IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i6p1274-1289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encounters with difference in the subdivided house: The case of secondary suites in Vancouver

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Mendez

Abstract

Policies that encourage tenure mix as a strategy to help narrow socio-spatial distance between homeowner households and their renter counterparts have a long and controversial history in North American and European cities. Research that seeks to evaluate the merits of such policies has typically focused on the frequency of encounters between these two types of household, at the expense of the quality of this contact. Accessory apartments in subdivided houses (also known as secondary suites) provide a germane micro-scale environment to examine the content of interactions between homeowners and renters. Inspired by Gill Valentine’s work on ‘encounters with difference’ and using a series of interviews with secondary-suite homeowner-landlords and their tenants in the city of Vancouver, this article illustrates three types of encounters across tenure-based difference. These examples of conflictive, tolerant, and respectful encounter provide helpful material to reflect on the limitations of tenure mix as a macro-scale policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Mendez, 2018. "Encounters with difference in the subdivided house: The case of secondary suites in Vancouver," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1274-1289, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:6:p:1274-1289
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017708090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017708090
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017708090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Mendez & Noah Quastel, 2015. "Subterranean Commodification: Informal Housing and the Legalization of Basement Suites in Vancouver from 1928 to 2009," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1155-1171, November.
    2. Steven Flusty, 2001. "The Banality of Interdiction: Surveillance, Control and the Displacement of Diversity," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 658-664, September.
    3. Elena Sautkina & Lyndal Bond & Ade Kearns, 2012. "Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 748-782.
    4. Berrey, Ellen, 2015. "The Enigma of Diversity," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226246062, April.
    5. Deljana Iossifova, 2010. "Identity and Space on the Borderland between Old and New in Shanghai: a Case Study," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2010-039, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Iossifova, Deljana, 2010. "Identity and Space on the Borderland between Old and New in Shanghai: A Case Study," WIDER Working Paper Series 039, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Martine August, 2014. "Negotiating Social Mix in Toronto's First Public Housing Redevelopment: Power, Space and Social Control in Don Mount Court," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1160-1180, July.
    8. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226246239 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shauna Brail & Nishi Kumar, 2017. "Community leadership and engagement after the mix: The transformation of Toronto’s Regent Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3772-3788, December.
    2. Junxi Qian, 2015. "No right to the street: Motorcycle taxis, discourse production and the regulation of unruly mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2922-2947, November.
    3. Milena Doytcheva, 2021. "Diversity as Immigration Governmentality: Insights from France," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Bouwmeester, Josje & Gerber, Jean-David & Hartmann, Thomas & Ay, Deniz, 2023. "Non-compliance and non-enforcement: An unexpected outcome of flexible soft densification policy in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Jakub Galuszka, 2024. "BOATS AS HOUSING IN OXFORD, UK: Trajectories of Informality in a High‐Income Context," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 126-144, January.
    6. Clair, Matthew & Daniel, Caitlin & Lamont, Michèle, 2016. "Destigmatization and health: Cultural constructions and the long-term reduction of stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 223-232.
    7. Gary Bridge & Tim Butler & Patrick Le Galès, 2014. "Power Relations and Social Mix in Metropolitan Neighbourhoods in North America and Europe: Moving Beyond Gentrification?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1133-1141, July.
    8. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    9. Phil Hubbard, 2004. "Cleansing the Metropolis: Sex Work and the Politics of Zero Tolerance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(9), pages 1687-1702, August.
    10. Martine August, 2016. "Revitalisation gone wrong: Mixed-income public housing redevelopment in Toronto’s Don Mount Court," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3405-3422, December.
    11. Merav Kaddar, 2020. "Gentrifiers and attitudes towards agency: A new typology. Evidence from Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1243-1259, May.
    12. Craig Young & Martina Diep & Stephanie Drabble, 2006. "Living with Difference? The 'Cosmopolitan City' and Urban Reimaging in Manchester, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1687-1714, September.
    13. Tony Crook & Peter Bibby & Ed Ferrari & Sarah Monk & Connie Tang & Christine Whitehead, 2016. "New housing association development and its potential to reduce concentrations of deprivation: An English case study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3388-3404, December.
    14. Ade Kearns & Phil Mason, 2018. "Entering and leaving employment in deprived neighbourhoods undergoing area regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(5), pages 537-561, August.
    15. Federico Caprotti, 2019. "Spaces of visibility in the smart city: Flagship urban spaces and the smart urban imaginary," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2465-2479, September.
    16. Richard Lawder & David Walsh & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston, 2014. "Healthy Mixing? Investigating the Associations between Neighbourhood Housing Tenure Mix and Health Outcomes for Urban Residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 264-283, February.
    17. Anderson-Gough, Fiona & Edgley, Carla & Robson, Keith & Sharma, Nina, 2022. "Organizational responses to multiple logics: Diversity, identity and the professional service firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Julia Jansen-van Vuuren & Hibo Rijal & Nicole Bobbette & Rosemary Lysaght & Terry Krupa & Daniella Aguilar, 2024. "Exploring the Connection between Social Housing and Employment: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Peter Francis Harvey, 2023. "“Everyone Thinks They’re Special†: How Schools Teach Children Their Social Station," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(3), pages 493-521, June.
    20. Andrew Riely, 2020. "Gentrifiers, distinction, and social preservation: A case study in consumption on Mount Pleasant Street in Washington, DC," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2383-2401, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:6:p:1274-1289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.