count data with overdispersion: A simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 233-245.
    9. Yong Li & Zeng Tao & Jun Yu, "undated". "Robust Deviance Information Criterion for Latent Variable Models," Working Papers CoFie-04-2012, Singapore Management University, Sim Kee Boon Institute for Financial Economics.
    10. Koehler, Elizabeth & Brown, Elizabeth & Haneuse, Sebastien J.-P. A., 2009. "On the Assessment of Monte Carlo Error in Simulation-Based Statistical Analyses," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(2), pages 155-162.
    11. Hinde, John & Demetrio, Clarice G. B., 1998. "Overdispersion: Models and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 151-170, April.
    12. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Linde, 2014. "The deviance information criterion: 12 years on," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(3), pages 485-493, June.
    13. Florin Vaida & Suzette Blanchard, 2005. "Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(2), pages 351-370, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yong & Yu, Jun & Zeng, Tao, 2018. "Integrated Deviance Information Criterion for Latent Variable Models," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 6-2018, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    2. Li, Yong & Yu, Jun & Zeng, Tao, 2020. "Deviance information criterion for latent variable models and misspecified models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 450-493.
    3. Joshua C.C. Chan & Angelia L. Grant, 2014. "Issues in Comparing Stochastic Volatility Models Using the Deviance Information Criterion," CAMA Working Papers 2014-51, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    4. Ye Yang & Osman Doğan & Süleyman Taşpınar, 2023. "Observed-data DIC for spatial panel data models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 1281-1314, March.
    5. Gong, Xiao-Li & Liu, Xi-Hua & Xiong, Xiong & Zhuang, Xin-Tian, 2018. "Modeling volatility dynamics using non-Gaussian stochastic volatility model based on band matrix routine," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 193-201.
    6. Mabel Morales-Otero & Vicente Núñez-Antón, 2021. "Comparing Bayesian Spatial Conditional Overdispersion and the Besag–York–Mollié Models: Application to Infant Mortality Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, January.
    7. Arnab Kumar Maity & Sanjib Basu & Santu Ghosh, 2021. "Bayesian criterion‐based variable selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 835-857, August.
    8. Joshua C. C. Chan & Eric Eisenstat, 2018. "Bayesian model comparison for time‐varying parameter VARs with stochastic volatility," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 509-532, June.
    9. Oludare Ariyo & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke & Martijn Huisman & Martijn Heymans & Jos Twisk, 2022. "Bayesian model selection for multilevel mediation models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(2), pages 219-235, May.
    10. Iraj Kazemi & Fatemeh Hassanzadeh, 2021. "Marginalized random-effects models for clustered binomial data through innovative link functions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(2), pages 197-228, June.
    11. Dimitris Korobilis & Kenichi Shimizu, 2022. "Bayesian Approaches to Shrinkage and Sparse Estimation," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 11(4), pages 230-354, June.
    12. Bresson Georges & Chaturvedi Anoop & Rahman Mohammad Arshad & Shalabh, 2021. "Seemingly unrelated regression with measurement error: estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo and mean field variational Bayes approximation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 75-97, May.
    13. R. B. Millar & S. McKechnie, 2014. "A one-step-ahead pseudo-DIC for comparison of Bayesian state-space models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 972-980, December.
    14. Chan, Joshua C.C. & Grant, Angelia L., 2016. "Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 847-859.
    15. Chan, Joshua C.C. & Eisenstat, Eric & Koop, Gary, 2016. "Large Bayesian VARMAs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 374-390.
    16. Mayer Alvo & Jingrui Mu, 2023. "COVID-19 Data Analysis Using Bayesian Models and Nonparametric Geostatistical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Chen, Liyuan & Zerilli, Paola & Baum, Christopher F., 2019. "Leverage effects and stochastic volatility in spot oil returns: A Bayesian approach with VaR and CVaR applications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 111-129.
    18. Jeonghwan Kim & Woojoo Lee, 2019. "On testing the hidden heterogeneity in negative binomial regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 457-470, May.
    19. Daniela Silva & Raquel Menezes & Ana Moreno & Ana Teles-Machado & Susana Garrido, 2024. "Environmental Effects on the Spatiotemporal Variability of Sardine Distribution Along the Portuguese Continental Coast," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 553-575, September.
    20. David Jiménez-Hernández & Víctor González-Calatayud & Ana Torres-Soto & Asunción Martínez Mayoral & Javier Morales, 2020. "Digital Competence of Future Secondary School Teachers: Differences According to Gender, Age, and Branch of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sankhb:v:84:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13571-021-00268-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.