IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v29y2015i2p331-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intersectionality: are we taking enough notice in the field of work and employment relations?

Author

Listed:
  • Anne McBride

    (University of Manchester, UK)

  • Gail Hebson

    (University of Manchester, UK)

  • Jane Holgate

    (University of Leeds, UK)

Abstract

Intersectional analysis has been developing since its emergence from critical race feminism in the 1980s when it was used to conceptualize the inter-relationship of race and gender and, particularly, the experiences of discrimination and marginalization of black women in employment. While its contribution has been much debated within sociological and gender specific journals, its use still remains relatively limited within studies of work and employment relations. It is argued here that this field of study would benefit from greater engagement with and understanding of an intersectional approach to both the design and interpretation of research. Two lines of reasoning are put forward for this contention: firstly, that the intersectional approach contains an important caution against over-generalization that has been obscured; secondly, that separating the challenge for all academics to be more intersectionally sensitive from the methodological challenges of taking an intersectional approach brings the significance of intersectionality into sharper relief.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne McBride & Gail Hebson & Jane Holgate, 2015. "Intersectionality: are we taking enough notice in the field of work and employment relations?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(2), pages 331-341, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:29:y:2015:i:2:p:331-341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/29/2/331.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fitzsimmons, Stacey R. & Baggs, Jen & Brannen, Mary Yoko, 2020. "Intersectional arithmetic: How gender, race and mother tongue combine to impact immigrants’ work outcomes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    2. Aviad E. Raz & Gavan Tzruya, 2018. "Doing gender in segregated and assimilative organizations: Ultra†Orthodox Jewish women in the Israeli high†tech labour market," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 361-378, July.
    3. Louise Thornthwaite & Nikola Balnave & Alison Barnes, 2018. "Unions and social media: Prospects for gender inclusion," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 401-417, July.
    4. Jenny Rodriguez & Evangelina Holvino & Joyce K. Fletcher & Stella M. Nkomo & Mayra Ruiz Castro & Evangelina Holvino, 2016. "Applying Intersectionality in Organizations: Inequality Markers, Cultural Scripts and Advancement Practices in a Professional Service Firm," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 328-347, May.
    5. Gabriella Alberti & Davide Però, 2018. "Migrating Industrial Relations: Migrant Workers’ Initiative Within and Outside Trade Unions," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 693-715, December.
    6. Jenny Rodriguez & Evangelina Holvino & Joyce K. Fletcher & Stella M. Nkomo & Jenny K. Rodriguez & Evangelina Holvino & Joyce K. Fletcher & Stella M. Nkomo, 2016. "The Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go From Here?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 201-222, May.
    7. Mooney, Shelagh, 2018. "Illuminating intersectionality for tourism researchers," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 175-176.
    8. Shelagh Mooney & Irene Ryan & Candice Harris, 2017. "The Intersections of Gender with Age and Ethnicity in Hotel Careers: Still the Same Old Privileges?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 360-375, July.
    9. Isabel Távora & Paula Rodríguez‐Modroño, 2018. "The impact of the crisis and austerity on low educated working women: The cases of Spain and Portugal," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 621-636, November.
    10. Guha Majumdar, Mrittunjoy, 2018. "Identity, Intersectionality and Welfare," SocArXiv etfqm, Center for Open Science.
    11. Baumann, Chris & Timming, Andrew R. & Gollan, Paul J., 2016. "Taboo tattoos? A study of the gendered effects of body art on consumers' attitudes toward visibly tattooed front line staff," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 31-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:29:y:2015:i:2:p:331-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.