IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i1p205-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students of Academic Capitalism: Emotional Dimensions in the Commercialization of Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Gretzky

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel)

  • Julia Lerner

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel)

Abstract

This article spotlights the emotional aspect of the commercialization of university studies. Whereas the literature on current challenges of higher education highlights the students’ customer role, we reveal how neoliberal studenthood combines a consumerist worldview with the discourse of emotional experience. The narratives of Israeli students in the present article show consumerist–emotional therapeutic duality in the ways they make sense of their encounter with the university. Students evaluate how their professors meet their emotional, therapeutic, and consumer needs and perceive the knowledge they acquire as providing them with both pragmatic skills and emotional experience. We argue that this duality is significant to the emerging culture of ‘academic capitalism’ and show how the commercialized feelings and pragmatics of self-development operate as a manifestation of ‘emotional capitalism’.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Gretzky & Julia Lerner, 2021. "Students of Academic Capitalism: Emotional Dimensions in the Commercialization of Higher Education," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(1), pages 205-221, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:205-221
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420968117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420968117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420968117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. Centra & Noreen B. Gaubatz, 2000. "Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 17-33, January.
    2. Elaine Swan, 2010. "Worked Up Selves," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-24676-8, December.
    3. Sheryl Clark & Anna Mountford-Zimdars & Becky Francis, 2015. "Risk, Choice and Social Disadvantage: Young People's Decision-Making in a Marketised Higher Education System," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(3), pages 110-123, August.
    4. Rosemary Deem & Rachel Johnson, 2003. "‘Risking the University? Learning to be a Manager-Academic in UK Universities’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 8(3), pages 17-31, August.
    5. Elaine Swan, 2010. "Worked Up Selves," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Worked Up Selves, chapter 8, pages 206-224, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antti Saari & Kristiina Brunila & Saara Vainio, 2024. "The Psychologization of Student Subjectivity in the Finnish Academia," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(2), pages 334-350, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Barnes, 2023. "Punish, protect or redirect? Synthesising workfare with ‘spatially Keynesian’ labour market policies in times of job loss," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 871-889, June.
    2. De Witte, Kristof & Rogge, Nicky & Cherchye, Laurens & Van Puyenbroeck, Tom, 2013. "Economies of scope in research and teaching: A non-parametric investigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 305-314.
    3. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    4. Albrecht, W. Steve & Hoopes, Jeff, 2009. "An empirical assessment of commercial web-based professor evaluation services," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 125-132.
    5. De Witte, Kristof & Rogge, Nicky, 2011. "Accounting for exogenous influences in performance evaluations of teachers," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 641-653, August.
    6. Nina Zipser & Lisa Mincieli & Dmitry Kurochkin, 2021. "Are There Gender Differences in Quantitative Student Evaluations of Instructors?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 62(7), pages 976-997, November.
    7. De Witte, Kristof & Rogge, Nicky, 2009. "Accounting for exogenous influences in a benevolent performance evaluation of teachers," Working Papers 2009/15, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    8. Nicolás Urdaneta Andrade, 2021. "¿Hombres "cracks" y mujeres "amables"? Sesgos de género en encuestas de profesores," Documentos CEDE 19557, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    9. Tom Clark & Rita Hordósy, 2019. "Social Identification, Widening Participation and Higher Education: Experiencing Similarity and Difference in an English Red Brick University," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 353-369, September.
    10. Joonmo Cho & Wonyoung Baek, 2019. "Identifying Factors Affecting the Quality of Teaching in Basic Science Education: Physics, Biological Sciences, Mathematics, and Chemistry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Horacio Matos-Díaz & Alfred J. Crouch Ruiz, 2008. "¿Es sesgada la evaluación estudiantil? El caso de la Universidad de Puerto Rico en Bayamón," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 10(18), pages 241-260, January-J.
    12. Robert L. Moore & Hanna Song & James D. Whitney, 2021. "Do Students Discriminate? Exploring Differentials by Race and Sex in Class Enrollments and Student Ratings of Instructors," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 135-162, January.
    13. Ross Guest & Nicholas Rohde & Saroja Selvanathan & Tommy Soesmanto, 2017. "Student satisfaction and online teaching," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201707, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    14. Cannon, Edmund & Cipriani, Giam Pietro, 2021. "Gender Differences in Student Evaluations of Teaching: Identification and Consequences," IZA Discussion Papers 14387, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Fatima Hameed & Amjad Ali & Amina Hameed & Zohra Saleem & Yasir Javed, 2015. "Teacher evaluation: the role of gender," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1779-1789, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:205-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.