IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v1y1995i1p31-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UK Unions: searching for a new agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Waddington

    (Industrial Relations Research Unit, University of Warwick)

Abstract

Throughout Western Europe since 1979 policies directed towards flexibility and deregulation have characterised labour market developments. In the UK these policies have been accompanied by the direct restriction of trade union influence. Between 1980 and 1993 Conservative governments in the UK introduced no fewer than eight Acts to regulate union activity. In addition, most tripartite institutions were abandoned, thereby excluding the trade unions from any role in macro-economic policy-making. Within this political environment, employers decentralised bargaining and narrowed the scope of collective job controls. The combined effect of these developments was to place trade unions on the defensive and to encourage the search for a new policy agenda appropriate for the circumstances of the 1990s. This paper reviews four key elements of this new policy agenda: recruitment strategies, modernising trade union structure, a social partnership with employers, and embracing the law. Although many modernising initiatives have been introduced by unions in the UK, it is far from certain that they are sufficient to reverse the decline that has taken place. In each of the policy areas discussed here, it is the tension between workplace and national union structures that is central to reform. The paper shows that workplace organisation in many areas is now isolated and national unions have been unable to support activities in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Waddington, 1995. "UK Unions: searching for a new agenda," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 1(1), pages 31-43, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:1:y:1995:i:1:p:31-43
    DOI: 10.1177/102425899500100105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425899500100105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425899500100105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Monks, 1993. "A Trade Union View of WIRS3," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 227-233, June.
    2. Robbie Gilbert, 1993. "Workplace Industrial Relations 25 Years after Donovan: An Employer View," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 235-253, June.
    3. Patricia Fosh, 1993. "Membership Participation in Workplace Unionism: The Possibility of Union Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 577-592, December.
    4. Kelly,John & Heery,Edmund, 1994. "Working for the Union," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521383202, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Leisink, 1997. "New union constituencies call for differentiated agendas and democratic participation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 3(3), pages 534-550, November.
    2. Jeremy Waddington & Reiner Hoffmann & Jens Lind, 1997. "European trade unionism in transition? a review of the issues," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 3(3), pages 464-497, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Morris, 1995. "Annual Review Article 1994," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 117-135, March.
    2. Jack Fiorito & Irene Padavic & Philip S. DeOrtentiis, 2015. "Reconsidering Union Activism and Its Meaning," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 556-579, September.
    3. Sakhela Buhlungu & Mick Brookes & Geoffrey Wood, 2008. "Trade Unions and Democracy in South Africa: Union Organizational Challenges and Solidarities in a Time of Transformation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 439-468, September.
    4. Gemma Edwards, 2009. "Public sector trade unionism in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 442-459, September.
    5. David Peetz & Barbara Pocock, 2009. "An Analysis of Workplace Representatives, Union Power and Democracy in Australia," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 623-652, December.
    6. Heather Connolly, 2020. "‘We just get a bit set in our ways’: renewing democracy and solidarity in UK trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 207-222, May.
    7. Edmund Heery & John Kelly, 1994. "Professional, Participative and Managerial Unionism: An Interpretation of Change in Trade Unions," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Jenny Kwai‐Sim Leung & Kieran James & Razvan V. Mustata & Carmen Giorgiana Bonaci, 2010. "Trade union strategy in Sydney's construction union: a Roman Catholic perspective," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(7), pages 488-511, June.
    9. Geraint Harvey & Andy Hodder & Stephen Brammer, 2017. "Trade union participation in CSR deliberation: an evaluation," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 42-55, January.
    10. Gregor Gall & Jack Fiorito, 2012. "Union Commitment and Activism in Britain and the United States: Searching for Synthesis and Synergy for Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 189-213, June.
    11. Richard Saundry & Mick McKeown, 2013. "Relational union organising in a healthcare setting: a qualitative study," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 533-547, November.
    12. Christian Lévesque & Gregor Murray, 2010. "Understanding union power: resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(3), pages 333-350, August.
    13. Simon R. de Turberville, 2004. "Does the ‘organizing model’ represent a credible union renewal strategy?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(4), pages 775-794, December.
    14. Moira Calveley & Geraldine Healy, 2003. "Political Activism and Workplace Industrial Relations in a UK ‘Failing’ School," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 41(1), pages 97-113, March.
    15. Willman, Paul, 2000. "The viability of trade union organisation: a bargaining unit analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20159, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Jack Fiorito & Irene Padavic & Zachary Russell, 2014. "Union Beliefs and Activism: A Research Note," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 346-357, December.
    17. Melanie Simms, 2013. "Special Issue. Edited by: Gregor Murray, Christian Lévesque, Christian Dufour and Adelheid Hege," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 373-388, July.
    18. Gerry Looker, 2019. "Union organising and Full‐time Officers: acquiescence and resistance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 517-531, November.
    19. Rosaria Burchielli & Timothy Bartram, 2007. "What makes organising work? A model of the stages and facilitators of organizing," Working Papers 2007.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    20. A Charlwood & K Hansen & David Metcalf, 2000. "Unions and the Sword of Justice: Unions and Pay Systems, Pay Inequality, Pay Discrimination and Low Pay," CEP Discussion Papers dp0452, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:1:y:1995:i:1:p:31-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.