IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i4p998-1020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Young Workers Perceive Job Insecurity? Legitimising Frames for Precarious Work in England and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Vera Trappmann

    (Leeds University Business School, UK)

  • Charles Umney

    (Leeds University Business School, UK)

  • Christopher J McLachlan

    (Queen Mary University of London, UK)

  • Alexandra Seehaus

    (Leeds University Business School, UK)

  • Laura Cartwright

    (University of Leeds, UK)

Abstract

This article examines the legitimising frames young workers in England and Germany apply to precarious work. Through 63 qualitative biographical interviews, the article shows that most young precarious workers saw work insecurity as an unavoidable fact of life whose legitimacy could not realistically be challenged. Four frames are identified that led to precarious work being seen as legitimate: precarious work as a driver of entrepreneurialism; as inevitable due to repeated exposure; as a stage within the life course; and as the price paid for the pursuit of autonomy and meaningful work. The article advances the literature on precarious workers’ subjectivity by identifying the frames through which it is legitimised, and by underlining the importance of frames that are currently underexamined. The prevalence of the pursuit of meaningful, non-alienating work as a frame is a particularly striking finding.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera Trappmann & Charles Umney & Christopher J McLachlan & Alexandra Seehaus & Laura Cartwright, 2024. "How Do Young Workers Perceive Job Insecurity? Legitimising Frames for Precarious Work in England and Germany," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 998-1020, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:4:p:998-1020
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231187821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231187821
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231187821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:4:p:998-1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.