IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i8p383-d616046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Opportunity—The Leadership Challenge in a World of Uncertainty—Learnings from Research into the Implementation of the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • David Rosenbaum

    (King’s Own Institute, Sydney 2000, Australia)

  • Elizabeth More

    (Chief Academic Office, Study Group, Sydney 2010, Australia)

Abstract

This paper considers the risks and opportunities inherent in a major national change process through a descriptive approach to the implementation challenges for Australian non-profit disability service providers as they grapple with the implementation of the transformational National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). It highlights the leadership challenges associated with the newly developed NDIS Implementation Framework and, in doing so, recognises the risk and opportunity issues contained with that implementation process. The research used grounded theory coupled with framework analysis in a qualitative study that, in part, sought to identify leadership characteristics deemed necessary to minimize risks, capitalize on opportunities, and support positive change outcomes leading to successful NDIS implementations amongst several participating organisations, each with differing demographics and at different stages in the implementation process. The findings, which have been grouped into phases, suggest a range of leadership attributes at key phases of the NDIS implementation that are necessary to minimise implementation risks and maximise opportunities associated with the NDIS. These phases have been identified as: (i) An input phase where the emphasis must be on internal change preparedness and external environmental impacts and drivers; (ii) A process phase where the emphasis is on direct implementation issues; and (iii) An outcomes phase where active consideration needs to be on organisational mission sustainability, as well as the risk and opportunity challenge. The study is crucial in revealing leadership challenges and lessons for large scale change and risk management in the non-profit sector, within and beyond the specific case of Australia’s NDIS implementation, useful for both scholars and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rosenbaum & Elizabeth More, 2021. "Risk and Opportunity—The Leadership Challenge in a World of Uncertainty—Learnings from Research into the Implementation of the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:383-:d:616046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/8/383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/8/383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Roberts, 2020. "Servant Leadership and Change: A Review of the Literature," Management for Professionals, in: Satinder Dhiman & Joan Marques (ed.), New Horizons in Positive Leadership and Change, chapter 3, pages 33-64, Springer.
    2. David Rosenbaum & A. M. Elizabeth More & Peter Steane, 2016. "Applying Grounded Theory to Investigating Change Management in the Nonprofit Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    3. Mario Levesque, 2020. "Leadership as Interpreneurship: A Disability Nonprofit Atlantic Canadian Profile," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 182-192.
    4. Mohammed Aboramadan & Yasir Mansoor Kundi, 2020. "Does Transformational Leadership Better Predict Work-Related Outcomes Than Transactional Leadership in the NPO Context? Evidence from Italy," Post-Print hal-03511393, HAL.
    5. Aboramadan M. & Yasir Mansoor Kundi, 2020. "Does Transformational Leadership Better Predict Work-Related Outcomes Than Transactional Leadership in the NPO Context? Evidence from Italy," Post-Print hal-03082969, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Pablo Araya-Orellana, 2022. "Assessment of the Leadership Styles in Public Organizations: an Analysis of Public Employees Perception," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 99-116, March.
    2. Simran Sodhi & Amit K Dwivedi, 2024. "Differently Abled Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Literature Review on Fifty Years of Research—Exploring Thoughts and Debate with Reference to Entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(1), pages 183-220, February.
    3. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers," MPRA Paper 116752, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jan 2023.
    4. Wayu Eko Yudiatmaja & Roy Valiant Salomo & Eko Prasojo, 2023. "Fostering Innovative Behavior of Millennial Public Employee Through Leadership Styles and Organizational Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    5. Cristine de Clercy, 2020. "On the Intersection of Leadership and Populism in North America and Europe," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 107-110.
    6. Yasir Mansoor Kundi & Shakir Sardar & Kamal Badar, 2021. "Linking performance pressure to employee work engagement: the moderating role of emotional stability," Post-Print hal-03183363, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:383-:d:616046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.