IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v25y2011i2p202-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The state and the union learning agenda in Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Rainbird

    (University of Birmingham, UKÂ Â h.rainbird@bham.ac.uk)

  • Mark Stuart

    (University of Leeds, UKÂ)

Abstract

The emergence of the union learning agenda under the New Labour variant of neo-liberalism has produced a debate on the appropriateness of union involvement in this arena of activity. The incorporation thesis argues that unions merely implement policy over which they have had little influence. The critical engagement thesis suggests that there may be union gains, but these are emergent. The article reviews key debates and considers the key outcomes of the union learning representative initiative. It argues that models of union learning are shaped by union character, structure and organizational priorities and afford space for unions to develop their representative and regulatory capacity. New forms of activism, formal and informal representative roles offer avenues for exploring the changing nature of industrial relations and workplace representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Rainbird & Mark Stuart, 2011. "The state and the union learning agenda in Britain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 202-217, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:25:y:2011:i:2:p:202-217
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017011398893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017011398893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017011398893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Cassell & Bill Lee, 2009. "Trade unions learning representatives: progressing partnership?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 213-230, June.
    2. Anne Munro & Helen Rainbird, 2000. "The New Unionism and the New Bargaining Agenda: UNISON–Employer Partnerships on Workplace Learning in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 223-240, June.
    3. Kim Hoque & Nicolas Bacon, 2008. "Trade Unions, Union Learning Representatives and Employer‐Provided Training in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 702-731, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balsmeier, Benjamin, 2017. "Unions, collective relations laws and R&D investment in emerging and developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 292-304.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Wallis & Mark Stuart & Ian Greenwood, 2005. "‘Learners of the workplace unite!’," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(2), pages 283-304, June.
    2. Kim Hoque & Nicolas Bacon, 2011. "Assessing the impact of Union Learning Representatives on training: evidence from a matched sample of ULRs and managers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 218-233, June.
    3. Catherine Cassell & Bill Lee, 2009. "Trade unions learning representatives: progressing partnership?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 213-230, June.
    4. Carmen GARCÍA OLAVERRI & Emilio HUERTA, 2011. "Trade union influence in Spanish manufacturing firms," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 150(3-4), pages 279-296, December.
    5. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Hande Inanc & Nick Jewson, 2016. "The Declining Volume of Workers’ Training in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 422-448, June.
    6. Fabio Berton & Anna Carreri & Francesco Devicienti & Andrea Ricci, 2023. "The collective voice of unions and workplace training in Italy: New insights from mixed methods," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 595-622, September.
    7. Damian Grimshaw & Jo Cartwright & Arjan Keizer & Jill Rubery, 2019. "Market Exposure and the Labour Process: The Contradictory Dynamics in Managing Subcontracted Services Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(1), pages 76-95, February.
    8. Sang-Woo Lee, 2005. "The Transformation of the British Business Culture under the Globalizing Environment," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 8(2), pages 203-222, June.
    9. Uschi Backes-Gellner & Yvonne Oswald & Simone Tuor Sartore, 2014. "Part-Time Employment—Boon to Women but Bane to Men? New Insights on Employer-Provided Training," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(4), pages 463-481, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:25:y:2011:i:2:p:202-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.