IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/alstar/v101y2017i4d10.1007_s10182-017-0302-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Toby A. Patterson

    (CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere)

  • Alison Parton

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Roland Langrock

    (Bielefeld University)

  • Paul G. Blackwell

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Len Thomas

    (University of St Andrews)

  • Ruth King

    (University of Edinburgh)

Abstract

With the influx of complex and detailed tracking data gathered from electronic tracking devices, the analysis of animal movement data has recently emerged as a cottage industry among biostatisticians. New approaches of ever greater complexity are continue to be added to the literature. In this paper, we review what we believe to be some of the most popular and most useful classes of statistical models used to analyse individual animal movement data. Specifically, we consider discrete-time hidden Markov models, more general state-space models and diffusion processes. We argue that these models should be core components in the toolbox for quantitative researchers working on stochastic modelling of individual animal movement. The paper concludes by offering some general observations on the direction of statistical analysis of animal movement. There is a trend in movement ecology towards what are arguably overly complex modelling approaches which are inaccessible to ecologists, unwieldy with large data sets or not based on mainstream statistical practice. Additionally, some analysis methods developed within the ecological community ignore fundamental properties of movement data, potentially leading to misleading conclusions about animal movement. Corresponding approaches, e.g. based on Lévy walk-type models, continue to be popular despite having been largely discredited. We contend that there is a need for an appropriate balance between the extremes of either being overly complex or being overly simplistic, whereby the discipline relies on models of intermediate complexity that are usable by general ecologists, but grounded in well-developed statistical practice and efficient to fit to large data sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Toby A. Patterson & Alison Parton & Roland Langrock & Paul G. Blackwell & Len Thomas & Ruth King, 2017. "Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 399-438, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:alstar:v:101:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10182-017-0302-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James C. Russell & Ephraim M. Hanks & Murali Haran, 2016. "Dynamic Models of Animal Movement with Spatial Point Process Interactions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 22-40, March.
    2. G. M. Viswanathan & Sergey V. Buldyrev & Shlomo Havlin & M. G. E. da Luz & E. P. Raposo & H. Eugene Stanley, 1999. "Optimizing the success of random searches," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6756), pages 911-914, October.
    3. P. G. Blackwell, 2003. "Bayesian inference for Markov processes with diffusion and discrete components," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(3), pages 613-627, September.
    4. Harvey,Andrew C., 1991. "Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521405737, September.
    5. Andrew M Edwards & Mervyn P Freeman & Greg A Breed & Ian D Jonsen, 2012. "Incorrect Likelihood Methods Were Used to Infer Scaling Laws of Marine Predator Search Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Roman Holenstein, 2010. "Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 269-342, June.
    7. David W. Sims & Emily J. Southall & Nicolas E. Humphries & Graeme C. Hays & Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Jonathan W. Pitchford & Alex James & Mohammed Z. Ahmed & Andrew S. Brierley & Mark A. Hindell & David, 2008. "Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7182), pages 1098-1102, February.
    8. Jingjing Zhang & Kathleen M O’Reilly & George L W Perry & Graeme A Taylor & Todd E Dennis, 2015. "Extending the Functionality of Behavioural Change-Point Analysis with k-Means Clustering: A Case Study with the Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Ann E. McKellar & Roland Langrock & Jeffrey R. Walters & Dylan C. Kesler, 2015. "Using mixed hidden Markov models to examine behavioral states in a cooperatively breeding bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 148-157.
    10. Harris, Keith J. & Blackwell, Paul G., 2013. "Flexible continuous-time modelling for heterogeneous animal movement," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 29-37.
    11. Iain L. MacDonald, 2014. "Numerical Maximisation of Likelihood: A Neglected Alternative to EM?," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 296-308, August.
    12. Mu Niu & Paul G. Blackwell & Anna Skarin, 2016. "Modeling interdependent animal movement in continuous time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 315-324, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diaz, Stephanie G. & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Gaines, Michael S. & Purdon, Andrew & Mole, Michael A. & van Aarde, Rudi J., 2021. "Development and validation of a spatially-explicit agent-based model for space utilization by African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) based on determinants of movement," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 447(C).
    2. Nasroallah Abdelaziz & Elkimakh Karima, 2017. "HMM with emission process resulting from a special combination of independent Markovian emissions," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(4), pages 287-306, December.
    3. Toryn L. J. Schafer & Christopher K. Wikle & Jay A. VonBank & Bart M. Ballard & Mitch D. Weegman, 2020. "A Bayesian Markov Model with Pólya-Gamma Sampling for Estimating Individual Behavior Transition Probabilities from Accelerometer Classifications," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 365-382, September.
    4. Mevin B. Hooten & Ruth King & Roland Langrock, 2017. "Guest Editor’s Introduction to the Special Issue on “Animal Movement Modeling”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 224-231, September.
    5. Ethan Lawler & Kim Whoriskey & William H. Aeberhard & Chris Field & Joanna Mills Flemming, 2019. "The Conditionally Autoregressive Hidden Markov Model (CarHMM): Inferring Behavioural States from Animal Tracking Data Exhibiting Conditional Autocorrelation," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(4), pages 651-668, December.
    6. Michael A. Spence & Evalyne W. Muiruri & David L. Maxwell & Scott Davis & Dave Sheahan, 2021. "The application of continuous‐time Markov chain models in the analysis of choice flume experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1103-1123, August.
    7. Antonello Maruotti & Antonio Punzo, 2021. "Initialization of Hidden Markov and Semi‐Markov Models: A Critical Evaluation of Several Strategies," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 447-480, December.
    8. Panagiotis Besbeas & Byron J. T. Morgan, 2017. "Variance estimation for integrated population models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 439-460, October.
    9. Roland Langrock & David L. Borchers, 2017. "Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on “Ecological Statistics”," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 345-347, October.
    10. Joy, Ruth & Schick, Robert S. & Dowd, Michael & Margolina, Tetyana & Joseph, John E. & Thomas, Len, 2022. "A fine-scale marine mammal movement model for assessing long-term aggregate noise exposure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svetlana V. Tishkovskaya & Paul G. Blackwell, 2021. "Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    2. Michael A. Spence & Evalyne W. Muiruri & David L. Maxwell & Scott Davis & Dave Sheahan, 2021. "The application of continuous‐time Markov chain models in the analysis of choice flume experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1103-1123, August.
    3. Mu Niu & Fay Frost & Jordan E. Milner & Anna Skarin & Paul G. Blackwell, 2022. "Modelling group movement with behaviour switching in continuous time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 286-299, March.
    4. Boschetti, Fabio & Vanderklift, Mathew A., 2015. "How the movement characteristics of large marine predators influence estimates of their abundance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 223-236.
    5. A. Parton & P. G. Blackwell, 2017. "Bayesian Inference for Multistate ‘Step and Turn’ Animal Movement in Continuous Time," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 373-392, September.
    6. Ferreira, A.S. & Raposo, E.P. & Viswanathan, G.M. & da Luz, M.G.E., 2012. "The influence of the environment on Lévy random search efficiency: Fractality and memory effects," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3234-3246.
    7. Marina E Wosniack & Marcos C Santos & Ernesto P Raposo & Gandhi M Viswanathan & Marcos G E da Luz, 2017. "The evolutionary origins of Lévy walk foraging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Pauline Formaglio & Marina E. Wosniack & Raphael M. Tromer & Jaderson G. Polli & Yuri B. Matos & Hang Zhong & Ernesto P. Raposo & Marcos G. E. Luz & Rogerio Amino, 2023. "Plasmodium sporozoite search strategy to locate hotspots of blood vessel invasion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. LaScala-Gruenewald, Diana E. & Mehta, Rohan S. & Liu, Yu & Denny, Mark W., 2019. "Sensory perception plays a larger role in foraging efficiency than heavy-tailed movement strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 69-82.
    10. Toman, Kellan & Voulgarakis, Nikolaos K., 2022. "Stochastic pursuit-evasion curves for foraging dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    11. Danish A. Ahmed & Sergei V. Petrovskii & Paulo F. C. Tilles, 2018. "The “Lévy or Diffusion” Controversy: How Important Is the Movement Pattern in the Context of Trapping?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Nauta, Johannes & Simoens, Pieter & Khaluf, Yara, 2022. "Group size and resource fractality drive multimodal search strategies: A quantitative analysis on group foraging," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 590(C).
    13. E P Raposo & F Bartumeus & M G E da Luz & P J Ribeiro-Neto & T A Souza & G M Viswanathan, 2011. "How Landscape Heterogeneity Frames Optimal Diffusivity in Searching Processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-8, November.
    14. Rutger Jan Lange, 2020. "Bellman filtering for state-space models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-052/III, Tinbergen Institute, revised 19 May 2021.
    15. Sepideh Bazazi & Frederic Bartumeus & Joseph J Hale & Iain D Couzin, 2012. "Intermittent Motion in Desert Locusts: Behavioural Complexity in Simple Environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    16. Elmar Mertens & James M. Nason, 2020. "Inflation and professional forecast dynamics: An evaluation of stickiness, persistence, and volatility," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1485-1520, November.
    17. Masato S Abe & Masakazu Shimada, 2015. "Lévy Walks Suboptimal under Predation Risk," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Nalan Basturk & Cem Cakmakli & S. Pinar Ceyhan & Herman K. van Dijk, 2014. "On the Rise of Bayesian Econometrics after Cowles Foundation Monographs 10, 14," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-085/III, Tinbergen Institute, revised 04 Sep 2014.
    19. Danish A Ahmed & Ali R Ansari & Mudassar Imran & Kamal Dingle & Michael B Bonsall, 2021. "Mechanistic modelling of COVID-19 and the impact of lockdowns on a short-time scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Zaineb L. Boulil & John W. Durban & Holly Fearnbach & Trevor W. Joyce & Samantha G. M. Leander & Henry R. Scharf, 2023. "Detecting Changes in Dynamic Social Networks Using Multiply-Labeled Movement Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(2), pages 243-259, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:alstar:v:101:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10182-017-0302-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.