IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v29y2023i1p87-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It takes two to code: a comparative analysis of collective bargaining and artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Molina

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (QUIT), Spain)

  • Florian Butollo

    (Berlin Social Science Centre (WZB), Germany)

  • Csaba Makó

    (Institute for Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Social Sciences (TKSZI), Hungary)

  • Alejandro Godino

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (QUIT), Spain)

  • Ursula Holtgrewe

    (Zentrum für soziale Innovation (ZSI), Germany)

  • Anna Illsoe

    (University of Copenhagen (FAOS), Denmark)

  • Sander Junte

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (QUIT), Spain)

  • Trine Pernille Larsen

    (University of Copenhagen (FAOS), Denmark)

  • Miklós Illésy

    (Institute for Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Social Sciences (TKSZI), Hungary)

  • Jószef Pap

    (Institute for Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Social Sciences (TKSZI), Hungary)

  • Philip Wotschack

    (Berlin Social Science Centre (WZB), Germany)

Abstract

The extension of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic management mechanisms by companies has led to growing trade union demands to regulate their use. This article explores the role of collective bargaining and employee participation mechanisms in regulating the use by companies of AI and algorithms. This is done through a comparative analysis of institutional developments at EU level, as well as in four countries with different industrial relations models (Denmark, Germany, Hungary and Spain). The article shows that there are remarkable differences between countries in the roles of social partners and in the combination of protective and participative mechanisms used to respond to the challenges of AI and algorithmic management. However, the analysis also serves to highlight the limits of existing institutions and practices to cope with the complexity of challenges associated with AI and algorithmic management. This calls for institutional adaptation and additional regulatory efforts at EU and national levels to support collective bargaining.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Molina & Florian Butollo & Csaba Makó & Alejandro Godino & Ursula Holtgrewe & Anna Illsoe & Sander Junte & Trine Pernille Larsen & Miklós Illésy & Jószef Pap & Philip Wotschack, 2023. "It takes two to code: a comparative analysis of collective bargaining and artificial intelligence," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 87-104, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:29:y:2023:i:1:p:87-104
    DOI: 10.1177/10242589231156515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10242589231156515
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10242589231156515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel R. A. Schallmo & Christopher A. Williams, 2018. "Digital Transformation Now!," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-72844-5, October.
    2. Gerhard BOSCH, 2015. "Shrinking collective bargaining coverage, increasing income inequality: A comparison of five EU countries," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 154(1), pages 57-66, March.
    3. Marguerita Lane & Anne Saint-Martin, 2021. "The impact of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market: What do we know so far?," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 256, OECD Publishing.
    4. K. Sabeel Rahman & Kathleen Thelen, 2019. "The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism," Politics & Society, , vol. 47(2), pages 177-204, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerio De Stefano & Virginia Doellgast, 2023. "Introduction to the Transfer special issue. Regulating AI at work: labour relations, automation, and algorithmic management," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 9-20, February.
    2. Anke Hassel & Didem Özkiziltan, 2023. "Governing the work-related risks of AI: implications for the German government and trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 71-86, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ander, Veronika & Cihelka, Petr & Tyrychtr, Jan & Novák, David, 2022. "Towards Compromise User Experience Design in Ambient Intelligent Environment," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(2), June.
    2. Mohamed Mousa & Walid Chaouali & Monowar Mahmood, 2023. "The Inclusion of Gig Employees and their Career Satisfaction: Do Individual and Collaborative Job Crafting Play a Role?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1055-1068, September.
    3. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    4. Fatih Gurcan & Gizem Dilan Boztas & Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren & Mohammad Derawi, 2023. "Digital Transformation Strategies, Practices, and Trends: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Coveri, Andrea & Cozza, Claudio & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Blurring boundaries: an analysis of the digital platforms-military nexus," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1364, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Dolata, Ulrich & Schrape, Jan-Felix, 2022. "Platform architectures: The structuration of platform companies on the Internet," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2022-01, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    7. Trine P Larsen & Mikkel Mailand & Thorsten Schulten, 2022. "Good intentions meet harsh realities: Social dialogue and precarious work in industrial cleaning," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 7-31, February.
    8. Dolata, Ulrich, 2024. "Industry platforms: A new mode of coordination in the economy," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2024-02, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    9. Dr. Nickolaos Giovanis, 2018. "Determining Factors of Minimum Wage in the Member States of the OECD," Sumerianz Journal of Business Management and Marketing, Sumerianz Publication, vol. 1(4), pages 93-101, 12-2018.
    10. Sodamin, Dino & Vaněk, Jiří & Ulman, Miloš & Šimek, Pavel, 2022. "Fair Label versus Blockchain Technology from the Consumer Perspective: Towards a Comprehensive Research Agenda," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(2), June.
    11. Matthias Fabian Gregersen Trischler & Jason Li-Ying, 2023. "Digital business model innovation: toward construct clarity and future research directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 3-32, January.
    12. Daniel Schallmo & Christopher A. Williams & Jochen Lohse, 2019. "Digital Strategy — Integrated Approach And Generic Options," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Weisstanner, David, 2019. "Insiders under pressure: Flexible employment and wage inequality," INET Oxford Working Papers 2019-06, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    14. Marie Nilsen & Trond Kongsvik & Stian Antonsen, 2022. "Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Michał Goliński, 2019. "Measuring the digital economy in the European Union research," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 54, pages 155-170.
    16. Barry Eichengreen, 2023. "Financial regulation in the age of the platform economy," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 40-50, March.
    17. Nguyen, Phong Thanh & Nguyen, Linh Thi My, 2022. "Understanding platform market value through decentralization governance — An integrative model from signaling and mechanism design theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Eyert, Florian & Irgmaier, Florian & Ulbricht, Lena, 2022. "Extending the framework of algorithmic regulation. The Uber case," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 23-44.
    19. Paola Naddeo & Stefania Cardinaleschi, 2018. "Wage Gaps By Collective Bargaining And Firm Size In Italy," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 72(1), pages 31-40, January-M.
    20. Sheedy, Elizabeth & Zhang, Le & Tam, Kenny Chi Ho, 2019. "Incentives and culture in risk compliance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:29:y:2023:i:1:p:87-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.