IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v28y2024i4p523-528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leadership Style and Work Engagement: A Comparison of Private and Public Sector Firms in India

Author

Listed:
  • Jain Mathew
  • Kohila Rajam
  • Sridevi Nair

Abstract

Post-privatization, public sector organizations were encouraged to borrow and learn from private sector firms. The popular belief was that the human resource practices followed by private sector organizations were far superior and more effective than those of the public sector organizations. However, this claim lacks empirical proof. This study adds to this body of knowledge by comparing the level of work engagement in private and public sector firms of India. Given that the leadership is crucial in setting the tone of an organization, the study also analyses the dominant leadership styles and their relationship to the levels of work engagement. The study is descriptive in nature and utilizes a structured questionnaire to collect data. Individuals currently employed in Indian public and private sector firms, in managerial roles, were invited to record their responses. The final sample consisted of 240 employees, with equal representation from both sectors. The collected data was then analysed using SPSS. The findings suggested that the dominant leadership styles were not significantly different in public and private sector organizations. Private sector employees were found to be more engaged and the leadership style appeared to be significantly related to the levels of engagement in public sector firms only.

Suggested Citation

  • Jain Mathew & Kohila Rajam & Sridevi Nair, 2024. "Leadership Style and Work Engagement: A Comparison of Private and Public Sector Firms in India," Vision, , vol. 28(4), pages 523-528, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:523-528
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629211052642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629211052642
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629211052642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Boyne & Julian Gould-Williams & Jennifer Law & Richard Walker, 1999. "Markets, Bureaucracy and Public Management: Competitive Tendering and Best Value in Local Government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 23-29, October.
    2. Schuler, Randall S., 2000. "The internationalization of human resource management," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 239-260.
    3. George A. Boyne, 2002. "Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 97-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2014. "Yes, no, maybe: the ambiguous relationships between State-owned enterprises and States," Departmental Working Papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    2. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    3. Leask, Anna, 2010. "Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-166.
    4. Thi Cam Tu Luong & Ann Jorissen & Ine Paeleman, 2019. "Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-35, August.
    5. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    6. Giuliana Bronzoni Liberato & Marcelo Sanches Pagliarussi, 2008. "Disclosure de estratégia em relatórios anuais: a influência das dimensões culturais, do sistema legal e da governança corporativa em empresas de quatro países," Fucape Working Papers 03, Fucape Business School.
    7. Vahid Javidroozi & Hanifa Shah & Gerald Feldman, 2022. "Facilitating Smart City Development through Adaption of the Learnings from Enterprise Systems Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Jan-Erik Johanson & Elias Pekkola & Päivi Husman, 2017. "Government Programme as a Strategy—The Finnish Experience," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Halit Karaxha, 2019. "The Importance of Implementing Changes in Organizations," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(72), pages 25-36, June.
    10. Waring, Justin & Bishop, Simon, 2012. "Going private: Clinicians’ experience of working in UK Independent Sector Treatment Centres," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 172-178.
    11. Marian W. Moszoro & Pablo T. Spiller, 2018. "Implications of Third Parties for Contract Design," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 45(1), pages 5-16, March.
    12. Or Shkoler & Aharon Tziner, 2020. "Leadership Styles as Predictors of Work Attitudes: A Moderated–Mediation Link," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 164-164, February.
    13. Medvedska Oksana & Berzisa Solvita, 2015. "Selection of Software Development Project Lifecycle Model in Government Institution," Information Technology and Management Science, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 5-11, December.
    14. Stavrou, Eleni T. & Charalambous, Christakis & Spiliotis, Stelios, 2007. "Human resource management and performance: A neural network analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 453-467, August.
    15. Sharma, Piyush & Cheng, Louis T.W. & Leung, T.Y., 2020. "Impact of political connections on Chinese export firms' performance – Lessons for other emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 24-34.
    16. Cristina M. Campos-Alba & Emilio J. De la Higuera-Molina & Gemma Pérez-López & José L. Zafra-Gómez, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Public and Private Delivery Forms: An Application to the Waste Collection Service Using Order-M Data Panel Frontier Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    17. K. V. James & R. G. Priyadarshini, 2021. "Responsible Leadership: A New Paradigm for Organizational Sustainability," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(4), pages 452-470, November.
    18. Meenakshi Khanna & Vandana Maini, 2013. "A Study of Work Exhaustion in Frontline Bank Employees," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(1-2), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Anette Hallin & Tina Karrbom Gustavsson, 2009. "Managing death – corporate social responsibility and tragedy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 206-216, July.
    20. Nguyen, Tuyet-Mai & Viet Ngo, Liem & Paramita, Widya, 2022. "Turning lurkers into innovation agents: An interactionist perspective of self-determinant theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 822-835.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:523-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.