IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v6y2016i4p2158244016679209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Grounded Theory to Investigating Change Management in the Nonprofit Sector

Author

Listed:
  • David Rosenbaum
  • A. M. Elizabeth More
  • Peter Steane

Abstract

Grounded theory is well supported as a qualitative research method that historically responded to the epistemological challenges of defining knowledge and determining how it has been acquired. While its historical and unique methodological underpinnings remain consistent, its ongoing application and methods of execution continue to expand its use. The consideration of using grounded theory by researchers embodies the need to explore the methodology and thereafter seek to develop the method that reflects the researcher’s skills, the research setting, and the research aims. This article sets out a particular method of applying it to the study of change management using a rich single case study in the nonprofit sector. Key findings are that nonprofit specific change management models may need to incorporate a focus on formal reflection for change agents and change recipients, development of trust and confidence in the organization prior to the actual change, focusing on the individual experience of change, and recognizing the sequencing of events from a planning perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rosenbaum & A. M. Elizabeth More & Peter Steane, 2016. "Applying Grounded Theory to Investigating Change Management in the Nonprofit Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:2158244016679209
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244016679209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016679209
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244016679209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Rowley, 2012. "Conducting research interviews," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3/4), pages 260-271, March.
    2. Balogun, Julia & Jenkins, Mark, 2003. "Re-conceiving Change Management:: A Knowledge-based Perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 247-257, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Rosenbaum & Elizabeth More, 2021. "Risk and Opportunity—The Leadership Challenge in a World of Uncertainty—Learnings from Research into the Implementation of the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers," MPRA Paper 116752, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jan 2023.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas Hammerschmidt & Fabian Eggers & Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Matthias Filser, 2020. "Entrepreneurial orientation in sports entrepreneurship - a mixed methods analysis of professional soccer clubs in the German-speaking countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 839-857, September.
    2. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    3. Pëdro Sáenz Muñoz, 2008. "Gestión del conocimiento en PYME's: Qué aspectos cuentan?," Investigación & Desarrollo, Universidad Privada Boliviana, vol. 1(1), pages 1-73–90.
    4. Brett Anthony White & John Dumay, 2020. "The angel investment decision: insights from Australian business angels," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3133-3162, September.
    5. Wang, Miaomiao & Mühlbacher, Hans & Wittmann, Xinhua & Perrett, Pieter, 2021. "Dynamic collaboration between small- and medium-sized enterprises from highly dissimilar markets," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 185-200.
    6. Graña, Fernando M. & del Mar Benavides-Espinosa, Maria & Roig-Dobón, Salvador, 2018. "Determinants of silent and explicit industrial design," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 314-320.
    7. Valeria Lo Iacono & Paul Symonds & David H.K. Brown, 2016. "Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 103-117, May.
    8. Joachim Josef Nigg & Sarah Eichelberger, 2021. "Sustainable Product Development for Accessible Tourism: Case Studies Demonstrating the Need for Stakeholder Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele & Mühlbacher, Hans & Taishoff, Marika, 2020. "Exploring consumers’ subjective shopping experiences in directly operated luxury brand stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Saif Mir & John A. Aloysius & Stephanie Eckerd, 2017. "Understanding Supplier Switching Behavior: The Role of Psychological Contracts in a Competitive Setting," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(3), pages 3-18, July.
    11. Janette Hughes & Marilyn Lennon & Robert J. Rogerson & George Crooks, 2021. "Scaling Digital Health Innovation: Developing a New ‘Service Readiness Level’ Framework of Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Bezjian, James & Stoyanova, Veselina & McKiernan, Peter & MacKay, R. Bradley, 2020. "Synthesizing scenario planning and industry recipes through an analysis of the Hollywood film industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Lee, Darren, 2015. "Innovation & the professional service firm: Insights into the Locus, Patterns, and Tensions of Innovation in a Fast-Growing Information Technology Consultancy in New Zealand," MBA Research Papers 19379, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Management.
    14. Filipa Silva & Teresa Proença & Marisa R. Ferreira, 2018. "Volunteers’ perspective on online volunteering - a qualitative approach," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(4), pages 531-552, December.
    15. Stathakopoulos, Vlasis & Kottikas, Konstantinos G. & Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Kottika, Efthymia, 2019. "Market-driving strategy and personnel attributes: Top management versus middle management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 529-540.
    16. Amber Theeuwen & Valérie Duplat & Christopher Wickert & Brian Tjemkes, 2021. "How Do Women Overcome Gender Inequality by Forming Small-Scale Cooperatives? The Case of the Agricultural Sector in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Acosta, Alejandro & McCorriston, Steve & Nicolli, Francesco & Venturelli, Ester & Wickramasinghe, Upali & ArceDiaz, Eduardo & Scudiero, Lavinia & Sammartino, Alejandro & Schneider, Fritz & Steinfeld, , 2021. "Immediate effects of COVID-19 on the global dairy sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Jason Thomas, 2018. "Individual Cyber Security: Empowering Employees to Resist Spear Phishing to Prevent Identity Theft and Ransomware Attacks," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 1-1, April.
    19. Jundong Hou & Chi Zhang & Robert Allen King, 2018. "Measuring trust damage in nonprofit marketing: the role of cognitive and emotional perceptions," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(1), pages 25-47, March.
    20. Craig Wallington & Gary Marques & Warren Maroun, 2021. "Equity Versus Liabilities Debate, in the Context of Accounting for Employee Share Options," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(4), pages 286-306, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:2158244016679209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.