IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v27y2012i6p748-782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Sautkina
  • Lyndal Bond
  • Ade Kearns

Abstract

Mixed tenure is a key feature of UK housing and regeneration policy. Following an earlier review-of-reviews pertaining to mixed tenure effects (Bond et al., 2011), this paper presents a systematic review of the UK evidence published between 1999 and 2005. The majority of the available evidence is cross-sectional, mostly derived from modest-quality case-study research across nearly 100 sites, supplemented by a very few secondary studies using national data. Six broad domains of outcomes have been investigated across 27 studies. Some positive impacts of mixed tenure were found in the social and residential domains, though notably without impacts on social capital. The evidence for mixed tenure effects in the environmental, safety and economic domains is very mixed. In the human capital domain of health and education, the evidence is sparse. A stronger theoretical base (including the assessment of causal mechanisms) is required to guide future research on mixed tenure effects, which should be longer term and longitudinal in nature, using comparison case studies and secondary data.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Sautkina & Lyndal Bond & Ade Kearns, 2012. "Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 748-782.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:27:y:2012:i:6:p:748-782
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2012.714461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2012.714461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2012.714461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shauna Brail & Nishi Kumar, 2017. "Community leadership and engagement after the mix: The transformation of Toronto’s Regent Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3772-3788, December.
    2. Richard Lawder & David Walsh & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston, 2014. "Healthy Mixing? Investigating the Associations between Neighbourhood Housing Tenure Mix and Health Outcomes for Urban Residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 264-283, February.
    3. Pablo Mendez, 2018. "Encounters with difference in the subdivided house: The case of secondary suites in Vancouver," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1274-1289, May.
    4. Tony Crook & Peter Bibby & Ed Ferrari & Sarah Monk & Connie Tang & Christine Whitehead, 2016. "New housing association development and its potential to reduce concentrations of deprivation: An English case study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3388-3404, December.
    5. Ade Kearns & Phil Mason, 2018. "Entering and leaving employment in deprived neighbourhoods undergoing area regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(5), pages 537-561, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:27:y:2012:i:6:p:748-782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.