IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i12p2383-2401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gentrifiers, distinction, and social preservation: A case study in consumption on Mount Pleasant Street in Washington, DC

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Riely

Abstract

Mount Pleasant, a neighbourhood of Washington, DC that has experienced several decades of residential gentrification (Gale, 1980; Modan, 2007; Williams, 1988), nonetheless possesses a commercial corridor where local stores far outnumber boutique retail and corporate chain outlets. Its situation challenges a critical strain within the commercial gentrification literature that emphasises the likelihood of retail displacement during the gentrification process and characterises gentrifier consumers as primarily interested in retail outlets that are familiar or carefully designed to suit their taste. This study investigates gentrifiers’ consumption practices in Mount Pleasant to ascertain how they differ from those of peers in neighbourhoods where gentrification has followed a more typical trajectory. Using theories of distinction (Bourdieu, 1984) and social preservation (Brown-Saracino, 2009), I argue that many local gentrifiers, contradictorily, seek to accrue cultural capital by consuming ‘authentic’ local culture and products while paying attention to the costs of turnover and displacement.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Riely, 2020. "Gentrifiers, distinction, and social preservation: A case study in consumption on Mount Pleasant Street in Washington, DC," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2383-2401, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:12:p:2383-2401
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019830895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019830895
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019830895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Bridge, 2001. "Estate Agents as Interpreters of Economic and Cultural Capital: The Gentrification Premium in the Sydney Housing Market," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 87-101, March.
    2. Berrey, Ellen, 2015. "The Enigma of Diversity," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226246062, December.
    3. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226246239 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Max Rousseau, 2009. "Re‐imaging the City Centre for the Middle Classes: Regeneration, Gentrification and Symbolic Policies in ‘Loser Cities’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 770-788, September.
    5. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    2. Nilsson, Isabelle & Delmelle, Elizabeth C., 2023. "Smart growth as a luxury amenity? Exploring the relationship between the marketing of smart growth characteristics and neighborhood racial and income change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Seth Schindler & Jonathan Silver, 2019. "Florida in the Global South: How Eurocentrism Obscures Global Urban Challenges—and What We Can Do about It," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 794-805, July.
    5. Milena Doytcheva, 2021. "Diversity as Immigration Governmentality: Insights from France," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Alvaro Ardura Urquiaga & Iñigo Lorente-Riverola & Javier Ruiz Sanchez, 2020. "Platform-mediated short-term rentals and gentrification in Madrid," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3095-3115, November.
    7. Gabriel Fauveaud & Adèle Esposito, 2021. "Beyond official heritage agendas: The third space of conservation practices in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2473-2489, September.
    8. Daniel Malet Calvo, 2018. "Understanding international students beyond studentification: A new class of transnational urban consumers. The example of Erasmus students in Lisbon (Portugal)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2142-2158, August.
    9. Iago Lestegás & João Seixas & Rubén-Camilo Lois-González, 2019. "Commodifying Lisbon: A Study on the Spatial Concentration of Short-Term Rentals," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Anderson-Gough, Fiona & Edgley, Carla & Robson, Keith & Sharma, Nina, 2022. "Organizational responses to multiple logics: Diversity, identity and the professional service firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Wonjun Cho & Minho Kim & Hyunjung Kim & Youngsang Kwon, 2020. "Transforming Housing to Commercial Use: A Case Study on Commercial Gentrification in Yeon-nam District, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Peter Francis Harvey, 2023. "“Everyone Thinks They’re Special†: How Schools Teach Children Their Social Station," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(3), pages 493-521, June.
    13. Renan Almeida & Pedro Patrício & Marcelo Brandão & Ramon Torres, 2022. "Can economic development policy trigger gentrification? Assessing and anatomising the mechanisms of state-led gentrification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 84-104, February.
    14. Susan J. Smith & Moira Munro & Hazel Christie, 2006. "Performing (Housing) Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 81-98, January.
    15. Clair, Matthew & Daniel, Caitlin & Lamont, Michèle, 2016. "Destigmatization and health: Cultural constructions and the long-term reduction of stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 223-232.
    16. Iago Lestegás, 2019. "Lisbon After the Crisis: From Credit‐fuelled Suburbanization to Tourist‐driven Gentrification," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 705-723, July.
    17. Kirkland, Anna, 2021. "Dropdown rights: Categorizing transgender discrimination in healthcare technologies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    18. Georgia Alexandri & Michael Janoschka, 2020. "‘Post-pandemic’ transnational gentrifications: A critical outlook," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3202-3214, November.
    19. Ståle Holgersen & Guy Baeten, 2016. "Beyond a Liberal Critique of ‘Trickle Down': Urban Planning in the City of Malmö," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1170-1185, November.
    20. Pablo Mendez, 2018. "Encounters with difference in the subdivided house: The case of secondary suites in Vancouver," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1274-1289, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:12:p:2383-2401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.